- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Kari Lake Election Contest TRIAL! Viva & Barnes Live Commentary
Posted on 12/22/22 at 2:54 pm to Cali 4 LSU
Posted on 12/22/22 at 2:54 pm to Cali 4 LSU
quote:
If this is true:
quote:
it's obvious some shenanigans went on in this election.
then why would this happen:
quote:
there is no way this judge rules in Lake's favor
Makes no sense.
Do you really think the judge is going to order a new election - which is the only remedy for this issue? I think he should but I have no actual hope he will.
2
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:01 pm to MFn GIMP
That image they just showed calculated to 27.7% spoiled or misread ballots. 158 spoiled or misread vs 414 counted.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:02 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
Yes. I'm not saying anything otherwise. I'm asking how does shrink-to-fit shrink a 20" image to 19" when the size of the print paper has not changed? You can't shrink a 20" image designed for 20" paper to 19" on the same 20" paper because of shrink-to-fit.
Are we certain all of the original images were 20"? These ballots are unique to each voter so some had a lot more on theirs than others. So even if every single printer had "shrink to fit" setting on, if the images aren't all the same it would only impact those that are too big.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:03 pm to MFn GIMP
This trial, so far, has proven beyond a reasonable doubt this election was tampered with
And yet we know what will happen
So what’s next? Just accept we live in the USSA?
And yet we know what will happen
So what’s next? Just accept we live in the USSA?
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:04 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
Do you really think the judge is going to order a new election
I could be mistaken but doesn't Arizona have precedent of changing actual election results? I get being demoralized in this statement:
quote:
I think he should but I have no actual hope he will.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:06 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Are we certain all of the original images were 20"? T
Testimony yesterday from the Maricopa County Recorder and another Maricopa County employee, can't remember the actual position, said yes. There were no 19" images made. The only ones they made were 20".
ETA: It was actually this guy testifying now who was the second person.
This post was edited on 12/22/22 at 3:07 pm
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:10 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
Testimony yesterday from the Maricopa County Recorder and another Maricopa County employee, can't remember the actual position, said yes. There were no 19" images made. The only ones they made were 20".
ETA: It was actually this guy testifying now who was the second person.
Are you saying he perjured himself? I didn't watch yesterday & haven't really followed all this...
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:12 pm to Cali 4 LSU
quote:
Are you saying he perjured himself? I didn't watch yesterday & haven't really followed all this...
Not necessarily. He has just picked up the defense's argument that it was just shrink-to-fit that caused the shrinking of the image even though the only created image was 20".
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:17 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
Not necessarily. He has just picked up the defense's argument that it was just shrink-to-fit that caused the shrinking of the image even though the only created image was 20".
Oh here we go on cross...
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:18 pm to Cali 4 LSU
quote:
Oh here we go on cross...
Immediately called him out on it too.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:18 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
Are we certain all of the original images were 20"? These ballots are unique to each voter so some had a lot more on theirs than others. So even if every single printer had "shrink to fit" setting on, if the images aren't all the same it would only impact those that are too big.
I think we are certain that he markings on the edge of the ballot image need to be consistent across all ballots in order for the system to be able to accurately tabulate the images.
To the degree that this is not the case, it is indicative of a major error (intentional or otherwise) of the system.
What are you suggesting?
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:19 pm to moneyg
Of course the defense objected and the judge made him restate. The witness is straight up lying now.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:19 pm to theunknownknight
Here we go with the cross.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:24 pm to loogaroo
Let's assume the entire issue is print-to-fit. Sure, whatever. This guy just testified testing showed everything worked correctly and it must have been changed after. Doesn't that prove it was intentional?
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:27 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
Let's assume the entire issue is print-to-fit. Sure, whatever. This guy just testified testing showed everything worked correctly and it must have been changed after. Doesn't that prove it was intentional?
I know you don't have high hopes but how in the hell will they get away with this? Even IF unintentional, it isn't following procedure or proving their own chain of custody issues. Of course, I'm over my head in all of this....
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:28 pm to MFn GIMP
quote:
Doesn't that prove it was intentional?
How else would it have been changed?
This alone should require another election.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:29 pm to loogaroo
quote:
How else would it have been changed?
This alone should require another election.
The last answer where he said the printer settings were changed on election day absolutely proves intentionality in my mind.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:30 pm to MFn GIMP
Holy shite he just said they also had these same issues in November 2020. Shocking.
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:31 pm to MFn GIMP
She just said human error. A human error would require another election.
This post was edited on 12/22/22 at 3:32 pm
Posted on 12/22/22 at 3:32 pm to loogaroo
People appearing remotely drives me crazy. They really can't show up after being subpoenaed?
Page 18 of 25
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News