Mickey Goldmill

[quote]It is too ridiculous to watch. He is struggling.[/quote] He really is. He’s obviously way in over his head. He had no answers at all. Sounds like he just hopes people will stop on their own. ...

He’s saying if they censor it he won’t see it and won’t know about it. ...

[quote]You don’t get it, but you rarely do. From the bill: [/quote] It’s not a bill. And I wasn’t arguing about the EO at all. You don’t get it apparently. :cheers:...

[quote]This is the exact style of disingenuous take we all expect from your account. I'm not sure about what you are. Are you a bot? Are you a politically motivated account? Are you a child rapist? BTW, under the new EO I couldn't say any of those things. Maybe we would all benefit from a less b...

Agreed...

[quote]According to the regulations it IS EXACTLY an "either/or" thing. If Chicken never made a decision about the appropriateness of a post then TD is a platform. As soon as he interferes in what TD posters can communicate he is a publisher. It's unbelievably simple. If you are in the business of b...

[quote]But they’re not protected from liability when they produce their own content, including their decision to fact check Trump and the Chinese ambassador. But I don’t know what they would they would be liable for from those fact checks themselves.[/quote] This is how I look at it as well. Pret...

[quote]HERE ARE THE FACTS: 1/ There are regulations, which 2/ social media companies have picked a choosed their favorite strategies, which 3/ have led us into a shitshow of unconstitutional AIDS. [/quote] The social media companies didn’t decide what the law is. It doesn’t matter what they say t...

[quote]That is such a disingenuous take. The EO is not about some new level of governmental control. It's about enforcing existing law that was muddied by years of weak leadership. Is enforcing current/existing law an overreach? Is expecting a company to abide by the terms of their agreement with go...

I just read this article which pretty much explains how I’ve been arguing all day. It goes into much greater detail regarding the history behind the law which I encourage others to read, but this part sums it up: [quote]Section 230 makes Internet platforms and other Internet speakers immune from ...

[quote]You mean like CNN? They print exactly what they want, no government meddling. They're just not exempt from liability. Why should some publishers be exempt from liability but not others? You like the government picking winners and losers?[/quote] CNN is liable for content they produce, not ...

You may be right :cheers:...

I never said the courts were going to rule a certain way. You’re view of the situation may very well be exactly how a court rules. But until then, “by definition” they are protected no matter what they show they can or cannot do. ...

It doesn’t specifically say “social media” but 230 is where it’s defined. ...

It’s not an exception. It’s a law that defines what social media companies are and what protections they have. That’s it. You’re making up conclusions that aren’t backed by law. That’s not how it works. They are defined and protected and until that law is amended, replaced, or interpreted differentl...

[quote]Wasn't there also a riot at a pumpkin festival a few years back? I want to say it was up in one of the yankee states.[/quote] The link I shared showed riots mentioning pumpkins but I didn’t get the reference lol...

I did a quick google search and found this. Predictably they were mostly related to sports. [link=(https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2014/11/white-people-rioting-for-no-reason.html)]https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2014/11/white-people-rioting-for-no-reason.html[/link]...

:cheers:...

[quote]Mickie Goodmill supports endless wars in the ME[/quote] Flattered you mentioned me, but no I do not. We should bring back everyone we have in the Middle East. ...

[quote]is Philonise a man or woman? [/quote] Man, the guy all the way to the right in that pic. ...