Started By
Message

re: James Comey indicted for threatening to kill the President.

Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:12 pm to
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
145196 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:12 pm to
quote:

The person whose body you're twisting this knife in cannot respond


is he in court?
Posted by Sams Crow
Idaho
Member since Apr 2026
1163 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:18 pm to
quote:

We are currently being governed by the dumbest mother frickers on the planet

You can call me an anarchist, you can even call me a Dem if you're cruel, but I support any means we use to put that scumbag behind bars.
Posted by deathvalleytiger10
Member since Sep 2009
9629 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:19 pm to
quote:

currently
?????

Hell this century has been bad. And only getting worse.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
15870 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

Now, expressing a desire for the President to be assassinated may not actually be a crime. I don't think you can assume he was openly threatening Trump.


Good point.

I should have said, "If a crime was committed, then I'm fine with it."

You know why I didn't?

Because I already said that in my initial post, which is the one I assume you replied to.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
37000 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:22 pm to
quote:

My dad used the term 60 years ago when I was a tyke. He used it to mean "throw it away". Your explanation doesn't make sense to me. If we're out of oysters how can I 86 them, unless 86 means "get more"?


I worked as a waiter for years in college, 86 always meant “eliminate from the menu”.

Anyone with a brain knows what Comey meant. He was coyly suggesting Trump be assassinated. Any other explanation is ridiculous since he wasn’t up for reelection or being considered for impeachment. How else would he be “eliminated”?
Posted by Tampa Ray
Member since Oct 2026
438 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:23 pm to
quote:

Yep. People supporting this are not fans of free speech. This is the biggest reach ever. Arranging seashells into the #86 gets you 20 years in prison for threatening to kill the president. Thats wild


Everyone should find this disturbing.

Conservatives have been ranting about Europeans being jailed for Facebook posts.
But when Trump does it it's awesome.
Weaponizing the government against your enemies is some tyrannical 3rd World crap, regardless if it's Dems or Republicans.
This post was edited on 11/2/26 at 2:29 pm
Posted by Whodat4300
Tennessee
Member since Jul 2020
1325 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:24 pm to
Yep. lol same old same old.
Posted by sgallo3
Lake Charles
Member since Sep 2008
28905 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

Would it be different if the shells spelled out Kill Donald Trump, in your opinion?

Yep, 100%

86 can mean kill but it can also mean remove. Kill is not debatable.
This post was edited on 11/2/26 at 2:26 pm
Posted by antibarner
Member since Oct 2009
27167 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:28 pm to
Where were all these bastards during "Russian Collusion? When we had night after night of Russia Russia Russia and Rod Rosenstein committing sedition by naming a Special Counsel when he knew damn well the whole thing was a Clinton dirty trick.

When we had Robert Mueller's Merry Men running wild when they knew it was a Clinton dirty trick.

Letitia James doing her best Lavrentiy Beria imitation running for office promising to get Trump....and then going after him on a ridiculous charge.

Again and again and again rights were violated and ridiculous charges were levied where were they then?

But now the Rabbit has the gun? Here they come.

Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
39300 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:33 pm to
Here we go again, and again it will get thrown out. It's too wide open to different interpretations.
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
64253 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:35 pm to
It’s not even entertaining anymore.
Posted by beaux duke
Member since Oct 2023
5135 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:41 pm to
quote:

You apparently didn't, because none of that denies that the term has been used as a term for murder since the 70s.

All it does is dispel a myth about how it came to be used that way.

Did you really think that was a gotcha' to anybody but yourself?

this is hard to watch
nobody except the dumbest among us thought comey meant kill the president. imo even trump doesn't believe it. but he's got something to talk about to distract from the iran war, his outrageous spending habits, etc.
this will go nowhere and be tossed just like his previous efforts to get back at comey because he hurt trumps delicate feelings. if anything, he should be thanking comey - his reopening of the killary investigation likely got trump in office 2016
Posted by LSUnKaty
Katy, TX
Member since Dec 2008
5062 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

That depends upon which definition we are operating.
The real definition.

The one that establishes a discernible category, with clear criteria for determining which cases are included and which are not.

Posted by MAADFACTS
Member since Jul 2021
1492 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:52 pm to
quote:

The poster to whom I replied said it was. I was quoting him (in a pretty tight paraphrase).



I am the poster you replied to
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
93279 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:56 pm to
quote:

Yep, 100%

86 can mean kill but it can also mean remove. Kill is not debatable.


There’s no way to know for sure.
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
79308 posts
Posted on 11/2/26 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

beaux duke


Why are you and your ilk here wasting your time on this since "it's going nowhere." Shouldn't you be doxxing and threatening Haley Stevens like a good little soldier?
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 5Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram