0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: James Comey indicted for threatening to kill the President.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:00 pm to Penrod
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:00 pm to Penrod
quote:
If we're out of oysters how can I 86 them, unless 86 means "get more"?
I think it meant, "Take them off the menu." As in, "We're out of oysters, so 86 the oyster stew!"
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:01 pm to Tampa Ray
go back to eh biden era and they would prosecute you for even "thinking" about stuff!!
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:01 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
But, "It's not about the law at all, it's just about Trump getting revenge for someone hurting his feelings or making him angry" is not o.k.
The fact that MAGA has no regard for the rule of law or the constitution and apparently wants the US to become a bannana republic is a problem.
Do you really deny that Comey was expressing support for killing Trump?
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:01 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
But, "It's not about the law at all, it's just about Trump getting revenge for someone hurting his feelings or making him angry" is not o.k.
It’s not about that. It’s making sure that going forward everyone who is thinking of getting in the way of Trump’s mandate to rule this country the way the voters want, thinks twice about getting in his way
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:01 pm to ksayetiger
quote:
frick comey Indict him every few weeks. Even if they dont stick.
Pretty sure this is lawfare
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:02 pm to Penrod
It meant "take them off the menu (don't let people order them) since we're out of them" during my illustrious restaurant career.
This post was edited on 11/2/26 at 2:03 pm
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:02 pm to justjoe906
quote:
And like all the previous times this will go nowhere...
It doesn’t matter. Do you have any idea how expensive it is to defend oneself against the Feds?
Even if Comey wins, he loses.
He is going to burn through so much cash defending himself that he will feel extreme pain.
Additionally, the emotional toll on he and his family from this- no matter what they portray to the contrary- will be immense.
Even if he ultimately wins…he loses.
I like it with a conviction or without.
frick Jim and his family.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:03 pm to atlgamecockman
I think it's the good lawfare tho?
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:03 pm to Penrod
86-remove from tonight’s special list usually as the special sold out.
Bleeds over to 86 pickles because we are out of pickles
But Comey was most certainly using the double meaning knowing he’d get away with it.
Comey is an actual TDS patient after all
Bleeds over to 86 pickles because we are out of pickles
But Comey was most certainly using the double meaning knowing he’d get away with it.
Comey is an actual TDS patient after all
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:04 pm to Tampa Ray
quote:
How did he threaten?
Are they referring to the Sea Shell thing?
If so that's quite a reach
Yep. People supporting this are not fans of free speech. This is the biggest reach ever. Arranging seashells into the #86 gets you 20 years in prison for threatening to kill the president. Thats wild
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:04 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:On one hand, yes, there’s no way this isn’t just a big waste of time and money.
We are currently being governed by the dumbest mother frickers on the planet
On the other hand, we both know what Comey was doing by posting the photo.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:04 pm to moneyg
quote:
Do you really deny that Comey was expressing support for killing Trump?
I don't remember the timing. If he was, then I'm fine with it.
But that's not what the poster to whom I replied said. He specifically said (fairly tight paraphrase), "It's not about justice, it's about Trump getting revenge on anybody who crosses him."
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:04 pm to TigerDoc
The only good lawfare is apparently the lawfare done for the chosen team
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:04 pm to Tampa Ray
quote:
How did he threaten? Are they referring to the Sea Shell thing? If so that's quite a reach
Nobody is above the law
We should ALL be ok with this because it’s unacceptable
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:05 pm to Rebel
SFP being the first response is glorious
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:05 pm to sgallo3
quote:Would it be different if the shells spelled out Kill Donald Trump, in your opinion?
Yep. People supporting this are not fans of free speech. This is the biggest reach ever. Arranging seashells into the #86 gets you 20 years in prison for threatening to kill the president. Thats wild
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:05 pm to MAADFACTS
quote:
It’s not about that.
The poster to whom I replied said it was. I was quoting him (in a pretty tight paraphrase).
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:07 pm to atlgamecockman
Yes, if you believe you've been wronged, you get at least one lawfare. Board lawyahs can fill us in on the details.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:09 pm to justjoe906
Trump doesn’t give up on his vendettas
Posted on 11/2/26 at 2:10 pm to wackatimesthree
quote:
I don't remember the timing. If he was, then I'm fine with it.
Well, he definitely was.
Now, expressing a desire for the President to be assassinated may not actually be a crime. I don't think you can assume he was openly threatening Trump.
If people were reasonable about this, they would acknowledge the truth that he was referencing assassination.
Then a reasonable argument could be had about whether he was actually calling for it (dog whistle) or just expressing a desire for a terrible event because he dislikes Trump so much.
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News