0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Investigators want to speak to Decoy Dan, no one can find him
Posted on 10/29/26 at 8:52 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Posted on 10/29/26 at 8:52 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
Remember when the Moss Bluff attorney was posting about how Daniel Sullivan had nothing to worry about?
Posted on 10/29/26 at 8:53 pm to tigerfan 64
quote:
We have been assured this is an acquisition
What does this mean?
Posted on 10/29/26 at 8:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Are they trying the same prosecution as the kid who made memes?
Are you trying to equate this to the democrats paying someone to run for the senate because their name is the same of a sitting senator? Have you seen the evidence that this actually happened? We know you are autistic but now you are showing that you are stupid also. Good job rain man.
Posted on 10/29/26 at 9:01 pm to Warboo
quote:
Have you seen the evidence that this actually happened?
We have evidence of the memes, too. They actually happened, too.
quote:
but now you are showing that you are stupid also.
Posted on 10/29/26 at 9:25 pm to BFIV
- Called Georgia election officials demanding they “find” 11,780 votes.
- Organized fake elector slates to overturn an election.
- Pressured Mike Pence to reject legitimate electoral votes.
- Tried to use the Justice Department to overturn election results.
- Pressured state legislators to change certified election outcomes.
- Considered seizing voting machines.
- Tried to stop the certification of an election on January 6.
- Entertained deploying troops or federal agents near polling places.
- Pushed baseless election fraud claims for years.
- Are now threatening to block certification of an Alaska election if they lose.
- Organized fake elector slates to overturn an election.
- Pressured Mike Pence to reject legitimate electoral votes.
- Tried to use the Justice Department to overturn election results.
- Pressured state legislators to change certified election outcomes.
- Considered seizing voting machines.
- Tried to stop the certification of an election on January 6.
- Entertained deploying troops or federal agents near polling places.
- Pushed baseless election fraud claims for years.
- Are now threatening to block certification of an Alaska election if they lose.
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:22 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
We have been assured this is an acquisition
What does this mean?
Borrowed from a former Port Allen mayor.
She did an interview about the investigation of her illegal acts, and claimed it was an "aquisition" (inquisition).
The pt liberal defense crew has taken a similar tact in regard to the doj taking the Peltola election team to court.
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You need serious work on posting relevant responses
When you don't want to answer a direct question, pretend it is ridiculous, declare victory, and hope no one recognizes how you avoided the question. Debate 101.
Posted on 10/29/26 at 10:41 pm to Patato Salad
quote:
BFIV - Called Georgia election officials demanding they “find” 11,780 votes. - Organized fake elector slates to overturn an election. - Pressured Mike Pence to reject legitimate electoral votes. - Tried to use the Justice Department to overturn election results. - Pressured state legislators to change certified election outcomes. - Considered seizing voting machines. - Tried to stop the certification of an election on January 6. - Entertained deploying troops or federal agents near polling places. - Pushed baseless election fraud claims for years. - Are now threatening to block certification of an Alaska election if they lose.
Accuracy here is less than 10 percent.
Posted on 10/30/26 at 5:08 am to Diego Ricardo
quote:
I don't think there is anything really illegal about what happened but it is incredibly poor taste.
Didn't Peltola and staff answer questions...under oath...concerning "recruiting" the other Sullivan to run? Didn't the NY Times find emails and text messages saying otherwise?
I believe Alaska has a legal statute about that. It's worth them looking into it.
Posted on 10/30/26 at 5:45 am to RCDfan1950
quote:So are any associated parties who testified in the AK SC case.
Dan is between a rock and a hard place
Posted on 10/30/26 at 6:19 am to DMAN1968
Luckily, Alaska is ranked choice voting so unsure voters can just vote Sullivans 1-2 and unrank Perolta.
Posted on 10/30/26 at 6:21 am to TenWheelsForJesus
quote:
When you don't want to answer a direct question, pretend it is ridiculous, declare victory, and hope no one recognizes how you avoided the question.
He asked a non-relevant question. Why would I answer his framed, irrelevant question?
Posted on 10/30/26 at 6:25 am to SlowFlowPro
SlowPeltolaPro back in the saddle!
Posted on 10/30/26 at 6:32 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
State Law, Decoy Dan is ok. However, there some federal laws that could be in question if the accusations are true .
Here is a good podcast (Advisory Opinions) on the topic:
LINK
Here is a good podcast (Advisory Opinions) on the topic:
LINK
Posted on 10/30/26 at 6:45 am to DMAN1968
quote:
Didn't Peltola and staff answer questions...under oath...concerning "recruiting" the other Sullivan to run?
They responded to the court with a brief that stated they didn't know anything about it.
So seems the texts/advisor comments to the NYT (if they hold to be true) would mean those legal briefs would be fraudulent and whomever on her staff/lawyer that submitted would be prosecuted for lying to the court
Posted on 10/30/26 at 7:20 am to RCDfan1950
quote:and the only way out once/if found is to spill every bean, and some.
Dan is between a rock and a hard place. Conspiracy to defraud voters will stick. He stepped in it.
If he’s never found, Hilary’s retirement fund got fatter.
I don’t know about up that way, but I’m not hearing that much about how this is a major negative of rank choice voting. It needs to be harped on, to finally put an end to it. There and anywhere it is elsewhere.
Posted on 10/30/26 at 7:28 am to RohanGonzales
So if the other Dan Sullivan narrowly loses to the other Dan Sullivan the other Dan Sullivan has recourse too, right?
If anything, I would certainly call it an ignorance issue and use it to push for an IQ or literacy test for voting, something that was removed in the 1960's due to the disenfranchising of ignorant people. If people are that ignorant to vote for the other Dan Sullivan other than the other Dan Sullivan they really wanted to vote for, how does it become a Federal issue or crime when it is due to their ignorance?
If anything, I would certainly call it an ignorance issue and use it to push for an IQ or literacy test for voting, something that was removed in the 1960's due to the disenfranchising of ignorant people. If people are that ignorant to vote for the other Dan Sullivan other than the other Dan Sullivan they really wanted to vote for, how does it become a Federal issue or crime when it is due to their ignorance?
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News