- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Income taxes should be higher.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 9:26 am to FATBOY TIGER
Posted on 7/26/26 at 9:26 am to FATBOY TIGER
quote:
17% across the board.
Repeal income tax.
Impose an across the board national sales tax of 10%.
Only exemptions are business and home purchases/sales, which will have a national sales tax of 3% (no more capital gains taxes).
Posted on 7/26/26 at 9:27 am to LaMigra
quote:
You people still think we should pay income taxes?
No but, a fair tax system is a start.
quote:
How about Washington goes on a fricking diet first!!
quote:
Oh and while we are at it get rid of property taxes and tax gains!!
Posted on 7/26/26 at 9:36 am to FATBOY TIGER
quote:Hall-Rabushka(sp?) plan?
17% across the board
Posted on 7/26/26 at 9:53 am to tLSU
Denmark, Norway, Sweden and The Netherlands have income taxes that people complain about, but based on my conversations with the citizens, nobody wants to fundamentally change the system. They’re content…
Posted on 7/26/26 at 9:56 am to VOR
quote:
Denmark, Norway, Sweden and The Netherlands have income taxes that people complain about, but based on my conversations with the citizens, nobody wants to fundamentally change the system. They’re content…
They've had the USA protecting their asses for 80 years, thus allowing them to put more $$$ into their social welfare programs. Programs that are not being systematically defrauded by "migrants" (who constitute very small percentages of their population). They also have very homogeneous populations.
So, it's easy to be "content"
This post was edited on 7/26/26 at 9:57 am
Posted on 7/26/26 at 10:03 am to udtiger
Flat tax of 10% on income. No property tax. No welfare by government..
Trim back irs greatly. Eliminate the property tax bureaucracy .
Trim back irs greatly. Eliminate the property tax bureaucracy .
Posted on 7/26/26 at 10:13 am to Bard
quote:
The vast majority of the hundreds of thousands of accountants and tens of thousands of IRS agents would need to learn to weld, do AC repair, etc
I get your point, but the vast majority of accountants are not tax accountants.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 10:22 am to BhamTigah
quote:They are during tax season.
but the vast majority of accountants are not tax accountants.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 10:34 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
They are during tax season.
I’ve been in accounting for 30+ years and have never been paid to do a tax return. If you limit it to public accountants, you would be correct, though the larger firms are usually split between full time auditors and full time tax professionals with the audit side typically bigger. Beyond that, there are far more corporate accountants and other types than there are accountants in public accounting.
Again, this doesn’t change the premise of Bard’s statement as there would still be a lot of accountants scrambling for work.
This post was edited on 7/26/26 at 10:36 am
Posted on 7/26/26 at 10:38 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
land value tax
So you never truly own land, and by extension anything built on the land.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 10:55 am to udtiger
quote:
Hate Obama, but he had one thing right...everyone should have skin on the game.
Except he was completely full of shite and didn’t believe that.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 10:58 am to Ag Zwin
We need to go to a sales tax so everyone pays the same percentage.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 10:59 am to Ag Zwin
The worst thing they ever did, and it was on purpose, was to take taxes automatically out of paychecks.
If they waited for the end of the year and gave one tax bill, or even quarterly like us small business owners, there would be revolts nationwide.
Most people don’t notice it and think of a tax refund as a bonus. Make it a yearly bill and see the lemmings go crazy.
But in the meantime you are correct every single person should pay income taxes if we’re going to have it
If they waited for the end of the year and gave one tax bill, or even quarterly like us small business owners, there would be revolts nationwide.
Most people don’t notice it and think of a tax refund as a bonus. Make it a yearly bill and see the lemmings go crazy.
But in the meantime you are correct every single person should pay income taxes if we’re going to have it
Posted on 7/26/26 at 11:15 am to Ag Zwin
How about a Flat 15% across the board and do away with some of these Business Tax Breaks. Want everyone to pay their fair share. How about we all pay the same % regardless of how much we make?
Posted on 7/26/26 at 11:30 am to deltaland
quote:
The sales tax should be higher on luxury goods and things like junk food and vices and lower on necessities, healthy food, and supplies and equipment for businesses.
frick that.
I don’t want government deciding what’s good and bad.
Posted on 7/26/26 at 11:31 am to Zgeo
Love this but the most powerful voting block ever (boomers) will never give up their Medicare and social security welfare. Total luxury boomer communism will remain undefeated.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 7/26/26 at 11:32 am
Posted on 7/26/26 at 12:41 pm to VOR
quote:
Denmark, Norway, Sweden and The Netherlands have income taxes that people complain about, but based on my conversations with the citizens, nobody wants to fundamentally change the system. They’re content…
They tax the shite out of the poor because they use the most resources.
You really don’t know anything- do you?
Posted on 7/26/26 at 4:17 pm to Swamp Angel
quote:
how do you propose that wealthy people don't have to spend money when times are tough, but poorer folks do?
I think it might be you that needs to lay off the drugs.
I didn't say rich people don't need to spend money when they want to cut back. I am saying if you are making 200k a year or even 2 million a year. You have the ability to only spend the same amount of money as a poor person. When you are living paycheck to paycheck you don't have any way to cut back.
So the rich guy spends 200k a year. The poor person spends 30K a year. Next year the rich guy can only spend 30k a year also.
Hypothetical but the point stands. If the rich guy cuts back to 100K that can affect the when enough people start cutting back and saving instead of spending what they normally spend.
Popular
Back to top


1









