Favorite team:
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:917
Registered on:6/13/2025
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

Did Aristotle ever have to deal with a violent Islamic caliphate?
Not that I am aware of. If they cannot be negotiated with and will make no concessions, what is the solution in your opinion, given that both their remaining military assets and regime(?) are extremely decentralized?
quote:

Which allows the weak to reorganize the murderous regime leading to more war
Sorry, I was just paraphrasing Aristotle.
quote:

Sounds like something a pragmatist would ask
Well…that phrase is very non-specific, yes?
quote:

finishing Iran for good
What does this mean specifically?
At this point, who is the regime, how is it changed, and what does the new one look like?
quote:

goat banger's
A reference to the regime or general population?
I personally believe two things are possible, and they are intertwined. President Trump (and he alone) has the power to end this war and bring Israel to heel.
I am not going to read through the other ~10 threads about this guy because I had really never heard of him until the talk of his resignation. I watched the interview. This guy is REALLY MAGA. If anyone thought he was insulting President Trump then you didn’t watch it. If anything, he confirmed what most of the President’s supporters believe about him. He basically says that the Iranian regime is scared of Trump, they call off their proxies concerning American interests when he is in office, and this ‘war’ does NOT have the hallmarks of the President’s beliefs concerning war or Iran.

If the things he says about Israeli ‘intelligence’ is true, then a lot of things begin to make sense…such as the President’s recent post about Israel bombing energy facilities and the comments last year when he said “they (Israel) don’t know what the frick they’re doing” (during the 12 day war).
quote:

There is a blood debt that has to be paid.
We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry would break the strongest cords of our constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
quote:

I'm not opposed to the theory that 6M is too high, but it's clearly at least 1M I'll ask my question from page 1 again What level of genocide is acceptable to avoid focusing so much efforts on this particular debunking?
I have read a ton of books on WW1 & 2. Several well sourced guys come in with figures between 1 & 2 million (that they directly attribute to the Nazis). But yes, 2 million or 6 million, it is sort of a strange thing to haggle over. Another item that isn’t discussed as much is how (and why) they died. The answers to those questions do not just reveal that Hitler was psychotic but also very stupid.

He wants them to address it (them) and not doing so could cause loss of the midterms. What does he want them to actually do, though? I am sure he just wants a PSA, yes?
quote:

So the Lebanese government started rounding up and attacking Hezbollah themselves. It's either that or let Israel keep bombing civilian infrastructure, which is what they were doing.
Just to be clear, who was bombing civilian infrastructure? (and where?)
quote:

their silence on this problem is deafening
His silence would be welcomed.
quote:

Full-steam ahead toward Iran's UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER
This sounds great in theory.
I have tried to give a little context in other threads and my inference when I heard it during the interview.

Hyperbolic, melodramatic, and hypothetical. Why would Iran surrender if they saw it this way? What then, would we have to nuke them?

I did not think for a moment that he meant our military was going to rape women or the U.S. was going to nuke Iran. Anyone who has listened to him knows that he chases these things a sensational end. He is a weird guy and has some bad takes. However, this is akin to one of those “Charlottesville” edits that they did with the President.
quote:

So, what did he say regarding U.S. soldiers raping persian women? That seems to be a crazy thing to make up for a clickbait headline. There had to be some mention of raping persian women. If not, WTF.
He never said or even hinted that he believed that would happen. They said this has historically happened to other nations when they surrendered unconditionally. This could be the potential mindset of Iranians who hate Americans or in general the paranoia of the unknown when ceding total control to the enemy. i.e. Why would they surrender (if they believed this way)? …at least this was my inference.

It took off from the notion that they found it kinda crazy that a call to unconditional surrender was made so quickly. That anything else than that now would be considered weakness from an international perspective.
quote:

Do your mental gymnastics with it as you see fit
No mental gymnastics. Hyperbole on his part, yes. The clip you showed is not the whole interview.
Lot of stuff going on in this thread and theology being put out there.

Just to make sure that I am not going to hell (hypothetically), do you HAVE to believe in demons and hell? Or, if you don’t believe in demons or hell, does it mean you are going there?
I actually listened to the entire interview. He didn’t say what your headline says in the way the headline implies…the Trump inclusion is just click bait bullshite.