- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Pragmatist2025
| Favorite team: | |
| Location: | |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 917 |
| Registered on: | 6/13/2025 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Iran dismisses cease fire deal…looks like we are A GO for bridge and power plant day!
Posted by Pragmatist2025 on 4/6/26 at 5:26 pm to High C
quote:Not that I am aware of. If they cannot be negotiated with and will make no concessions, what is the solution in your opinion, given that both their remaining military assets and regime(?) are extremely decentralized?
Did Aristotle ever have to deal with a violent Islamic caliphate?
re: Iran dismisses cease fire deal…looks like we are A GO for bridge and power plant day!
Posted by Pragmatist2025 on 4/6/26 at 1:33 pm to High C
quote:Sorry, I was just paraphrasing Aristotle.
Which allows the weak to reorganize the murderous regime leading to more war
re: Those not in favor of finishing Iran for good
Posted by Pragmatist2025 on 4/6/26 at 12:19 pm to Powerman
quote:Well…that phrase is very non-specific, yes?
Sounds like something a pragmatist would ask
re: Those not in favor of finishing Iran for good
Posted by Pragmatist2025 on 4/6/26 at 12:10 pm to Stidham8
quote:What does this mean specifically?
finishing Iran for good
re: How do you stop Iran holding the Straight of Hormuz hostage without regime change?
Posted by Pragmatist2025 on 4/6/26 at 12:08 pm to Kansas City King
At this point, who is the regime, how is it changed, and what does the new one look like?
re: Iran dismisses cease fire deal…looks like we are A GO for bridge and power plant day!
Posted by Pragmatist2025 on 4/6/26 at 11:42 am to hogcard1964
quote:A reference to the regime or general population?
goat banger's
re: Iran dismisses cease fire deal…looks like we are A GO for bridge and power plant day!
Posted by Pragmatist2025 on 4/6/26 at 11:25 am to sidewalkside
The strong can win a war but the powerful can organize the peace.
re: Israel says hold my beer on any cease fire talk.
Posted by Pragmatist2025 on 4/6/26 at 11:11 am to StrangeBrew
I personally believe two things are possible, and they are intertwined. President Trump (and he alone) has the power to end this war and bring Israel to heel.
re: Whether you agree or disagree with Tucker…
Posted by Pragmatist2025 on 3/19/26 at 3:12 pm to DeltaDoc
I am not going to read through the other ~10 threads about this guy because I had really never heard of him until the talk of his resignation. I watched the interview. This guy is REALLY MAGA. If anyone thought he was insulting President Trump then you didn’t watch it. If anything, he confirmed what most of the President’s supporters believe about him. He basically says that the Iranian regime is scared of Trump, they call off their proxies concerning American interests when he is in office, and this ‘war’ does NOT have the hallmarks of the President’s beliefs concerning war or Iran.
If the things he says about Israeli ‘intelligence’ is true, then a lot of things begin to make sense…such as the President’s recent post about Israel bombing energy facilities and the comments last year when he said “they (Israel) don’t know what the frick they’re doing” (during the 12 day war).
If the things he says about Israeli ‘intelligence’ is true, then a lot of things begin to make sense…such as the President’s recent post about Israel bombing energy facilities and the comments last year when he said “they (Israel) don’t know what the frick they’re doing” (during the 12 day war).
re: Official US/Israel vs Iran war thread
Posted by Pragmatist2025 on 3/12/26 at 4:23 pm to Auburn1968
quote:We have no government armed with power capable of contending with human passions unbridled by morality and religion. Avarice, ambition, revenge, or gallantry would break the strongest cords of our constitution as a whale goes through a net. Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.
There is a blood debt that has to be paid.
re: “The Painter” (Hitler) movement on social media
Posted by Pragmatist2025 on 3/9/26 at 4:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:I have read a ton of books on WW1 & 2. Several well sourced guys come in with figures between 1 & 2 million (that they directly attribute to the Nazis). But yes, 2 million or 6 million, it is sort of a strange thing to haggle over. Another item that isn’t discussed as much is how (and why) they died. The answers to those questions do not just reveal that Hitler was psychotic but also very stupid.
I'm not opposed to the theory that 6M is too high, but it's clearly at least 1M I'll ask my question from page 1 again What level of genocide is acceptable to avoid focusing so much efforts on this particular debunking?
re: Levin drops absolute truth bomb on X ahead GOP summit
Posted by Pragmatist2025 on 3/9/26 at 2:45 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
He wants them to address it (them) and not doing so could cause loss of the midterms. What does he want them to actually do, though? I am sure he just wants a PSA, yes?
re: What’s the off-ramp in Iran?
Posted by Pragmatist2025 on 3/9/26 at 2:14 pm to AlterEd
quote:Just to be clear, who was bombing civilian infrastructure? (and where?)
So the Lebanese government started rounding up and attacking Hezbollah themselves. It's either that or let Israel keep bombing civilian infrastructure, which is what they were doing.
re: Levin drops absolute truth bomb on X ahead GOP summit
Posted by Pragmatist2025 on 3/9/26 at 2:08 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:His silence would be welcomed.
their silence on this problem is deafening
re: New polling on Iran @Leftists / Never Trump Coalition
Posted by Pragmatist2025 on 3/9/26 at 1:32 pm to jbdawgs03
quote:This sounds great in theory.
Full-steam ahead toward Iran's UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER
re: Check in here if you fell for the Tucker lie and still want to stick to that lie.
Posted by Pragmatist2025 on 3/9/26 at 11:06 am to roadGator
I have tried to give a little context in other threads and my inference when I heard it during the interview.
Hyperbolic, melodramatic, and hypothetical. Why would Iran surrender if they saw it this way? What then, would we have to nuke them?
I did not think for a moment that he meant our military was going to rape women or the U.S. was going to nuke Iran. Anyone who has listened to him knows that he chases these things a sensational end. He is a weird guy and has some bad takes. However, this is akin to one of those “Charlottesville” edits that they did with the President.
Hyperbolic, melodramatic, and hypothetical. Why would Iran surrender if they saw it this way? What then, would we have to nuke them?
I did not think for a moment that he meant our military was going to rape women or the U.S. was going to nuke Iran. Anyone who has listened to him knows that he chases these things a sensational end. He is a weird guy and has some bad takes. However, this is akin to one of those “Charlottesville” edits that they did with the President.
re: Tucker doing his CIA mind tricks thing, says Trump means rape Iranian women for trophies
Posted by Pragmatist2025 on 3/9/26 at 10:50 am to BTROleMisser
quote:He never said or even hinted that he believed that would happen. They said this has historically happened to other nations when they surrendered unconditionally. This could be the potential mindset of Iranians who hate Americans or in general the paranoia of the unknown when ceding total control to the enemy. i.e. Why would they surrender (if they believed this way)? …at least this was my inference.
So, what did he say regarding U.S. soldiers raping persian women? That seems to be a crazy thing to make up for a clickbait headline. There had to be some mention of raping persian women. If not, WTF.
It took off from the notion that they found it kinda crazy that a call to unconditional surrender was made so quickly. That anything else than that now would be considered weakness from an international perspective.
re: Jesse Jackson, Jr. slams Clinton, Obama, and Biden -They Did Not Know My Dad!
Posted by Pragmatist2025 on 3/9/26 at 7:18 am to Timeoday
quote:Because?
You must not get out much.
re: Tucker doing his CIA mind tricks thing, says Trump means rape Iranian women for trophies
Posted by Pragmatist2025 on 3/8/26 at 7:23 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:No mental gymnastics. Hyperbole on his part, yes. The clip you showed is not the whole interview.
Do your mental gymnastics with it as you see fit
re: Raymond Arroyo: Why Exorcisms are on the rise
Posted by Pragmatist2025 on 3/8/26 at 7:20 pm to cajunangelle
Lot of stuff going on in this thread and theology being put out there.
Just to make sure that I am not going to hell (hypothetically), do you HAVE to believe in demons and hell? Or, if you don’t believe in demons or hell, does it mean you are going there?
Just to make sure that I am not going to hell (hypothetically), do you HAVE to believe in demons and hell? Or, if you don’t believe in demons or hell, does it mean you are going there?
re: Tucker doing his CIA mind tricks thing, says Trump means rape Iranian women for trophies
Posted by Pragmatist2025 on 3/8/26 at 6:59 pm to hawgfaninc
I actually listened to the entire interview. He didn’t say what your headline says in the way the headline implies…the Trump inclusion is just click bait bullshite.
Popular
0












