- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I don’t know whether the election was stolen, as many of y’all say
Posted on 6/11/22 at 11:04 pm to baybeefeetz
Posted on 6/11/22 at 11:04 pm to baybeefeetz
Whine about it on a message board and pretend you care
Posted on 6/11/22 at 11:04 pm to 1BIGTigerFan
I do get it. That’s why I said I don’t expect them to do anything but maybe continue to just hammer the opposition. And by that I mean demogogue the race issue.
Posted on 6/11/22 at 11:05 pm to lsuguy84
You’re really starting to hurt my feelings.
Posted on 6/11/22 at 11:05 pm to baybeefeetz
quote:
The trust needs to be fixed.
It won’t be it has been damaged beyond repair
The most truthful thing Trump ever said over the last 6ish years was that the MSM is the enemy of the people. Unless there’s a seismic shift in the way things operate with them I will consider them this country’s greatest threat until the day I die
Posted on 6/11/22 at 11:08 pm to baybeefeetz
It’s more about satiating your need for attention. Figure it out.
Posted on 6/11/22 at 11:10 pm to baybeefeetz
If election results are not transparent and auditable, if ballots do not have clear chain of custody and lack things like signatures, dates, and postmarks to establish identity of voters and validity, then how do we know who was elected?
If a scientist develops a hypothesis, then an experiment to observe it which supports the hypothesis, but cannot repeat the results of that experiment, then is there any real support for that hypothesis? No.
If an election is not verifiable, then it is not an accurate measurement of voter intent. The mere opportunity for hypothetical bad actors to tilt elections makes the method unreliable. Elections CANNOT be unreliable.
The entire purpose of elections is that they provide a framework for peaceful transition of power where the losing side understands that they lost and can accept the result. If the legitimacy of those results are in doubt, truly peaceful transition of power cannot occur as the losing side will feel cheated rather than defeated. This destabilizes democratic societies, leading to sectarian violence and despotism as the justified basis for conceding elections is eroded.
If a scientist develops a hypothesis, then an experiment to observe it which supports the hypothesis, but cannot repeat the results of that experiment, then is there any real support for that hypothesis? No.
If an election is not verifiable, then it is not an accurate measurement of voter intent. The mere opportunity for hypothetical bad actors to tilt elections makes the method unreliable. Elections CANNOT be unreliable.
The entire purpose of elections is that they provide a framework for peaceful transition of power where the losing side understands that they lost and can accept the result. If the legitimacy of those results are in doubt, truly peaceful transition of power cannot occur as the losing side will feel cheated rather than defeated. This destabilizes democratic societies, leading to sectarian violence and despotism as the justified basis for conceding elections is eroded.
Posted on 6/11/22 at 11:16 pm to baybeefeetz
I agree with you. The question the Jan 6 committee should be asking themselves what they did wrong instead because events like Jan 6 simply don't happen in a well-functioning system that represents its people
As for election fraud, it will never be proven and even if it was proven, it would be buried to the point where it may as well not have happened. That being said, with everything I know about voting patterns, turnout, etc. the numbers just don't make sense. Ohio doesn't go R+8 without Pennsylvania going at least R+.01
As for election fraud, it will never be proven and even if it was proven, it would be buried to the point where it may as well not have happened. That being said, with everything I know about voting patterns, turnout, etc. the numbers just don't make sense. Ohio doesn't go R+8 without Pennsylvania going at least R+.01
This post was edited on 6/11/22 at 11:23 pm
Posted on 6/11/22 at 11:22 pm to David_DJS
quote:
First, I have a very hard time believing there are 81 million Americans dumb or bent enough to have voted for the pedo. Second, everything is fake from these frickers. Name the issue or action the last couple of years that hasn't been utter bullshite. From Russia collusion to the Covid shitshow ... from unarmed blacks are being murdered by cops at volume to violent white supremacists behind every tree ... every fricking thing is made up bullshite. So, I think to myself - what are the chances the election is the one thing the Left is being honest about?
Preach brother! I have been saying this for a while…these leftist frick nuggets did every far fetched thing under the sun to get rid of Trump but were supposed to have played “above board” in the one area where they could pragmatically get rid of him? Suuuuuuure….
Posted on 6/11/22 at 11:25 pm to Bama Bird
Yeah that’s a good think you look at. What did Ohio and PA do in the last 10 elections?
Posted on 6/11/22 at 11:27 pm to kingbob
quote:A pre-employment pee sample has better safeguards than ballots do.
if ballots do not have clear chain of custody and lack things like signatures, dates, and postmarks to establish identity of voters and validity, then how do we know who was elected?
Posted on 6/11/22 at 11:35 pm to baybeefeetz
Both have been trending redder in the last 12 years. Ohio has been reliably more red than PA but difference is generally about 3% bluer in PA. What I find unbelievable is the turnout... Obama had a similar turnout and ended up winning Ohio twice. I guess my question is why did Detroit and Philadelphia care so much this time but Cleveland didn't because that certainly wasn't the case in 2008 and 2012
Posted on 6/11/22 at 11:38 pm to baybeefeetz
quote:
The point is not whether or not it was stolen.
That’s exactly the point. It was theft.
Trump won by a lot.
This post was edited on 6/11/22 at 11:39 pm
Posted on 6/11/22 at 11:39 pm to baybeefeetz
Somebody tired of idiots
Just in case, that is you
BTW you are really an idiot… start a topic about elections and say this
Just in case, that is you
BTW you are really an idiot… start a topic about elections and say this
quote:
I simply haven’t dug into the election fraud stuff.
This post was edited on 6/11/22 at 11:42 pm
Posted on 6/11/22 at 11:40 pm to baybeefeetz
“Stolen election” and “election fraud” as Trump defines it goes beyond what y’all are mostly talking about. It also very significantly encompasses “illegal” and/or unconstitutional expansions of voting regulations using covid as justification. I.e. election officials unilaterally allowing late mail in ballots to be counted, relaxing signature rules, etc etc. Those crucial aspects have for the most part been defeated and recalled through various avenues in some of the most key states. Hence the Democrats trying their little hearts out to pass federal voting legislation to replace those illegal and unconstitutional voting allowances they “enjoyed” last election night and immediately thereafter. And they failed to achieve it.
Thus they’ll be without those crucial avenues next go’round.
Thus they’ll be without those crucial avenues next go’round.
Posted on 6/11/22 at 11:47 pm to baybeefeetz
quote:
On some level it doesn’t matter who is right about that. The trust needs to be fixed.
You’re going to have to accept that it is beyond repair at this point. Those in charge now will make no concessions and will cede nothing.
Posted on 6/11/22 at 11:48 pm to baybeefeetz
Do you
Know the name Ruby freeman?
Know the name Ruby freeman?
Posted on 6/11/22 at 11:49 pm to baybeefeetz
The appearance of fraud is just as detrimental as actual fraud.
Posted on 6/12/22 at 12:29 am to baybeefeetz
quote:
I don’t know whether the election was stolen
I don't either,
But it is the most reasonable presumption given the circumstances.
Posted on 6/12/22 at 12:31 am to baybeefeetz
You should probably work on your critical thinking skills.
Posted on 6/12/22 at 12:39 am to baybeefeetz
quote:
baybeefeetz
I love that people are having less and less trust in government.
Do you think the government, especially the federal government, is redeemable?
Popular
Back to top



1






