0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How can LA voters hold their nose for Letlow, but Texas voters can't for Paxton?
Posted on 11/2/26 at 11:08 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 11/2/26 at 11:08 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I think a lot of people are saying they'd rather 6 years of a bad (DEM) Senator than 24+ of a bad (GOP) Senator. Davis or Talarico will last one term and can be replaced in 2032. Letlow and Paxton would be shitty for decades
After six years of Dems controlling Congress and they have impeached Trump, expanded the SC, investigated every R alive do you think enough will left?
Posted on 11/2/26 at 11:14 am to IamNotaRobot
quote:
I don’t think anyone who votes conservative changed their mind with Paxton on the ticket. I don’t think many independents who lean right look at Tararico and say this is what we want either. There are a shite ton of refugees from other blue states who will vote for Talarico because they are retarded and most are so flush with cash they don’t care about how liberal policies affect the middle class.
I was not at all motivated to vote because of Paxton. I was motivated to vote because of Talrico...and not wanting that to be my voice. Additionally, it's obvious how much outside money is being dumped into this race to flip a seat in my state. I can't go 10 minutes without an unsolicited text or commercial. That is on top of the transplants from blue states who bring their bad voting habits with them.
We've seen what just 4 years of a really bad agenda can do. I'm not taking that risk to make a stance against a primary result.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 11:36 am to loogaroo
quote:
The goal was to remove RINO's. What changed?
quote:
Letlow is an unqualified DEI candidate
quote:
Its about sending a message to GOP. Wake up or gtfo.
And yet, the only group responsible for putting her where she is, and the only group responsible for getting soneone better and more qualified in the position she is in now was the Republicans of Louisiana.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 11:38 am to loogaroo
Which Texas voters aren't voting for Paxton? My parents, both of my sisters and their husbands and their voting age children all voted for Paxton. The majority of my co-workers have already voted Paxton.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 11:40 am to jimjackandjose
quote:
Its about sending a message to GOP. Wake up or gtfo.
You forget the GOPe wants to lose. Why reward them?
Posted on 11/2/26 at 11:48 am to loogaroo
It was Jeb!s sons turn.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 11:49 am to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
You really think there's a chance she would go further left than her current GE opponent?
That's not the question. It's how far she'd be left of a 2032, 2038, etc. Republican
Posted on 11/2/26 at 11:50 am to Tiger Prawn
quote:
Ask Georgia how that's working out.
Georgia is bluish purple and getting more blue every cycle.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 11:53 am to MSMHater
quote:
Then we watched his corruption and sleazeball act and learned our lesson.
Lol, sure pal.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 11:55 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's not the question. It's how far she'd be left of a 2032, 2038, etc. Republican
I usually prefer addressing the current reality in elections versus some future hoped for hypothetical 6+ years down the road, but that's just me.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 12:07 pm to loogaroo
quote:
but Texas voters can't for Paxton?
Who says they aren’t - besides pundits and push pollers?
Posted on 11/2/26 at 12:08 pm to loogaroo
Letlow looks and probably smells better than Paxton.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 12:16 pm to LSUgrad88
quote:
I know. I was listening to a speech where Talarico talked about how he was checking out John Husted’s body and drooling over his arse. Wait, come to think of it, that wasn’t Talarico. Never mind.
Who was it?
Posted on 11/2/26 at 1:07 pm to Jon A thon
quote:
That is on top of the transplants from blue states who bring their bad voting habits with them.
and the 170,000 Hispanics in Texas who hit voting age since '24.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 1:09 pm to DarthRebel
Posted on 11/2/26 at 1:18 pm to loogaroo
quote:
The goal was to remove RINO's. What changed?
Paxton isn’t a RINO. He’s a corrupted dbag but he’s not a RINO.
And I voted for him now 3X
Posted on 11/2/26 at 1:31 pm to jimjackandjose
quote:
Its about sending a message to GOP. Wake up or gtfo.
Let's destroy our own country to send a message to politicians already wealthy enough to retire and will likely just move to an NGO, lobbyist, or media position.
That'll teach 'em.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 1:31 pm to loogaroo
It’s extremely important to not let Talarico get elected. Very important. It would be earth shattering to have the state of Texas elect this insane person. It would signal that years of illegal immigration & transplants from Blue States finally paid off in the victory the Left & the media have been desperately pushing for.
This post was edited on 11/2/26 at 1:34 pm
Posted on 11/2/26 at 1:40 pm to Hetfield
If the Texas GOP thought it were that important, they wouldn’t be running Paxton.
Posted on 11/2/26 at 4:42 pm to Bonkers119
quote:
Try again pal.
Thought we were talking Texas with the Paxton stuff, but you are correct - apologies.
I do not think it is going to matter through, when you look at the last two election cycles. Apparently election day voting matters in your state
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News