Started By
Message

re: Helen Andrews: Boomer men reaped moral rewards of DEI while inflicting costs on young

Posted on 7/27/26 at 4:21 pm to
Posted by toratiger
Member since Aug 2008
3673 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

Affirmative Action was way different than DEI. The way that AA worked was this: if 2 candidates were exactly equal in qualifications, give it to the minority and not the white guy. That is the way it was supposed to work.




That was the way it was suppose to work. But it did not work that way.


It covered women as well as minorities. And guess who was not cover. White males. And also guess who paid for those past wrongs........
White male "Boomers".
Posted by CitizenK
BR
Member since Aug 2019
16414 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 4:21 pm to
quote:

BS! Affirmative action, original DEI, Was around since the 70s.The boomers paid for it 1st.

It (AA) covered everyone but white males...but including white females.


Lots of minority business enterprises sprang up and made bank.

During the Superfund cleanup days, 1/8th Injun Joe Brown Trucking with the big orange trucks did most of the contaminated hauling for all projects

Houston Crushed Concrete was a woman owned business which made bank with all the concrete roads and buildings and resold for road base across the Houston area.

Black owned businesses dominated the asbestos abatement scene which boomed in the 1980s

A former coworker was still making bank, a decade aga, as a black owned business with government contracts, he subbed out 100% to other companies.

I can give many more examples of how minorities made bank due affirmative action.

Posted by BCvol
Member since Jan 2022
657 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 4:26 pm to
I have a boomer uncle that lost a job because of DEI in the 70s
Posted by Gifman
Captiva, FL
Member since Jan 2021
19475 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 4:29 pm to
Boomers frick everything up. It’s well known.
Posted by LSUbest
Coastal Plain
Member since Aug 2007
17328 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 4:30 pm to
Spoiled rotten millennials are entitled to everything.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140682 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 4:38 pm to
quote:

That is exactly correct.

The old white men sold out for the street cred and the praise, so they implemented DEI while keeping their own plum jobs.
quote:

Champagne
You are WAY better than this.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
56435 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

Boomers frick everything up. It’s well known.


100%

What I've been doing lately is going to large family gatherings where all the Boomer aunts, uncles, parents and grandparents gather. Once everyone settles in for the festivities I start letting them all know they suck, and how everything that's wrong in the world is because of Boomers. I do this as I eat their food and drink their libations.

I know that ^^^ seems kinda harsh but we get along even after I've unloaded on their Boomer asses. At the end of the day we all live and let live and leave on good terms and from what I can ascertain, I'm still in several estate wills.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
140682 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

Secondly, you date range of “65+” includes the 70,71,72,73,74,75,76 etc etc year olds. No one is walking about them.
Typos notwithstanding, the youngest "boomer" is > 62yrs old.

So when you attempt the ""point"" that the "date range of “65+” includes the 70,71,72,73,74,75,76 etc etc year olds," what in the world is your point?
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
49020 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 4:55 pm to
Because DEI is a scam, like the climate crisis. They just played you, bitch.
Posted by jimjackandjose
Member since Jun 2011
6774 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 5:02 pm to
Its a pretty factual statement for all boomers. Not just men

They felt guilty for mistreating the blacks when they were young so they jumped on these policies to feel better while destroying opportunities for their kids.
And then lectured us all about it.
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
56435 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

Secondly, you date range of “65+” includes the 70,71,72,73,74,75,76 etc etc year olds. No one is walking about them.
Typos notwithstanding, the youngest "boomer" is > 62yrs old.

So when you attempt the ""point"" that the "date range of “65+” includes the 70,71,72,73,74,75,76 etc etc year olds," what in the world is your point?



Ask the Boomer Bashers what generation was controlling academia when most Boomers were being introduced to leftist propaganda beginning in the late 50's through the early 80's? If Boomers are responsible for all that ails the US then who influenced he Boomers?

Here's the difference between Boomers and Boomer Bashers. The majority of Boomers never attended universities so they never got the level of leftist victimhood indoctrination that is so prevalent in many Americans under age 50.....it's always somebody else's fault.

It doesn't matter if you're a minority, if you're poor, if you're gender confused, if you're a wacko environmentalist, etc.... academia and pop culture has convinced tens of millions of Americans they're all victims. Today, many of these victims have decided it's the Boomer generation that's to blame for their lives being unsatisfactory or why their future is uncertain.
This post was edited on 7/27/26 at 5:16 pm
Posted by AtlantaLSUfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2009
27420 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 5:23 pm to
quote:

what is your point?

That the OP is correct. Boomers are spineless and have been in charge while the country has fallen into lunacy. Hiring/promoting unqualified DEI to keep their cush jobs is just another feather in their caps.

The generation that bought homes for $40,000 and sold them for $400,000. The last generation to have company pensions. Yet they still self-preserve as an whole and leave nothing for the younger generations behind them.

Not all of course, but just seems like the Hippies grew up into assholes.
Posted by Zgeo
Baja Oklahoma
Member since Jul 2021
3987 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 5:35 pm to
Not boomers….Dumacrats…..
Posted by Riverside
Member since Jul 2022
11318 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 5:41 pm to
Young white male here. We’re well aware of what was done to us by our fathers and grandfathers’ generations.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
24414 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 5:44 pm to
DEI didn’t happen organically.

It was driven by globalist money interests like Blackrock who took over boardrooms with their massive wealth, inserted activist board members who demanded these initiatives be implemented.

Then to ensure follow through they made executive compensation plans contingent in part on achieving hiring goals.

I watched it happen in real time at a previous stop.

It starts and begins with the WEF/globalist crowd like Larry Fink.
This post was edited on 7/27/26 at 5:45 pm
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
69414 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 5:50 pm to
“Boomers” are easy targets. This board loves them some scapegoats…
Posted by Victor R Franko
Member since Dec 2021
4109 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 5:51 pm to
Bull shite. I was in college in 70s had 2 older sisters in college a couple of years before me. Mother was attending night school college courses in early 70s. Plenty of women in college in the 70s, maybe more women than men during that decade. Affirmative Action was on going and strong in the 70s.

You have your decades confused!

Brave says....
In the 1970s, the gender ratio in U.S. college attendance shifted from a male majority to a female majority, reaching parity around 1980.

Early 1970s: Men still outnumbered women; for instance, in 1970, men held approximately 51.8% of total college enrollment among high school graduates, while women held 48.2%.
Mid-to-Late 1970s: Female enrollment surged, leading to a crossover. By 1976, women slightly outnumbered men (50.3% vs. 47.2% among recent graduates), and this trend solidified throughout the decade.
This post was edited on 7/27/26 at 5:56 pm
Posted by B747Tiger
Member since Jul 2026
430 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

It was driven by globalist money interests like Blackrock who took over boardrooms with their massive wealth, inserted activist board members who demanded these initiatives be implemented. Then to ensure follow through they made executive compensation plans contingent in part on achieving hiring goals.


Firms like BlackRock were simply doing what their customers wanted them to. A large portion of which are public pension funds like teachers pension funds
Posted by dalefla
Central FL
Member since Jul 2024
4621 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 5:54 pm to
I'm not sure current generations are going to make it when all of us boomers die off and they're left to their own devices. But for now we'll be the reason and they can find somebody else to blame later.
Posted by La Place Mike
West Florida Republic
Member since Jan 2004
31696 posts
Posted on 7/27/26 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

The way that AA worked was this: if 2 candidates were exactly equal in qualifications, give it to the minority and not the white guy.




Not how it worked.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram