- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Heh. Left wing libtards are gonna chat thier pink panties when they wake up to this....
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:04 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:04 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Every court who has assessed this case, including the Supreme Court, disagrees.
"Improper" equals "Illegal" today? Thought you realized the error?
1
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:04 am to dcbl
quote:
are you calling Bondi a liar?
The alternative is Trump is Bukele's bitch, which is much less likely than Bondi lying (as she's done a few times already)
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:05 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It would be easier to just bring him back
Naw. Some fig-assed judge would say “after all this poor saint has been through, he is restored to the United States and we must pay him $15 million.”
Judges are bitches these days. Amirite?
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:05 am to TigerFanatic99
quote:
Why did the administration say he was mistakenly reported?
Great unanswered question
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:05 am to Dock Holiday
quote:
"Improper" equals "Illegal" today? Thought you realized the error?
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:06 am to the808bass
quote:
Naw. Some fig-assed judge would say “after all this poor saint has been through, he is restored to the United States and we must pay him $15 million.”
Well this is starting to look like a melt.
quote:
Judges are bitches these days. Amirite?
Melt: confirmed:
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:06 am to roadGator
quote:
Great unanswered question
And ICE guy said that. He probably has some skin in the game.
A DOJ lawyer holdover said that. He has been vamoosed from his job.
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:07 am to SlowFlowPro
lol.
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:07 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The alternative is Trump is Bukele's bitch,
Would you agree there are other alternatives? Or does your choice of the reply "The alternative" imply it's the ONLY other reason?
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:08 am to the808bass
quote:
And ICE guy said that. He probably has some skin in the game.
A DOJ lawyer holdover said that. He has been vamoosed from his job.
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:09 am to SlowFlowPro
Do you think it was a “mistake?”
You evidently have some ability to divine what the Administration is really thinking.
You evidently have some ability to divine what the Administration is really thinking.
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:09 am to Dock Holiday
quote:
Would you agree there are other alternatives?
Sure, if Bukele was rejecting Trump, Trump could show his sincerity by canceling the contract with him and other agreements with him (similar to how he handled his tariff plan with other countries)
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:09 am to the808bass
quote:
That Abrego Garcia should’ve had a withholding of removal.
And yet, he did. The Administration was probably going to seek to have the hold removed so that the deportation to El Salvador could have been legal. Instead, there was "an administrative error," and Abrego Garcia was illegally deported to El Salvador.
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:10 am to the808bass
quote:
Do you think it was a “mistake?”
The DOJ could have amended their argument in writing at any point.
Update: they have not.
quote:
You evidently have some ability to divine what the Administration is really thinking.
Yeah it's called looking at their legal filings.
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:11 am to IvoryBillMatt
Thank you. And would you perhaps agree that the deportation of the guy was an inevitable outcome, all other circumstances aside? And as such, possibly that given the isolated nature of this type of situation under the current approach to immigration and deportation, that this could be considered more so a technical mistake, rather than full fledged, intentionally malicious disregard of either/both statutory law and Constitutional law?
IF you find these aforementioned notions to be accurate, then how can it not be concluded that this incident is being extensively overblown, thus the most rational and productive response, right now at this point in time, being to move on (sure, having made a “historical note” and “lesson learned” to avoid this same exact line of actions and events in the future)? Who cares if a handful of posters on an anonymous internet message board persist in views on the matter that you find asinine. That has zero bearing on the actual President, who, sure, should ALWAYS endeavor to “do better,” as a general concept - shouldn’t we all. That applies to everyone. Bottom line is there’s many more fish to fry, a lot of work and a little bit of time. Move on. And do better. All of us, Trump included. I doubt very seriously he himself would disagree with that premise.
IF you find these aforementioned notions to be accurate, then how can it not be concluded that this incident is being extensively overblown, thus the most rational and productive response, right now at this point in time, being to move on (sure, having made a “historical note” and “lesson learned” to avoid this same exact line of actions and events in the future)? Who cares if a handful of posters on an anonymous internet message board persist in views on the matter that you find asinine. That has zero bearing on the actual President, who, sure, should ALWAYS endeavor to “do better,” as a general concept - shouldn’t we all. That applies to everyone. Bottom line is there’s many more fish to fry, a lot of work and a little bit of time. Move on. And do better. All of us, Trump included. I doubt very seriously he himself would disagree with that premise.
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:12 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The DOJ could have amended their argument in writing at any point.
Oh. You really think that they accidentally deported this guy. Ok. I stand corrected.
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:12 am to the808bass
quote:
Oh. You really think that they accidentally deported this guy.
Nope. Strawman.
You're flailing.
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:12 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
And yet, he did.
Yup. shite happens.
And now shite has happened to him.
Happy Easter.
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:14 am to SlowFlowPro
To clarify.
Do you think the Administration mistakenly deported him?
Or did they purposefully flout the order?
Do you think the Administration mistakenly deported him?
Or did they purposefully flout the order?
Posted on 4/18/25 at 8:15 am to the808bass
quote:
Do you think the Administration mistakenly deported him?
No, but that's not the relevant question.
The mistake was where they deported him.
Did they deport him to the wrong country? Yes
Was this in violation of the law? Yes
*ETA: let's see if you selectively curate this response
This post was edited on 4/18/25 at 8:16 am
Page 6 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News