Started By
Message

re: Guys...relax. We only seized 43 pounds of Fentanyl at the Canada border last year

Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:22 am to
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35945 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:22 am to
quote:

When I think back to all the pills I took in my late teens and early 20's this is pretty terrifying. I have no doubt that if I was born 20 years later, I'd be a victim of the opiate epidemic. I'm lucky that most of my drug use had ended before opiates burst on the scene.


Agreed. Some here think that is worthy of a death sentence. But allowing drug smugglers unfettered access to our young people is AOK!
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
182541 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:25 am to
quote:

RogerTheShrubber



No response?


BTW, I looked the punishment under Federal law for intent to distribute fentanyl

2 grams of fentanyl (5-year minimum sentence)
10 grams of fentanyl (10-year minimum sentence)

What would be unconstitutional about making the punishment even harsher?
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
44317 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:27 am to
quote:

I imagine the fentanyl that comes from Mexico is weighed in tons


Why?

You said that the southern border was secure, and that nobody would ever cross in remote areas.

The reality is, with our massive border with Canada, largely un-watched, has massive quantities as well.
Posted by Padme
Member since Dec 2020
9805 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:27 am to
quote:

at is worthy of a death sentence.



Yup, an old buddy who is now dead use to give me a few of his darvacet supply, we’d take a couple and drink beer. Helluva buzz. One of the more stupid mixes you can do to your body. We were too stupid and young to know the ramifications.
Posted by SlayTime
Member since Jan 2025
3738 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:27 am to
What is even scarier is terrorist, not fentanyl, are a bigger problem at the Canadian border vs Mexico.
Posted by Big EZ Tiger
Member since Jul 2010
26778 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:27 am to
1 kilogram of Fentanyl can kill up to 500,000 people. So, 43 pounds of Fentanyl could kill nearly 20 million people. No biggie.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10132 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:34 am to
Stout, thanks for the article. It sounds like Canada is addressing the problem, but could do better.

But couldn't the US do a better job? According to your article:

"...trafficking networks in Canada, the U.S. and Mexico have increased production of fentanyl and other drugs, and have been sending more offshore."

So is the U.S. responsible for all of the fentanyl produced here and "sent offshore"?

I think our "argument" is about played out. We agree about everything except fentanyl being the actual reason for the tariff on Canada...if it were, why would there be a lesser tariff on Canadian petroleum...is that Canadian industry somehow less responsible for fentanyl in the US than say Canadian timber? Also, if it were because of fentanyl, why wouldn't there be some condition/metric lifting the tariff if Canadian fentanyl coming into the USA were reduced/eliminated?

I agree that even small amounts of fentanyl are incredibly dangerous. I trust Trump has a good reason for imposing the same 25% tariff on (most) Canadian and Mexican goods. I just don't think fentanyl has anything to do with the real reasons for the tariff on Canada.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:39 am to
quote:

What would be unconstitutional about making the punishment even harsher?


Try it. Watch it get overturned.

All you will do is move people on to the next designer drug.
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
182541 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:41 am to
quote:

We agree about everything except fentanyl being the actual reason for the tariff on Canada


I never said this. It's a contributing factor. Trump never even said it was the actual reason. He listed many reasons.

Go look at how Canada and Mexico have both worked with China to create transshipments of Chinese steel to avoid USA tariffs on Chinese steel despite that being a specific condition of the USMCA. CA and MX have purposefully F'd us hard on that issue alone.
This post was edited on 2/2/25 at 10:42 am
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10132 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:43 am to
quote:

So you’re just like the idiot in the twitter feed. You don’t really understand the potency of fentanyl and just think “43 lbs isn’t a lot.”



Of course, I understand the potency of Fentanyl. The "relative" was compared to Mexico which received the same tariff despite 400 times as much Fentanyl seized at the southern border.

Fentanyl = very bad. Canadian Fentanyl being the true reason for the 25% tariff = very unlikely in my opinion. Good for you if you think differently.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
71226 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Try it. Watch it get overturned.


I believe this is the part some of us are looking to you to expound on.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
71226 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:45 am to
quote:

Canadian Fentanyl being the true reason for the 25% tariff = very unlikely in my opinion.


This seems like the straw man you've chosen to destroy. Sorry if I missed the group of people saying fentanyl was the sole reason for the tariffs. We know for a fact Trump never said it, so it's an odd point for you to focus your entire coy act on, in my opinion.
Posted by supadave3
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2005
32176 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:49 am to
quote:

Yup, an old buddy who is now dead use to give me a few of his darvacet supply, we’d take a couple and drink beer. Helluva buzz. One of the more stupid mixes you can do to your body. We were too stupid and young to know the ramifications.


Same here. I always looked forward to the weekend that he got his script filled. I'd pay for it because he was always broke and we'd party for a few days. Hed sell a few, pay me back and we'd do it again the next month. At least we know that they were legit pills though, straight from the pharmacy.

I never really developed a problem because it was only a once per month thing, I didn't seek out more percs after that weekend.

For the record, my friend is also presumed dead now. Years after our arrangement ended, he ended up homeless in Washington State but would check in with me occasionally from a coffee shop wifi. Neither myself or his family have heard from him in several years now.

I'e been around drugs for much of my youth and early adulthood. The grip that opiates grabbed it's users was unlike anything I've ever seen. I'm very glad that they were never my drug of choice. I was a chronic alcoholic though, and that poison was going to kill me until I finally put the bottle down 8 years ago.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
10132 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:50 am to
quote:

I never said this. It's a contributing factor. Trump never even said it was the actual reason. He listed many reasons.



I'm glad we stuck with it, then. We're in complete agreement. And thanks for the update on listing many reasons.

The clip I saw has President Trump saying (paraphrasing) "I'm imposing this 25% tariff on Canada and Mexico because of the amount of Fentanyl coming across the borders." I knew he had discussed unfair and unbalanced trade with Canada. I had NOT seen him specifically tie the Canadian tariff to anything OTHER than Fentanyl.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35945 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:54 am to
quote:

had NOT seen him specifically tie the Canadian tariff to anything OTHER than Fentanyl.


There’s only a thread about it on the first page. Ironic that you are accusing Trump of being disingenuous since your schtick is fake as shite.
Posted by Robin Masters
Birmingham
Member since Jul 2010
35945 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 10:58 am to
quote:

I'e been around drugs for much of my youth and early adulthood. The grip that opiates grabbed it's users was unlike anything I've ever seen. I'm very glad that they were never my drug of choice. I was a chronic alcoholic though, and that poison was going to kill me until I finally put the bottle down 8 years ago.


Sacklers found a way to sell heroin legally with the endorsement of the FDA that it was safe and nonhabit forming.

Opiate addiction is not a moral or character deficiency, it’s a physiological certainty if you take it for any length of time.
Posted by VOR
New Orleans
Member since Apr 2009
68833 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 11:01 am to
“Liberalism”, whatever that means. Are you just trying to refer to a point of view that you think is to the left of yours?
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
122919 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 11:04 am to
Are you a centrist?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
299716 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 11:04 am to
quote:

believe this is the part some of us are looking to you to expound on.


To make possession severe enough to deter use, you would have to have draconian sentencing, which will never fly for some possession.

As it stands now, people are will ing to take the risks, even of death... So it would have to be uber severe.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
128846 posts
Posted on 2/2/25 at 11:05 am to
That’s what we seized. How much came through?
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram