Started By
Message

re: Elon Musk played a great card today

Posted on 5/13/22 at 9:37 pm to
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
30112 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 9:37 pm to
Yeah what would be Elon’s winnings in under this scenario, “playing Trumpkins” scenario? I’m having a little trouble with that one too.
This post was edited on 5/13/22 at 9:41 pm
Posted by 6R12
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2005
8647 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 9:42 pm to
Destroy it and let him save his money for the next takeover
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
46074 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 9:53 pm to
quote:

Today Musk commented that buyout proceedings would be impacted until the issue of per cent bots was clarified. Thats a primary measure of company value



If Musk stays focused on wringing the woke filth out of Twitter’s corporate structure there’s a decent bet he made a good investment choice.
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 9:57 pm to







Posted by KAGTASTIC
Member since Feb 2022
7989 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 10:08 pm to
I'm left wondering why he did this and came out with saying Trump shouldn't run in 24. Just odd timing
Posted by VolcanicTiger
Member since Apr 2022
5933 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 10:20 pm to
My unfairly banned account was reinstated nearly instantly.

I think I got booted a few years ago for saying "bitch" and was reported for misogyny. Censors were probably happy to have an excuse to boot a conservative.
Posted by JumpingTheShark
America
Member since Nov 2012
22902 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

Sarbox


People in the know call it SOX bro
Posted by tadman
Member since Jun 2020
3815 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 11:05 pm to
quote:

Can't decide if I'd more enjoy watching Twitter being destroyed or being taken over and cleaned up by Musk.


When Enron went under, others bought the power plants. Same thing will happen to Twitter. You will see an implosion but the platform is too valuable to just close up. Even if half the place is bots, the revenue in 2020 was $3.2b.
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
18640 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 11:36 pm to
quote:

People in the know call it SOX bro



Who cares? I haven't had to deal with Sarbanes Oxley since 2012 thankfully. I have intentionally stayed away from public companies.
Posted by DesScorp
Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
6497 posts
Posted on 5/13/22 at 11:41 pm to
quote:

Can't decide if I'd more enjoy watching Twitter being destroyed or being taken over and cleaned up by Musk.


I would absolutely love to see Twitter utterly destroyed, then the IP bought on the cheap by Musk where he turns it into Shitpost.com
Posted by Logician
Grinning Colonizer
Member since Jul 2013
4513 posts
Posted on 5/14/22 at 12:03 am to
quote:

said it was people leaving twitter due to Elon
lol not a frickin chance that many people left, all at once. It was a bot purge.

None of them left twitter, just like they didn’t leave the country when trump won.
Posted by McChowder
Hammond
Member since Dec 2006
5227 posts
Posted on 5/14/22 at 12:18 am to
quote:

should it be a a funny number reported in the annual report, twitter could quickly become the next Enron . every body gets hosed, secrets are blown wide open and even the corporate out side accounting firm go poof.

You are going to see a massive exodus (as far as numbers go) in the lead up to Musk taking control and they will blame the losses on Musk in the process.
Posted by Doctor Strangelove
Member since Feb 2018
2963 posts
Posted on 5/14/22 at 3:02 am to
Charles Payne with FBN said that if it is determined that more than 5% of the users are determined to be bots it would severely impact the tender offer and force a renegotiation or termination of the stock buyout. He likened it to a retail store reporting 5% loss per year due to theft, damage, etc., then finding out later that the number is really 20%.
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
38862 posts
Posted on 5/14/22 at 3:22 am to
quote:

He's not buying Twitter. He never was.

Played you Trumpkins like fools.


Man, this is a stupid post.
Posted by arcalades
USA
Member since Feb 2014
19276 posts
Posted on 5/14/22 at 5:44 am to
quote:

Charles Payne with FBN said
you need to quit listening to that scumbag. google how many times he's settled cases for pettling bad companies
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
39299 posts
Posted on 5/14/22 at 6:24 am to
quote:

google how many times he's settled cases for pettling bad companies

Pettling?
Posted by FredBear
Georgia
Member since Aug 2017
14993 posts
Posted on 5/14/22 at 6:46 am to
quote:

He's not buying Twitter. He never was.

Played you Trumpkins like fools.




I don't think you thought this through very well
Posted by Big EZ Tiger
Member since Jul 2010
24269 posts
Posted on 5/14/22 at 9:12 am to
quote:

He's not buying Twitter. He never was.

Played you Trumpkins like fools.

Seems like he is playing the Twitter board to me, but you're probably not smart enough to follow what is happening.
Posted by coachcrisp
pensacola, fl
Member since Jun 2012
30600 posts
Posted on 5/14/22 at 9:25 am to
quote:

I'm left wondering why he did this and came out with saying Trump shouldn't run in 24. Just odd timing

Why is it so hard to understand the guy wants a fair and honest site, but he doesn't think that Trump's the man to run for the office...damn the timing! It shows the importance he puts on his ethics.
Posted by WinnPtiger
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2011
23876 posts
Posted on 5/14/22 at 9:27 am to
quote:

He's not buying Twitter. He never was. Played you Trumpkins like fools.



cope
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram