Favorite team:USA 
Location:Grinning Colonizer
Biography:Yes
Interests:Yes
Occupation:Yes
Number of Posts:4958
Registered on:7/2/2013
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

I'm not watching naked men dancing anywhere. Sorry you can't say the same.
current talking points from moderates who skipped the main thread but commented here instead:

"if you notice them exposing their d*cks to kids, you're the degenerate queer"
Don't be shy. Be the first to provide a defense for parading around in public showing your d*ck to kids or for bringing your kids to a naked d*ck parade.

quote:

So you’re saying it confuses you that southern knuckleheads are once again becoming more brazen in racist rhetoric?


Kid killed in southdowns the other day
Shooting at Perkins Rowe last night
Girl killed at the mall recently, others shot
Bleedah and others shot in drive by at the mall entrance
Allie Rice murder still unsolved

it’s not the criminals becoming more brazen, it’s those damn white people noticing it. Let us kill without comment, you hick arse southern knuckleheads!!
quote:

Our neighborhood association was able to set up a security district with a private patrol by voting for a dedicated tax… It worked…


Cops for me, but not for thee

Enthusiastically defends the party of no cops and being soft on crime, then turns around and pays extra for private security at his home
Sincerest form of flattery or some such
quote:

You obviously missed my point


Assuming they have auto filters to remove really bad language, I’ll repeat…you are a fking queer
quote:

I will acknowledge that the guy was an a-hole
even in your attempt to be even-handed, the soy leaks from every pore

Why is the guy “an a-hole”? It wasn’t reported that he was pelting beads. He gave out beads with a doll attached to kids, and ONE family decided it was racist and caused what you admit is a nothingburger.

Why aren’t the race baiting, shite stirring parents the assholes?
sounds more like ICE hurt fig bunny's feelings
leftist yesterday: "words are violence, and charlie kirk deserved to die. there is no 1st amendment protection for hate."

leftist today: "this unhinged minority has every right to tell ICE how much he hates them. he's protected by the 1st amendment."
quote:

Agreed. There was contact. That’s not the debate.
geez, this is hard to keep up with

i'll attempt to summarize:

-mother of 3, just dropped the kids off at school
-stuffed animals in the glove box
-not protesting
-protesting but not interfering
-attended training on how to interfere but it's peaceful
-parked sideways but not blocking the road
-blocking the road but should have just detained her
-Ice has no authority to detain her
-should not have had real bullets
-should have shot the tires with real bullets
-didn't see him
-saw him but cut her wheels
-didn't hit him
-might have grazed him at 2 mph
-contact was made, but only caused bruising



quote:

First you murder them then you starve them, screw those American citizens. trump’s America, hurt his feelings and you’ll pay.
lol
First you steal their money and gaslight them if they notice, then you shoot them in the neck if they debate better than you, then you attempt to assassinate them if they might win a fair election. fricking queer filth.
“Boomer Facebook. Facebook hothead, boomer boomer echo chamber fox. Facebook fox boomer fox, echo, chamber, boomer fox hothead. “

—hippietiger, refuting video evidence that is contrary to his feelings
quote:

the result is no ability to be anything close to objective


quote:

He’s your typical ex military, gun loving, don’t know how to deal with PTSD hot head that is likely to pull the trigger when it wasn’t necessary
I'm asking if you thought I was deflecting in one of my responses, or were you admitting to your obvious deflection. Your ambiguous response was difficult to decipher. Simple question with no sass or ill intent. You should try it.
quote:

The irony there was that in itself was deflection and lacked anything close to substance
what was?
Deflect more.

I guess when you're surrounded by computers and other nerds all day, your insults tend to be more tech-related.
quote:

have you been drinking today?
all afternoon i've been drinking the tears and huffing the fear pheromones of emotional L-takers who cry at the sight of evidence. i've boofed so many of your abandoned narratives, i'll be high as frick til sunday morning, when i'll wake up and plunge all your refusals to answer any of my requests for proof of anything directly into my veins again
quote:

He’s your typical ex military, gun loving, don’t know how to deal with PTSD hot head that is likely to pull the trigger when it wasn’t necessary
These myopic viewpoints from IT techs in Boulder, CO that understand the hearts and minds of people they never met is astounding.

Contrast that with how I show you evidence from video, stillshots of faces and eyes, hard facts, and all the refuting that comes from over there in the Rockies is completely subjective hearsay based on nothing but feeling and conjecture, with a healthy dose of libel and slander.
quote:

don't take this the wrong way, but it seems like the only words you understand in this sentence are all, your (nice job on the spelling), for, are, and, by and the


Lot of faggy little words for "You're right. I don't have any facts to refute you." Just another sassy queer bringing his feelings to a facts fight.

Wave that white flag and come try again when you think of another fantastical hot take that I can thoroughly dismantle.
much like TX Tiger, facts scare the shite out of you. You can't refute the video or the screenshots. He won't even reply to the screenshots, just passes them right up and responds to anyone else instead. You at least respond, but with no evidence of anything, just feelings and fantasies. Show me the panic. Prove how she didn't notice him until the last second, or how she was scared.

"nuh uh"
-beaux duke, attorney at law