re: 'Due process' was stripped from illegals by President Clinton & Congress in the 1990s

When did the SCOTUS rule that the law in question was unconstitutional? Link the ruling so we can all read the opinions.

Or are you here just to rabble rabble, with no facts, while being SFPs little gay lap dog

quote:

---

Has the Supreme Court struck it down?

---

Nope and in fact has ruled it's legal.


Individuals placed in expedited removal generally have no right to challenge their deportation in federal court, thanks to jurisdiction-stripping provisions in the 1996 law which created the process.

This means that even where an immigration officer acted unlawfully in issuing an order of expedited removal, a noncitizen is severely restricted in their ability to challenge that decision. Individuals may only bring a lawsuit challenging their expedited removal order if they are a lawful permanent resident, or someone already determined to be a refugee or granted asylum, who has been wrongfully subject to expedited removal.

In 2020, the Supreme Court upheld this law, finding that it did not violate the right to habeas corpus or due process.

quote:

---

Is every citizen of the world covered under the US Constitution?

---

The only thing "covered under the US Constitution" is our government. The Constitution establishes our three branches of government, and sets forth what those branches can and cannot do.

Our government cannot infringe upon natural human rights and civil liberties that are necessary to ensure a free society. The whole point of the bill of rights is to limit our government and force it to recognize individual freedom

Natural human rights are inherent to everyone in the world, even those who live in countries that refuse to recognize these rights.

So, yes, come into the jurisdiction of our country, and our government is prevented from violating your inherent rights...you have the basic rights of free speech, freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, freedom from unreasonable search and seizure, etc.

And our government cannot deprive anyone of life, liberty, or property without due process of law. (and to be sure, telling someone to "go home" is depriving them of liberty).

Due process of law, however, simply means the government follows established procedures to ensure people are treated fairly and justly. It does not require full blown criminal trials for every person accused of entering the country illegally. Just follow the established rules which provide an opportunity for them to defend the allegation.

if it were a democrat president we wouldnt even know about it, but since its Trump the mainstream media is going crazy over sending illegals home

Obama, Clinton, Biden, deported many and no one blinked an eye.

Biden is supposedly documented telling them to send the violent gangs.

Obama, Biden, Democrats and most republicans don't give a rats arse about the people in the Ohio town thrown in a tizzy with Haitians overnight.

They wanted vile gang members to join up with hoodrat gangz to fight the working class. It didn't work out, the black and white gang members said GTFO to the S American gangz.

They want/wanted DESTABILIZATION and global order---- with the American President sitting in a cuck chair-- while -- they were getting sodomized with no lube.

The 5th Amendment asserts the rights of "no person," setting it apart from other amendments that specifically call out citizenship.

Don't you think using this universal language was deliberate to emphasize that these rights are inherent to all individuals, regardless of citizenship?

If you all believe so highly of the infallible founding fathers (even though it seems you guys only feel that way about the 2nd), you have to think using that language was intentional.

The "Rule of Law" will be the end of the US as we knew it as the judicial system winds itself into a knot.

Flood the country with illegals overnight, overwhelm the system, and the establishment fights like hell to make sure all have "due process" knowing we could never litigate millions of people.

But SFP is happy...

quote:

---

Why the sudden cries of due process? Everyone knows why.

---

As someone who has a career in this field, and vehemently disagree politically with 97% of the others in this field this is my biggest rub.

The termination of CHNV? Started under Biden, no news until Trump terminated.

Random pick ups of people? Biden re-started in early 2024, no federal judge blocked it.

Circumventing Lawful Pathway bar to asylum? No news articles, and it is way more restrictive than the Third Country Transit bar Trump had blocked in term 1.

Selective outrage from "advocates" suddenly stop when the right person is in the White House.

this is not a legal issue, its an administrative one. They are not citizens so administratively they must be removed.

They are not being charged with anything to make it a legal issue. simple as that