BCreed1

I find nothing wrong with this post. This is what a voter should always do. Break it down to pros and cons to see which is the best.

Stupidest thing I have read today. There is no split. Period. 1% of paid influencers does not make up the 99% of the GOP.

Yes it was. The short term is well worth the ending outcome.

quote:

---

They aren't recognized as a race anywhere in the world because they are a religion with different races of people

---

This is not true. There are 12 tribes of Jews. Yes, they do sometimes marry outside of their own race and religion does not mean the are not a race. All races do that.


What you are saying is there is no black race because they married outside their race.

quote:

---

quote:
Massie is a blowhard media hoor



The fat orange dipshit you worship isn't?

---

Maybe, but he gets shite done.

quote:

---

H.R. 2356 (The Dual Loyalty Disclosure Act)

---

The bill amends the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971. It requires candidates for federal office (except nominees for Vice President) who hold citizenship in any country other than the United States to disclose that dual citizenship — including the name of the other country — in their official statement of candidacy filed with the Federal Election Commission (FEC). This information would be public.

quote:

---

and of course there's not much support from Congress to cut off funding for themselves.

---

The bill did nothing to stop it. It wasn't even it's purpose. It's just an expansion of federal gov right.....

quote:

---

Milei is showing the world how real cuts are done

---

He does not have our system of Gov.

quote:

---

In short, the plan is to take in more taxes by the creation of higher paying jobs and putting more people to work. There are other aspects but that is the major part of it.

---

Yeah, not sure why people do not listen and only hear what they want to hear. Trump's stated approach to reducing the federal deficit (as of mid-2026) centers on a combination of economic growth, targeted spending restraint, tariffs, and government efficiency reforms. His administration emphasizes dynamic effects from growth.

Here's the plan in more detail:

1-
Economic Growth to Boost Revenues
The centerpiece is faster GDP growth through:
Permanent extension (and in some cases expansion) of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) via the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) passed in 2025.

-Broad deregulation.

-Increased domestic energy production.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent’s “3-3-3” framework aims for 3% real GDP growth, a 3% deficit-to-GDP ratio, and an additional 3 million barrels of oil per day by 2028. The White House argues that stronger growth will generate enough additional tax revenue to meaningfully shrink deficits as a share of the economy.

White House / OMB view: The combination of OBBBA, tariffs, deregulation, and DOGE-driven efficiencies will cut the deficit nearly in half by 2034 (to ~3.2% of GDP) and bring debt-to-GDP down to 94%. They highlight dynamic growth effects and claim primary deficits could flip to surpluses.

No he didn't. He signed off on the Biden budget

First... History is your friend. History extends back more than 1 or 2 decades.


So here we go:

The Federal Reserve officially adopted 2% as its explicit, long-run inflation target on January 25, 2012.

Prior to that it was:

An informal/implicit understanding that around 2% was desirable as far back as the mid-1990s... Key word AROUND.

1950s & 1960s ? No explicit inflation target existed. The goal was vague “price stability.”


New Business

Applications (the broadest measure) is way up and on record pace. 2025 set a new all-time high in applications. 5.65 Million new applications. From Jan 2026 to March 1.52 Million.... up 20% from the previous year. In other words, this year will reach another all time high.

But what does that mean? It mean that last year 5.65 Million businesses applied for the mandatory EIN. That means jobs.

Actual New Employer Businesses (Projected Formations)

Monthly pace has been stable at roughly 28,000 – 30,000 projected new employer businesses per month in 2025–2026.



Manufacturing added +15,000 jobs in March. PMI registered 52.7% (unchanged from March). This marks the 4th consecutive month of expansion.

Apple ? $600 billion over four years in U.S. manufacturing and supplier partnerships (largest-ever U.S. commitment from the company).
Nvidia ? $500 billion pledge for AI chip and infrastructure production entirely in the U.S. (some production already underway in Arizona).
Johnson & Johnson ? $55 billion in new U.S. manufacturing and R&D.
AstraZeneca ? $50 billion
Bristol Myers Squibb ? $40 billion
GSK ? $30 billion
Stellantis (Jeep, Ram, Dodge) ? $13 billion to expand U.S. production
GlobalFoundries ? $16 billion to reshore advanced semiconductor manufacturing
John Deere ? $20 billion over the next decade in U.S. expansion and new factories
General Motors ? $4 billion+ to shift more production to U.S. plants

There are dozens more announcements in semiconductors, pharmaceuticals, autos, steel, and appliances — many citing tariffs, supply-chain security, and policy incentives as factors.


Nobody in their right mind thought it would be fixed that soon.