Started By
Message

re: Director of National Counterterrorism resigns due to Iran conflict

Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:23 am to
Posted by GetmorewithLes
UK Basketball Fan
Member since Jan 2011
22975 posts
Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:23 am to
quote:

Adios Good riddance. Iran should have been dealt with years ago.


Agreed, I have had a few conversations recently about the big picture in the ME that nobody seems to want to discuss.

Iran is/was the lynchpin of most all terrorism in the ME and even beyond. People are talking about how Cuba is cratering with the loss of support from Venezuela and Iran. Well look at all the terror groups who are running out of bullets and soldiers since Iran got flattened…

Hezbollah
Hamas
PLO
ISIS
Al Queda
Houtis
Taliban ( not sure this one is connected)
Syria Assad regime
And NK

So dont think this is just about Israel.None of the major countries in the ME are behind Iran because they are subverting every muslim govt in the region.

edit: add aljazeera article that explains most of this

https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2026/3/16/the-us-israeli-strategy-against-iran-is-working-here-is-why
This post was edited on 3/17/26 at 5:10 pm
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37608 posts
Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:23 am to
Oh my, you do have the childlike faith. Bless your heart.
Posted by Hayekian serf
GA
Member since Dec 2020
4215 posts
Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:23 am to
Kent’s a good man—I was in Iraq at the same time he was.

Side note- His wife was killed in a suicide bombing.

He’s a staunch anti-interventionist, and given what he’s been through, it’s not hard to understand why he resigned.

Say what you want about him, but the guy served in some of the worst conditions in some of the most badass units out there. Standing by your beliefs—whether people agree or not—takes integrity.
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
26297 posts
Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:24 am to
quote:

How about the JCOS Chair Gen. Dan Caine?

In before “Dan Cuck” from the Trump-firsters.

It’s amazing (and frustrating) to watch how people will justify whatever he does, no matter how much it conflicts with what he said in the past.

(This is where I get called a leftist, which would be laughed out of the room by anybody who actually knows me.)
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
20317 posts
Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:25 am to
quote:

uestionable low hanging fruit explanation


Okay, but this shite doesnt help...


Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
37608 posts
Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:26 am to
The MAGA don't want integrity, they want obedience and loyalty to their resentment and retribution.
Posted by BluegrassCardinal
Kentucky
Member since Nov 2022
2140 posts
Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:26 am to
This is really annoying the Mark Levin chicken hawk crowd.
Posted by Willie Stroker
Member since Sep 2008
16656 posts
Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:27 am to
quote:

Nobody with any info regarding the available intelligence believes that we were under an imminent threat. The halfhearted congressional briefings were not convincing in the least…

Iran obviously knew our traditional justification is to wait for evidence of being an imminent threat or as retaliation to an overt and highly deadly act. It wasn’t just us, it was the same justification embraced by the rest of the world, except Russia.

Iran also knew that they were getting away with the proxy model of using useful idiot factions of pawns with grievances served as a successful distraction. Under that model they could inflict damage and death while also fueling growth of other factions while they continued to pursue the ultimate weapons.

They knew that once they obtained a nuclear weapon and long range ballistic missiles, they would become untouchable.

They also knew that as long as they maintained the perception of not being an imminent threat, they would likely continue to be free to stockpile and develop advanced weaponry up to and include nuclear weapons. Most world leaders as they saw it would not have the balls to stop them because such an endeavor would not likely carry much support in the global community (due to traditional justifications for “pre-emptive” military action.

We had a long line of presidents and leaders who knew this was Iran’s strategy and none were willing to risk political capital to do what must be done. Until a non-traditional politician who doesn’t give a shite about political capital came along.
Posted by Two0Five
Member since Oct 2025
334 posts
Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:29 am to
I would like to know who he, as director of our national counterterrorism agency, believes are actual terrorists threats.
Posted by Zchlsu
Twin Peaks, Washington
Member since Jan 2011
7519 posts
Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:29 am to
Which makes it wild people want to destroy his character because he isn't Trump first or "Team Trump"
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
55593 posts
Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:32 am to
quote:

He’s right. All of the “greatest ally” people will deny it but we absolutely went to war because Israel told us to

That’s not what his letter said. It said Israel lobbied us to do it and implied that they tricked us into it. That is very different from “told us to”.

The rightness or wrongness of this war will be determined by two things, one of which we might never truly know. They are: How likely was Iran to develop a nuclear tipped missile in the next five years or so? And how painful will this war be for America?

The first of those will never be known, with certainty, by most US citizens. The second will play out over the next few months. I’ve got my popcorn, and I think my team is going to win.
This post was edited on 3/17/26 at 10:33 am
Posted by RummelTiger
Official TD Sauces Club Member
Member since Aug 2004
93639 posts
Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:32 am to
quote:

Lick that boot, boy!


Derp.
Posted by Pettifogger
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Feb 2012
87383 posts
Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:33 am to
To be clear, I think the root of the idea - that Israel would push us into conflicts that serve their interests with less than truthful motives and information - is probably true.

I just don't really think we go in with eyes shut. I think we know Israel's game pretty well.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
70537 posts
Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:33 am to
No, I don’t. And it is why I have been skeptical this entire time. As a previous poster said “this isn’t routine surgery”. We don’t know if it will be successful or make the problem worse. We don’t have a clear time table for recovery.

I understand why they felt now made sense:

Russia is distracted in Ukraine
Proxies in Lebanon and Gaza are seriously weakened and the Houthis in Yemen are not at full strength either.
Proxy in Syria has been fully neutralized
Ally in Venezuela has been sidelined
Iranian people seem primed for change due to brutal crackdowns on peaceful protests

Their allies cannot help them, the people want to overthrow them. The rationale is there. This is probably the most vulnerable the regime has been in decades.

Still a bad idea. Even under the best of circumstances, it’s still a massive gamble with minimal upside for the American people.
This post was edited on 3/17/26 at 10:40 am
Posted by The Baker
This is fine.
Member since Dec 2011
20317 posts
Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:36 am to
quote:

To be clear, I think the root of the idea - that Israel would push us into conflicts that serve their interests with less than truthful motives and information - is probably true.

I just don't really think we go in with eyes shut. I think we know Israel's game pretty well.


Agreed.

But Israel's game likely includes Kompromat and Bribery... which short circuits American decision making... This is my concern.
Posted by geauxEdO
Member since Aug 2017
257 posts
Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:37 am to
it’s not a conspiracy theory to say Netanyahu lobbied Trump to get involved.

Yes, Iran is obviously a bad actor. But does it warrant an act of war? That’s the question at heart. Oh no, they “support” Venezuela so therefore we need to bomb them?
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
38423 posts
Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:38 am to
So he did not know anything about sleeper cells in the US that came in under FJB? Seems like a Counterterrorism guy would know something about that. How about the constant pain the proxy groups Iran funded? I don't know about the timing because this should have been done years ago.
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
47220 posts
Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:40 am to
Good. Israel and Saudi Arabia both wanted Iran nerfed.

It’s the right thing to do.
Posted by Arkaea79
Member since Sep 2022
1094 posts
Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:40 am to
Guess he missed the part where Iran has been directly responsible for thousands of American deaths.

Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
23397 posts
Posted on 3/17/26 at 10:41 am to
quote:

Iran is/was the lynchpin of most all terrorism in the ME and even beyond.

Iran was funded by Obama and John Kerry.

The globalists are the issue, Iran is just a useful proxy to destabilize the west.

We should be addressing the globalists domestically via the DOJ but not one of them has gone to prison.
Jump to page
Page First 6 7 8 9 10 ... 24
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 24Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram