- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Contrary to Barr's view, DoJ issues Obstruction indictment w/o underlying crime
Posted on 5/7/19 at 7:58 am to rumproast
Posted on 5/7/19 at 7:58 am to rumproast
ATTENTION tigerinDC09
I assume you missed rumproast’s accurate quoting of Barr that proves you are full of shite in your portrayal of “Barr’s view” in your subject title.
It’s on page 2 and was posted over 30 minutes ago.
To save you effort, since you were to lazy to source it yourself, I’ll quote rumproast for you.
I’m sure you would wish to publicly admit that you incorrectly stated Barr’s view. Go for it.
I assume you missed rumproast’s accurate quoting of Barr that proves you are full of shite in your portrayal of “Barr’s view” in your subject title.
It’s on page 2 and was posted over 30 minutes ago.
To save you effort, since you were to lazy to source it yourself, I’ll quote rumproast for you.
quote:
Here's Barr's quote: quote: While not determinative, the absence of … evidence [of collusion] bears upon the President’s intent with respect to obstruction.” That is from your Washington Post article. You (and the shite Post") ignore the words "While not determinative". There. This is exactly what ticks me off. If you were CNN espousing this blatant dishonesty, half the country would take it and run. (Not saying you are being dishonest. I suspect you saw this in some partisan article and assumed it to be true...even though it isnt.) A retraction would be nice though, to stop the cycle of b.s.
I’m sure you would wish to publicly admit that you incorrectly stated Barr’s view. Go for it.
0
Posted on 5/7/19 at 7:59 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
Mueller says he never looked into collusion with Russia, so how can he be found innocent of something Mueller explicitly says in his report he didn't consider?
He looked into conspiracy...because that's the legal term you fricking twat.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 8:00 am to tigerinDC09
Quick questions...
Did Hillary commit any crimes with the classified emails on her private server?
Did Obama weaponize the FBI, CIA, etc. to spy on his opponents/foes for political gain?
Quick comment...
You shouldn’t try to twist words to fit your narrative. It makes you look more and more stupid ever character you type.
Did Hillary commit any crimes with the classified emails on her private server?
Did Obama weaponize the FBI, CIA, etc. to spy on his opponents/foes for political gain?
Quick comment...
You shouldn’t try to twist words to fit your narrative. It makes you look more and more stupid ever character you type.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 8:00 am to tigerinDC09
Have you thought about adding another antidepressant to your anxiety regimen? And then following with a shot of vodka?
Posted on 5/7/19 at 8:02 am to tigerinDC09
quote:Your old, desperately hopeful and delusional threads are a source of humor on this board.
tigerinDC09
Posted on 5/7/19 at 8:05 am to Jake88
quote:Yeah, him and the other resident retards always give us comic relief. It must truly suck to live their life.
Your old, desperately hopeful and delusional threads are a source of humor on this board.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 8:05 am to tigerinDC09
quote:The OP title was so uninformed regarding Barr, that I didn't even pursue the content related to the Wehelie charges.
don't charge an underlying crime
quote:That IS the "underlying crime".
Wehelie is charged with making false statements to the FBI
Posted on 5/7/19 at 8:06 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
That IS the "underlying crime".
But..but..but...Trump is ORANGE!
Posted on 5/7/19 at 8:09 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
tigerinDC09
Posted on 5/7/19 at 8:10 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
So Barr's own DoJ just destroy's Barr's view that you can't charge someone with Obstruction if you don't charge an underlying crime:
You realize none of this matters, considering there was....NO OBSTRUCTION, DUMBASS!!!
Posted on 5/7/19 at 8:16 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
Trump is named as an unindicted co-conspirator in a federal election crime. There's one underlying crime for you.
No he isn't
Posted on 5/7/19 at 8:26 am to tigerinDC09
quote:It’s over, bruh
Barr's own DoJ just destroy's Barr's view that you can't charge someone with Obstruction if you don't charge an underlying crime:
Posted on 5/7/19 at 8:29 am to TigerRanter
Since this thread has been debunked, let’s guess Tidc09’s occupation in DC.
I’m going with lobbyist or staffer for a dem
I’m going with lobbyist or staffer for a dem
Posted on 5/7/19 at 8:32 am to tigerinDC09
You got him this time?
Posted on 5/7/19 at 8:33 am to tigerinDC09
If the FBI came and asked you 50 questions about your last trip to Publix, do you think you could answer 100% truthfully and without "misleading" them?
Posted on 5/7/19 at 8:34 am to Gusoline
How many fail threads are you up too
You have to be pushing well over 200
Its incredible
You have to be pushing well over 200
Its incredible
Posted on 5/7/19 at 8:40 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
So how is ordering the top investigator into Flynn (who lied to the FBI), to "let it go", not Obstruction?
Because he is the President and it’s part of his constitutional duty to make such decisions ... even if you don’t like the man or his decisions.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 8:45 am to Gusoline
quote:
If the FBI came and asked you 50 questions about your last trip to Publix, do you think you could answer 100% truthfully and without "misleading" them?
Did you walk up the aisles or down the aisles?
Up.
WRONG. You walked up some and down others. Why do you lie to us? What did you bill come to?
$200.00.
WRONG. $199.98. Why do you insist on lying to us? What are you hiding?
TigerinDC: See, I told you they were dirty. Lying to the FBI is a crime. They wouldn't lie if they weren't hiding something.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 8:52 am to SSpaniel
Every thread this guy starts is a blatant lie.
The admins should anchor them as soon as the OP is debunked, which is usually page one or two.
Again, don't censor him, just prove him wrong and let the board move on.
The admins should anchor them as soon as the OP is debunked, which is usually page one or two.
Again, don't censor him, just prove him wrong and let the board move on.
Posted on 5/7/19 at 9:02 am to tigerinDC09
quote:
making false statements
Well, there it is
Page 5 of 7
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News