- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Canadian military simulated an invasion by US military
Posted on 1/20/26 at 3:28 pm to David_DJS
Posted on 1/20/26 at 3:28 pm to David_DJS
quote:
This is the overarching point. Trump's rhetoric about annexing China is just fun and games - until the Canucks cozy up to China.
They already have and they were going to merely because we elected Trump, so frick them. They can let the Chinese carry them.
0
Posted on 1/20/26 at 4:03 pm to David_DJS
quote:
David_DJS
Oh look it’s the guy who never shut up about how Kari Lake was just a bad candidate and didn’t have an election stolen from her
Posted on 1/20/26 at 4:22 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:The "rules-based international order" has been, "We demand it. The US pays for it."
Canadian Prime Minister Carney says the US-led "rules-based international order" is finished and "will not return."
Sorry, mate. This is where we step off and tell everyone to pay for their own studies on Equity in Scottish Distilling.
Posted on 1/20/26 at 4:28 pm to GnashRebel
quote:
That would be the easiest invasion all time
France would be easier.
Posted on 1/20/26 at 5:37 pm to hawgfaninc
My favorite is when people try to use the 1700s as a good example of why we couldn’t invade, take, and hold Canada 
As is travel, logistics, supply lines, etc hasn’t been solved in 250 years
As is travel, logistics, supply lines, etc hasn’t been solved in 250 years
Posted on 1/20/26 at 5:42 pm to hawgfaninc
Did they bomb the Baldwins?
Posted on 1/20/26 at 5:43 pm to hawgfaninc
Well.... it probably didn't take long to discover the outcome!
Posted on 1/20/26 at 5:59 pm to hawgfaninc
In other news, local high school team holds practice to play the Kansas City Chiefs in the event they’re ever scheduled
Posted on 1/20/26 at 6:04 pm to Sweep Da Leg
quote:
Oh look it’s the guy who never shut up about how Kari Lake was just a bad candidate and didn’t have an election stolen from her
And?
Posted on 1/20/26 at 6:24 pm to scrooster
I wonder what them and Chyna are discussing their security protections. Putting bases there. Imagine the deal if they announce putting a naval base somewhere between WA border and Alaska.
Posted on 1/20/26 at 6:49 pm to HagaDaga
That would mean war.
Posted on 1/20/26 at 7:01 pm to AUstar
Nah, invade them make most of Canada a Northern Territory and only allow state hood for Alberta
Posted on 1/20/26 at 7:04 pm to hawgfaninc
Meanwhile the Canadian Navy stands ready
Posted on 1/20/26 at 7:05 pm to scrooster
I genuinely appreciate your insight on these things
sorry hit send too fast. your opinion - is canada too large to ever really overtake? I could see owning vancouver or montreal, but no way, imo, does a other country, even us, take over all that land. canada is packed with redneck baws that aren't just going to roll over, regardless of what may comprise their military
sorry hit send too fast. your opinion - is canada too large to ever really overtake? I could see owning vancouver or montreal, but no way, imo, does a other country, even us, take over all that land. canada is packed with redneck baws that aren't just going to roll over, regardless of what may comprise their military
This post was edited on 1/20/26 at 7:10 pm
Posted on 1/20/26 at 7:06 pm to hawgfaninc
Posted on 1/20/26 at 7:13 pm to HagaDaga
quote:
I wonder what them and Chyna are discussing their security protections. Putting bases there. Imagine the deal if they announce putting a naval base somewhere between WA border and Alaska.
If China and Canada do any sort of joint military exercises or even joint readiness exercises that are perceived as compromising to the U.S.'s security ... even if they were to gam plan scenarios or share military hardware or technology ... that would be all the excuses Trump would need to slap them down.
Matter of fact, Canadians used to have troops on NORAD ... doing anything remotely perceived as counter to the North American Defense Strategy or anything that might be misconstrued as sharing secrets .... we would slap the taste outta Canada's mouth so fast and hard it would make their little cucked canuck heads spin.
It would be a monumental betrayal that would not, could not, be tolerated.
I seriously doubt NATO would let them make such an asinine decision on any level.
Posted on 1/20/26 at 7:14 pm to BigTigerJoe
quote:
Chinese reinforcements would be the real battle.
China doesn’t have heavy logistic capabilities, and haven’t been in combat since Korea.
Posted on 1/20/26 at 7:22 pm to Philzilla2k
quote:
China doesn’t have heavy logistic capabilities, and haven’t been in combat since Korea.
You are exactly right. Maybe the Chinese will dig a tunnel under the ocean from Beijing to Vancouver.
Posted on 1/20/26 at 7:25 pm to scrooster
That's good, but then again if the Democrats get back in after him then they'll take advantage of it. Like Chyna has since Obama
Posted on 1/20/26 at 7:28 pm to BigTigerJoe
quote:
Chinese reinforcements would be the real battle.
How would these troops get to Canada?
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News