- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/9/26 at 5:18 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
SCOTUS just said they have citizen rights as soon as they clear the vagina.
They didn't "just" say that. They upheld the existing interpretation.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 5:31 pm to BigPerm30
quote:
I think you should give them to at least 12 years old
I disagree. I think there should be a 5 year windw for termination, 13-17 years of age. When that smart mouth runs more than any parent can bear, termination application is accepted automatically.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 5:37 pm to Snipe
quote:
California is controlled by Satan.
I have about 40 churches within a couple miles of me. None of which are the church of satan.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 5:50 pm to Ailsa
Meanwhile my sister in law and her husband just adopted a baby after waiting 18 months and costing them over $55k for the adoption process. This is ridiculous and sick.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 6:06 pm to Ailsa
Democrats are the loyal servants of Satan.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 6:19 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:
The fact you read this to mean "its now legal to kill a 27 day old in California" is....not surprising actually
That's exactly what it says. If that's not the intent, they need to go back to the drawing board.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 6:28 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
That's exactly what it says. If that's not the intent, they need to go back to the drawing board.
So your interpretation of this law, as its written, is that it is perfectly legal for a mother to just throw their 27 day old off of a bridge?
I'm in awe of the stupidity of this board.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 6:32 pm to onmymedicalgrind
Don’t want to sound mean but one has to be impossibly stupid to believe the OP’s assertion
Posted on 7/9/26 at 6:33 pm to onmymedicalgrind
quote:No, but it seems designed to limit the prosecution of Kermit Gosnell snipping types.
it is perfectly legal for a mother to just throw their 27 day old off of a bridge?
Posted on 7/9/26 at 7:29 pm to Jake88
quote:
You aren't terribly bright, are you?
It was a joke. Ever heard of "hyperbole?"
You don't want to compare IQs, I promise you.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 7:38 pm to Eurocat
quote:
Yeah, I'm ok with it
Of course you are. Youre one of the biggest retards on this board.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 7:40 pm to Tom288
quote:Did you skim the thread. Posters believe the OP.
It was a joke. Ever heard of "hyperbole?"
quote:Oh, ok. This is an intelligent comeback. Instead of Sonic, should we meet in the stacks in Vanderbilt's Central Library?
It was a joke. Ever heard of "hyperbole?"
Posted on 7/9/26 at 7:46 pm to Ailsa
I was reading about this CA bill. They removed kill a baby up to 28 after birth from the bill so bill can pass. Just put that in a bill is completely NAZI Germany shite.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 7:59 pm to Jake88
quote:
Did you skim the thread. Posters believe the OP.
No, that's why I didn't spend time on a serious post.
quote:
Oh, ok. This is an intelligent comeback. Instead of Sonic, should we meet in the stacks in Vanderbilt's Central Library?
It's as intelligent as "you're not too bright, are ya." I decided to meet you at your level.
Posted on 7/9/26 at 8:37 pm to Tom288
quote:Sure you did.
I decided to meet you at your level
Posted on 7/9/26 at 9:44 pm to 6R12
The amount of times "clear the vagina" has been used in this thread like it's the crossbar in a baby pole vault
Popular
Back to top


1











