Started By
Message

re: Bush’s failure to partially privatize social security was a massive fumble

Posted on 8/18/26 at 12:24 pm to
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
118088 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

That was during the Romney/Ryan campaign, not the Bush SS reform push.

In both cases the Dem votes killed it. Not the GOP.
Posted by DesScorp
Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
10718 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 12:31 pm to
SS is an untouchable 3rd rail until the Boomers die off. When that happens, they'll almost certainly cut benefits because of the pathetic birth rates.
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
92436 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

Nope, Democrats rejected it.


Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
12570 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 12:42 pm to
What is this?

Has everything that can possibly be whined about regarding Trump today been edxhausted?
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
118088 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

SS is an untouchable 3rd rail until the Boomers die off. When that happens, they'll almost certainly cut benefits because of the pathetic birth rates.

The arguments will be the same. "How can you cut my benefits after you've stolen my money for 50 years." The only solution is the gradually increasing option to reduce your pay withheld in return for less benefits, leaving it up to you to use your extra money to plan your retirement investments. As time goes the gradual option will become 100% and SS will be gone. But that's gonna take a long time without the left promising everyone more money and scrapping the reform.
Posted by SparkyWilson
Member since May 2026
283 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 1:15 pm to
quote:

The arguments will be the same. "How can you cut my benefits after you've stolen my money for 50 years."


This. Nobody wants to be left holding the bag. Let the next crop of beneficiaries bite the bullet but not me.

quote:

The only solution is the gradually increasing option to reduce your pay withheld in return for less benefits, leaving it up to you to use your extra money to plan your retirement investments. As time goes the gradual option will become 100% and SS will be gone. But that's gonna take a long time without the left promising everyone more money and scrapping the reform.


Not a bad idea and better than means testing, in my opinion.
Posted by CharlesUFarley
Daphne, AL
Member since Jan 2022
1182 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

In both cases the Dem votes killed it. Not the GOP.


I think The GOPe resisted both efforts: Bush's reforms plus Ryan's push to cut benefits.

The GOPe even resisted Bush's medicare advantage plans, with one senator giving his support in exchange for not enacting it in his state until he retired.

Barack Obama nad both houses for two years and changed healthcare forever plus contaminated the entire beurocracy. The GOP held it for four years under Bush and now four years under Trump and can't get sh!te done.
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
18160 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

He was absolutely crucified for it.


The dems can't put punishing corporate tax rates in effect if the return to SS depends partially on performance of equities. Therefore it would be lockstep vote against that and continuous fear mongering propaganda that will scare the smooth brains. Even though they are shoveling their own money into 401K funds.
Posted by RFK
Mar-a-Lago
Member since May 2012
3392 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 2:57 pm to
Is this the same GWB who let the big banks manipulate mortgage bonds to the point it causes the greatest financial disaster since the Great Depression?

Yea what a shame he didn’t get to put out treasury’s money into the unpredictable stock market.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
46010 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 3:04 pm to
quote:

POTUS Trump or TS Bessent, with their business acumen, could certainly push for a program that enhances SS return going forward that is probably stronger than what Bush suggested.

Why don't they?


RINOs in the Senate would block it.
Posted by leeman101
Huntsville, AL
Member since Aug 2020
2762 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 3:16 pm to
quote:

So what did GWB II, the RINOs, and the Mafia Democrats do? . They came up with TARP (Troubled Asset Relief Program) scheme. The program allocated billions of dollars to bail out the troubled banks and lending institutions. And just like that Bill Clinton's fiasco was wiped out.


Seems when Obama took office the banks were on the ropes and would have agreed to any reform. Instead Obama focused on Obamcare insurance giving the banks time to recover and hire lobbyist. If only Obama waited a year for Obamacare and went after the banks first. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Posted by m2pro
Member since Nov 2008
30093 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 3:39 pm to
It's almost like the ones that get to be figureheads to the powers that be behind them don't have control themselves and are just there to play the part they are given.
Posted by Lou
Modesto, CA
Member since Aug 2005
9012 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 3:48 pm to
quote:

Bush’s failure to partially privatize social security was a massive fumble

"Partially privatizing social security is like playing stock market roulette, it's a risky scheme."

-- Al Gore
Posted by KiwiHead
Auckland, NZ
Member since Jul 2014
38589 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 4:58 pm to
More like 2005 and Republicans along with Democrats ran as fast as they could from it.
Posted by Columbia
Land of the Yuppies
Member since Mar 2016
3259 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 5:05 pm to
I went to a function in Little Rock where he was promoting it. Only time I ever went to a political event, but my friend got me in. Pretty cool to see POTUS in person.
Posted by jrodLSUke
Premium
Member since Jan 2011
26550 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

He was absolutely crucified for it.

And now, the revisionist history crowd wants to blame Bush for not privatizing SS all by himself.

In the real world, it was Democrats and Corporate Media that launched an all out propaganda war claiming that Bush was taking SS away from seniors.

What can we do? People are stupid.
Posted by jp4lsu
Member since Sep 2016
7258 posts
Posted on 8/18/26 at 5:38 pm to
It will never be fixed. We were doomed as soon as it was allowed to be spent as part of the general fund.

If that wasn't bad enough we were then saddled (thru much arm twisting) Obamacare, which is going to be pushed to further to create universal Medicare for everyone. The DSA is going to begin this push in the DNC.

We are basically in socialism now, just not quite full blown.
Posted by GeorgePaton
God's Country
Member since May 2017
5987 posts
Posted on 8/19/26 at 7:58 am to
I recall at the time the TARP fiasco was being played out thinking - it appears our black community friends are afflicted with a permenant case of "paying on mortgage loans is raciss" syndrone.

And I watched in frustration in the wanning moments of the Bush II term as the UniParty fell all over themselves in an attempt to fix the problem our pal Bill Clinton created. IMO that's why we've seen this lovefest between the Bush clan and Bill and Hildabeest played out ever since that TARP debacle.

Don't get me started on Obama and his Affordable Heathcare Act. There is nothing affordable about that fiasco. It was legislation funded by a massive dip into Medicare (hint: I recall at the time the mafia democrats told us the estimated startup cost for obamacare was $ 494 billion - a downpayment maybe). And our seniors have suffered for it.

Yep, the most vulnerable in our society (babies in wombs and seniors) do NOT fare well in a mafia democrat run government.

The next target for the mafia democrats - those 401k's and Social Security.


This post was edited on 8/19/26 at 8:14 am
Posted by Demonbengal
Ruston
Member since May 2015
5786 posts
Posted on 8/19/26 at 8:15 am to
quote:

And now, the revisionist history crowd wants to blame Bush for not privatizing SS all by himself. In the real world, it was Democrats and Corporate Media that launched an all out propaganda war claiming that Bush was taking SS away from seniors. What can we do? People are stupid.


This was the reality. The corporate media still had significant influence in the early 2000’s and scared old people. Members of his own party started to waffle and that was it. I have a lot of issues with W Bush, but this was not really on him.
Posted by Fat Bastard
alter hunter
Member since Mar 2009
92436 posts
Posted on 8/19/26 at 8:32 am to
quote:

ea what a shame he didn’t get to put out treasury’s money into the unpredictable stock market.


yeah our gains woulda been so much better with SS huh?

good lord you are dumb as.........
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram