Started By
Message

re: Bullet used to kill charlie kirk cant be matched to Tyler Robinson gun.

Posted on 3/31/26 at 5:17 am to
Posted by DMAN1968
Member since Apr 2019
13242 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 5:17 am to
quote:

That there were 12 cell phones at the scene that day, that were registered to Israelis. Soon as they started looking into it, FBI shut em down.

Oh boy. You might need to provide a link as to this.

Also, post one as to why a country with probably the best intelligence agencies in the world would allow such a thing to be discovered.
Posted by ulmtiger
Member since Jan 2008
2499 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 6:23 am to
I guess the part where the defendant called his dad and confessed to killing Charli Kirk is less important to you than what the killer/ defendant’s attorneys are feeding all of you that went down the rabbit hole.
Posted by Earnest_P
Member since Aug 2021
5488 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 6:26 am to
quote:

If the bullet in Kirk's neck didn't come from the gun Robinson was holding, then the rifle is just a decoy "prop" to sell a specific narrative.


Are you trying to tell me some of “our” own spies would FAKE evidence to sell a story? No, I just can’t believe it.
Posted by Huey Lewis
BR
Member since Oct 2013
5112 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 6:26 am to
quote:

Hunting bullet doing what a hunting bullet is designed to do, not what a FMJ will do


In this case it's probably the opposite.

Regular store bought FMJ 5.56 for an AR-15 typically conforms to 55gr M193 military FMJ standard.

55gr FMJ 5.56 ammo will aggressively fragment at something around or over 2700 fps as I recall, which standard 16.5" barrel AR-15's will have out to somewhere around 200 yards.

Conversely, actual hunting ammo for 5.56 tends to be soft point 65gr or heavier rounds and they as specifically designed to NOT fragment and instead flatten out wide with a straight and predictable internal trajectory upon impacting the body.
Posted by Folsom
Folsom
Member since Mar 2006
3633 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 6:28 am to
What gun?
Posted by Fuzzy Dunlop
Member since Mar 2025
490 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 6:31 am to
100 Poli board thread starters vs. reading comprehension

quote:

The defense also says there are multiple categories of forensic evidence that are still incomplete, according to their discovery request -- and until they get the full case files and testing protocols and have their own experts review them, they won’t be able to determine whether that evidence is actually reliable if it ends up in court.
Posted by Barneyrb
NELA
Member since May 2016
7230 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 6:56 am to
quote:

Regular store bought FMJ 5.56 for an AR-15 typically conforms to 55gr M193 military FMJ standard.


And CK was shot with a 30-06 which has nothing to do with a .223/5.56. Your point is invalid
Posted by LSU alum wannabe
Katy, TX
Member since Jan 2004
27792 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:00 am to
quote:

Hunting bullet doing what a hunting bullet is designed to do, not what a FMJ will do


If the gun was a plant, you aren’t planting a 30-06. Dad’s deer rifle isn’t as agitating as a big old mean AR. All black too.
Posted by Tiger in NY
Neptune Beach, FL
Member since Sep 2003
31586 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:03 am to
quote:

What were the "foreign connections" that Joe Kent wanted to investigate but wasnt allowed to?


Well, Charlie had become a vocal opponent of any war against Iran so you connect the dots
Posted by dickkellog
little rock
Member since Dec 2024
2931 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:05 am to
his defense team claims, there i fixed it for you
Posted by Roll Tide Ravens
Birmingham, AL
Member since Nov 2015
51716 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:06 am to
Should be noted that this is a claim by Robinson’s defense team.
quote:

According to the legal docs obtained by TMZ, Robinson's defense team argues there’s a discrepancy between the ballistic evidence and the weapon prosecutors say is connected to Robinson
This post was edited on 3/31/26 at 7:09 am
Posted by EnragedPlatypus
Member since Nov 2025
39 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:08 am to
quote:

In this case it's probably the opposite.

Regular store bought FMJ 5.56 for an AR-15 typically conforms to 55gr M193 military FMJ standard.

55gr FMJ 5.56 ammo will aggressively fragment at something around or over 2700 fps as I recall, which standard 16.5" barrel AR-15's will have out to somewhere around 200 yards.

Conversely, actual hunting ammo for 5.56 tends to be soft point 65gr or heavier rounds and they as specifically designed to NOT fragment and instead flatten out wide with a straight and predictable internal trajectory upon impacting the body.


Are you retarded? Like another poster said, Kirk was killed with 30-06. Nowhere, other than you, was 5.56 brought up.
Posted by ipodking
#StopTalkingAboutWomensSports
Member since Jun 2008
58957 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:12 am to
MAGA still hasn’t recovered from the killing of Charlie

There is no more youth movement in the Conservative Party

Liberals struck a bigger blow than initially thought

There will never be another Charlie
Posted by jp4lsu
Member since Sep 2016
6778 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:20 am to
quote:

I guess the part where the defendant called his dad and confessed to killing Charli Kirk


Did he actually? I don't think he admitted to his dad. His dad and uncle sheriff convinced him to turn himself in after seeing the images. I don't think he admitted to his dad. I might be wrong, but I think that was an assumption.

Now the texting between him and his furry friend, he alluded to doing it.
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
8445 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:23 am to
I don't give much credence to rense but saw a video posted of a man who was part of Kirk's security team possibly using a palm gun. There are a list of vids at this link and the man in the brown shirt is the one who supposedly used it.



https://rense.com/general98/charlie_kirk_stories.php
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
182455 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:26 am to
quote:

Sounds like an open-and-shut, slam-dunk case.


And what you listed is only the evidence we know about. Imagine what else we won't see until the trial.

This media blitz about the bullet is an attempt to taint the jury pool by the defense. The trial will clear up the nuances you mentioned about bullet matching, but by then, you already have window lickers like Sir Winston, who have bought into the TMZ story and have dug in.
Posted by imjustafatkid
Alabama
Member since Dec 2011
65858 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:26 am to
quote:

There is no more youth movement in the Conservative Party


Completely false.
Posted by monster2024
Member since Mar 2024
124 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:28 am to
WHAT??????????????
Posted by stout
Porte du Lafitte
Member since Sep 2006
182455 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:28 am to
quote:

There are a list of vids at this link and the man in the brown shirt is the one who supposedly used it.




Retard
Posted by jp4lsu
Member since Sep 2016
6778 posts
Posted on 3/31/26 at 7:30 am to
quote:

Are you retarded? Like another poster said, Kirk was killed with 30-06. Nowhere, other than you, was 5.56 brought up.

No he isn't retarded. He is discussing the behavior of soft point rounds.
That holds true for any round.

The issue I have is that there was no exit wound from a 30-06 going through 6" of some of the softest tissue on a human. The claim is it hit the spine of "steel" and fragmented. Fragmentation can happen, but it doesn't then spread out 180 deg instantly after hitting bone. Physics doesn't work like that.

The fragmentation would've had to happen on impact for it to scatter fragments along the spine. The round would not have fragmented on impact with the soft tissue of the neck. But as best as I can tell, we don't have an autopsy but just an examiner noting the fragmentation.

30-06 will blow thru a neck whether it hits a spine or bone. The only way I will buy that, is if they get every fragment and weigh it and see if it weighs close to the 30-06 soft point bullet. This has been the catalyst of me being skeptical of the official narrative.
This post was edited on 3/31/26 at 7:50 am
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram