Started By
Message

re: Bovino just told reporters the suspect was on scene several minutes interfering...

Posted on 1/25/26 at 4:55 pm to
Posted by I20goon
about 7mi down a dirt road
Member since Aug 2013
19829 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

What was the woman doing to interfere? I haven’t seen anything one way or the other.
placed herself directly in the path of an officer, twice.

The second time she followed him across the street to do it. That's when she gets the "Chad shove" putting her arse on the ground like Rudy Ruettiger going against Willie Roaf.

And if you follow SFP's attempt at logic the ICE officer had no reason to cross the street, therefore he was not in performance of his duties and the whole interaction is illegal.

To that I say there is no Red Rover law that says Feds can't cross a street without a warrant or specifically to effect an arrest.
This post was edited on 1/25/26 at 4:57 pm
Posted by Posstradamus
Member since Jan 2026
62 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 4:56 pm to
You calling these peaceful protestors rioters tells me all I need to know about your ability to process information.
Posted by Smokeyone
Maryville Tn
Member since Jul 2016
21137 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

Yeah you crazies on the poles are making life bad for the people who aren't suffering from partisan brain rot


I loled. I bet you consider yourself a libertarian. Reality isn’t subjective.
Posted by rocksteady
Member since Sep 2013
2979 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 4:59 pm to
quote:

Broke no laws that I, a cum guzzling retard, recognize


We know bro, we know. Hope you enjoyed your "first foray" into this board ;)
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91838 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

placed herself directly in the path of an officer, twice.


No rush but if you have some video or something I’d like to see it. Haven’t seen that yet. Thanks.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
23219 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

wut


Going full on retard today I see.i know you don’t read others’ entire post before hitting reply but you don’t even read your own. Quit wasting people’s time dude.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90763 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:00 pm to
frick alters all over.
Posted by Dirk Dawgler
Georgia
Member since Nov 2011
4304 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:00 pm to
Nobody has the right to obstruct and impede law enforcement in the act of enforcing the laws.

The guy who earned the dirt nap, and you and other pussy arse lunatics, can stand on the sidewalk well away from where they are doing their job. You can scream like little bitches, hold gay arse signs, blow fairy whistles, chant in unison , beat on drums, and otherwise act like the lunatics that you are. Had dirt nap boy had done that, he would be alive.

He did none of that though. Instead, he got in their way, impeded, obstructed, and interfered to the best of his little bitch made ability. He broke the rules of being a peaceful protester and chose to be a law breaking agitator. Wish you would have joined him!
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
42430 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:01 pm to
quote:

Holy shite


Just following your lead if a right wing guy was killed in this situation.
Posted by berrycajun
Baton Rouge
Member since May 2016
7223 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:02 pm to
Interfering in federal operations is not peacefully protesting. In Baton Rouge the lefties stand on a busy corner with their signs in protest. They are peaceful protesters. They are not actively obstructing justice. It is illegal to get in the way of arrests - get in front of ice vehicles leaving to make arrests

Posted by BCreed1
Alabama
Member since Jan 2024
6994 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

I honestly don’t understand what you’re trying to say here.



First of all Slack, as I have told you before, while we disagree on some things I think you are a honest broker.

Let me try this worded differently.

When a hostile and dangerous environment is created, a different set of rules are put into play and is allowed by the court.

Due to that, excessive-force claims must be judged based on the totality of the circumstances, including events leading up to the use of force, not only the split-second moment when force was used.

The window is no longer considered to be 2 to 3 seconds or in the moment. That was a 9-0 ruling by SCOTUS.

That should answer this:

quote:

I don’t see what dumbass Walz has to do with the actual facts of the case.



His words and all the actions listed in the OP are now actual facts of the case. Due to attacks on ICE during and after the list in the OP, the lives of the agents were at risk.

When this guy showed up and a gun was discovered, they immediately are now operating as he is there with intent to kill. Anything he does at that point that could be seen as him reaching for anything that could be a weapon, that man is dead.

That agent will not be put in jail. They can try to sue for wrongful death, but he had a friggin gun in a riot zone.

For me. I'm pissed. I'm pissed. This should have never happened and the ones that promoted these actions in leadership are the ones that SHOULD be held accountable.

Did that make it clearer?
Posted by Posstradamus
Member since Jan 2026
62 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:03 pm to
Never touched an officer, never walked up to one. Don't even see him address an officer. His presence was not illegal.
Posted by BCreed1
Alabama
Member since Jan 2024
6994 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

No. I'm here.


No, you are running from answering the question and I am loving that you are being exposed.

Name the time frame put in place by the SCOTUS.
Posted by Posstradamus
Member since Jan 2026
62 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:05 pm to
I'll be honest, I don't expect you bootlickers to look at this fairly. How can you while you have the boot all the way down your throat? Pretty feminine behavior.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

the "Chad shove"

oh wow

quote:

And if you follow SFP's attempt at logic the ICE officer had no reason to cross the street, therefore he was not in performance of his duties and the whole interaction is illegal.

To that I say there is no Red Rover law that says Feds can't cross a street without a warrant or specifically to effect an arrest.

At the very least you have to concede these actions had nothing to do with illegal immigrants, at that point.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
42430 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

And They don’t know that he was.

They warn the public and others about making speculations before all of the information is out. However, in the same breath, they do exactly what they tell others not to do.

I also don’t know for sure that he wasn’t a plant by Santa Claus


Jeez. They don't have to know.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

Going full on retard today


wut

quote:

I see.i know you don’t read others’ entire post before hitting reply but you don’t even read your own. Quit wasting people’s time dude.

Bro why are you melting in the most random, flailing way?

I wasn't even meant to you and posted to you with respect, and you're just going full China Syndrome with random/weird ad homs
Posted by deathvalleytiger10
Member since Sep 2009
9283 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

Never touched an officer, never walked up to one. Don't even see him address an officer.


Wow.
Posted by OceanMan
Member since Mar 2010
23219 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

There is nothing disingenuous about that reply. Standing in the road blocking traffic changes nothing material about the events that lead up to him being shot.


You entered the thread with an opinion on what he deserved, then 10 pages later make a comment as if others are missing the nuance of an all or nothing blame game. Explain how that is not disingenuous.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:08 pm to
quote:

No, you are running from answering the question and I am loving that you are being exposed.

Name the time frame put in place by the SCOTUS.


It's based on the incident. As I already said, likely from the shove, or, at most, when the LEO started crossing the street.
Jump to page
Page First 12 13 14 15 16 ... 26
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 14 of 26Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram