- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Bovino just told reporters the suspect was on scene several minutes interfering...
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:09 pm to deathvalleytiger10
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:09 pm to deathvalleytiger10
quote:
Wow
Care to tell my exactly why you disagree? Don't want to actually engage? Beta cuck?
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:09 pm to OceanMan
quote:
You entered the thread with an opinion on what he deserved, then 10 pages later make a comment as if others are missing the nuance of an all or nothing blame game. Explain how that is not disingenuous.
Dude you're going full on MAGAtard. Take a step back, take a breath, and reset.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:09 pm to BCreed1
And to be clear on my end, I get what you’re trying to say but I don’t think it matters in this particularly case. He was shot because an officer disarmed him and hollered gun. That was the final straw in all of the events. I don’t think him standing in the street in their way or Tim Walz ultimately end up being material in any way.
Now if some guy was rushing up to officers with his hands in his pockets and then pulled them out as he neared them in a manner similar to drawing a weapon, all of the stuff you said would be very material as to why he was shot.
Now if some guy was rushing up to officers with his hands in his pockets and then pulled them out as he neared them in a manner similar to drawing a weapon, all of the stuff you said would be very material as to why he was shot.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:10 pm to Posstradamus
quote:
Never touched an officer, never walked up to one. Don't even see him address an officer. His presence was not illegal.
Go back and read my OP.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
SlowindependentPro dropping Magatard.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:12 pm to Posstradamus
quote:
Never touched an officer, never walked up to one. Don't even see him address an officer. His presence was not illegal.
His interference was illegal.
Resisting detainment was illegal.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:12 pm to slackster
quote:to be clear, I'm talking about grey hoodie, the female offender Pretti ran from the middle of the street to help/protect.
No rush but if you have some video or something I’d like to see it. Haven’t seen that yet. Thanks.
Not Pretti himself.
Except when the video taker conveniently drops the camera as she runs across the street you see her and another person blocking Chad, the officer who shoved her, on the other side of the street then of course she reappears right in front of him just before getting the Chad Shove in the most common video out there.
To me, opinion, the agitators were definitely trying to prevent ICE from doing something on that side of the street or reach that white SUV.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:12 pm to slackster
quote:
And to be clear on my end, I get what you’re trying to say but I don’t think it matters in this particularly case. He was shot because an officer disarmed him and hollered gun. That was the final straw in all of the events. I don’t think him standing in the street in their way or Tim Walz ultimately end up being material in any way.
You're correct. It's just inconvenient to their narrative and talking points.
quote:
Now if some guy was rushing up to officers with his hands in his pockets and then pulled them out as he neared them in a manner similar to drawing a weapon, all of the stuff you said would be very material as to why he was shot.
Also correct
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:12 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
These ACKTUALLY attempts to weakly spin will not sit well with the voting populace.
That's where you're wrong. The voting populace is tired, very tired of the "drama kid" entire scene. You're not special, I'm not special, and no one gives a shite what either of us think. That's ok mind your own business and sink or swim like everyone else. Real, honest, and true elections will be the downfall of this entire "I'm special" mentality or the lack there of will be the death of a once great nation.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
It's based on the incident.
Show the SCOTUS saying it's only minutes. We all know why you are not and can't.
The defense of the DOJ will be that WALZ and the leaders of that state created an unsafe and dangerous environment.
That is where this will begin.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:14 pm to djsdawg
He never resisted but I don't expect a boot deepthroater to admit that so you're good.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:15 pm to OceanMan
quote:
You entered the thread with an opinion on what he deserved, then 10 pages later make a comment as if others are missing the nuance of an all or nothing blame game. Explain how that is not disingenuous.
They’re not mutually exclusive.
This is not my first time on the political talk. I knew full well the statement in the OP would be used as if it clears any culpability of the agents from any point onward. If you read this thread you’ll see it was quite accurate.
The statement in the OP ruins the MSM narrative that he was just minding his own business but it’s not material to why he was shot one way or the other.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:15 pm to Posstradamus
Look at pussy alter work.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:16 pm to Posstradamus
quote:
Care to tell my exactly why you disagree? Don't want to actually engage? Beta cuck?
You got the Pretti enthusiasm I like to see in my suicidal retards. Get out there and show ICE you mean business big boy ;)
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:16 pm to Jbird
Are you a parrot with one line?
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:17 pm to rocksteady
Another one who can't actually engage with the discussion ;). Let the grownups talk.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:17 pm to Jbird
I can't imagine having to make a second fake name for a message board to show act in a way that my first fake name would be embarrassed by... then calls people cucks lololol
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:19 pm to sabanisarustedspoke
quote:
That's where you're wrong. The voting populace is tired, very tired of the "drama kid" entire scene.
The polling data disagrees. Bigly.
Posted on 1/25/26 at 5:19 pm to BCreed1
quote:
Show the SCOTUS saying it's only minutes.
I didn't say that.
I said it's based on the incident
Popular
Back to top


2






