re: Blm leader calls white people "genetic mistakes. Sub-humans"

quote:

---

Those in a benign environment tend to "coast," regardless of whether we are discussing individuals or civilizations.

---

If they were all “coasting” then natural selection may not have given much weight to selecting for intelligence.

quote:

---

"Whatever happens, we have got the Maxim gun, and they have not."

---

except that in that time it was the Martini-Henry rifle.

quote:

---

White America won't roll over like Rhodesia

---

Rhodesia was strangled economically, in part by white America. Same with South Africa.

Damn racist history books. They've lied to us down thru history and depicted practically every one of the geniuses who advanced Science, Math, medicine, technology, etc. as being a member of this sub-human race.

I mean, they've lied about almost all of them. Guttenberg, Benjamin Franklin, Madam Currie, Thomas Edison, Henry Ford, the Wright Brothers, Jonas Salk, etc. Not to mention the inventors of television, computers, the internet, and my personal favorite, the slinky.

All lies! As a member of this sub-human race that really isn't fit to breathe and take up space on the black man's planet, I DEMAND that the names and faces of the black people who are actually responsible for all of these advancements in humankind be made known to the public IMMEDIATELY!!!

You think the black overlords will let me live if they read this?

I think it’s hilarious that someone actually thinks that

quote:

---

What color were the people of the civilizations that first developed agriculture? Indus River? Egypt? Etcetera.

---

Well, this is a good point. Assuming the "out of Africa" theory is actually solid - and I mean the "pure" form of that theory, not the "back into Africa" corollaries and all that, then the differences are all the more stark.

If there has been relatively continuous human existence in Sub-Saharan Africa, it is a reasonable hypothesis that the "best" left early and went to North Africa, Asia and Europe. I'm not discounting the challenges of the Southern portion of the Continent might have posed those early humans, but with all other things being equal, those first 50k years of human advancement tended to flow with the emigrants and not those remaining in the earliest human settlements.

The other aspect this bizarre racial theory tends to dismiss is hybrid vigor. We have fewer and fewer questions that those humans who left Africa (particularly early departures) commingled and reverse assimilated cousins of homo sapiens (particularly Neanderthals and Denisovans), something for which we have little evidence of in Sub-Saharan Africa.

We know from nature and husbandry that successful hybridization often produces offspring superior to either parent. Most of this is speculation, of course, but the more we know about the genome, the more we realize such hybridization must have occurred in Europe and Asia.

If this person is taking an evolutionary approach to humanity, they have abandoned a basis for objective moral reasoning.

If we are merely the byproduct of millions of years of natural, evolutionary processes, then what and who we are is of no consequence in the grand scheme of things. Humans--no matter what race, nationality, or sex--have no intrinsic human value in that paradigm. We also have no basis for objective morality, meaning each individual moral perspective is just as valid as the next. Their particular perspective about the lack of value or worth of "whiteness" is therefore arbitrary and can be countered by just saying "I have a different opinion from you".

What they need is to acknowledge the God who created them and His perfect moral law. They need to acknowledge that all people, white and black, are made in His image and that we are commanded to treat all people with love as we are accountable to God.

Their position of white inferiority is not grounded in rationality or truth.

quote:

---

The most-advanced civilizations have largely been those there were NOT based in a benign environment and were thus FORCED to innovate. Homo sapiens EVOLVED in Africa, and Africa was thus the most "benign" environment imaginable for the species. The species HAD to innovate elsewhere, due to the less-benign environments.

---

I know you didn't mean to, but, you do realize that this point could easily be re-written to fit in perfectly with any racially tinged writing the last 2 centuries, right?

Not that I'm saying you're wrong mind you. You aren't. But, let's just say that what you typed is the kind of thing that could get you "cancelled" in a non-anonymous situation.

quote:

---

black ppl simply through their dominant genes can literally wipe out the white race if we had the power to.

---

White ppl through their dominant firepower can literally wipe out the black race if we had the power to.

This works both ways, chickie!