- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Biden admin barred from firing unvaccinated employees after DC judge issues injunction
Posted on 10/29/21 at 9:17 am
Posted on 10/29/21 at 9:17 am
LINK
quote:
A Washington, D.C., district court judge issued a temporary restraining order Thursday that prevents both civilian and active-duty military plaintiffs from being terminated after they sued the Biden administration over religious exemptions to COVID-19 vaccines.
"None of the civilian employee plaintiffs will be subject to discipline while his or her request for a religious exception is pending," District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly ordered, according to a Minute Order obtained by Fox News.
quote:
The judge also ruled that "active duty military plaintiffs, whose religious exception requests have been denied, will not be disciplined or separated during the pendency of their appeals."
quote:
The court further ordered the defendants in the Biden administration to file a supplemental notice by noon on Friday that indicates whether they will agree that no plaintiff will be disciplined or terminated pending the court's ruling.
quote:
Twenty plaintiffs sued President Biden and members of his administration in their official capacity over the president's Sept. 9 executive order mandating vaccines for federal employees, according to civil action filed Sunday.
quote:
"The Biden administration has shown an unprecedented, cavalier attitude toward the rule of law and an utter ineptitude at basic constitutional contours," said the plaintiffs' attorney Michael Yoder in a statement to Fox News.
6
Posted on 10/29/21 at 9:19 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Considering that branches like the Navy were denying exemptions en masse without bothering to follow any procedure, this could get interesting.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 9:21 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
frick the religious exception ... no one should be forced to put anything in their body for any reason by anyone that they do not wish to. There is no need for an exception.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 9:22 am to saints5021
quote:
frick the religious exception ... no one should be forced to put anything in their body for any reason by anyone that they do not wish to. There is no need for an exception.
This
Posted on 10/29/21 at 9:24 am to saints5021
quote:
frick the religious exception ... no one should be forced to put anything in their body for any reason by anyone that they do not wish to. There is no need for an exception
You’re not wrong but when religious exemptions are now being denied as a condition of remaining MRNA free it should scare the shite out of every freedom loving American.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 9:26 am to teke184
quote:
Considering that branches like the Navy were denying exemptions en masse without bothering to follow any procedure, this could get interesting.
Surprisingly DHS has accepted religious exemptions en masse. I was shocked.
And this is from a super higher up in DHS
Posted on 10/29/21 at 9:27 am to saints5021
quote:
frick the religious exception ... no one should be forced to put anything in their body for any reason by anyone that they do not wish to. There is no need for an exception.
Just because they think they need to delve into and attempt to analyze the sincerity of your religious beliefs, doesn't mean the government is not willing to protect your freedom!
Posted on 10/29/21 at 9:28 am to Y.A. Tittle
There is no freedom when the government can force me to take a vaccine. The government ain't protecting shite.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 9:30 am to saints5021
quote:I agree with you in principle but religious objections should be considered due to the explicit protection provided for religious faith in the Constitution. If it's OK for the government to violate explicit rights, they will have no problem violating implicit ones.
frick the religious exception ... no one should be forced to put anything in their body for any reason by anyone that they do not wish to. There is no need for an exception.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 9:31 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
(no message)
This post was edited on 10/29/21 at 9:32 am
Posted on 10/29/21 at 9:32 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
The court further ordered the defendants in the Biden administration to file a supplemental notice by noon on Friday that indicates whether they will agree that no plaintiff will be disciplined or terminated pending the court's ruling
What does this mean? "whether they will agree". So, they have a right to just ignore the injunction?
Posted on 10/29/21 at 9:34 am to saints5021
quote:
frick the religious exception ... no one should be forced to put anything in their body for any reason by anyone that they do not wish to. There is no need for an exception.
Say it with me
Philosophical Exemption
Posted on 10/29/21 at 9:44 am to lsursb
quote:
What does this mean? "whether they will agree". So, they have a right to just ignore the injunction?
You confuse 'the right' to ignore with 'the will' to ignore... They've already admitted the latter being the default position for most things Libs disagree with.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 9:45 am to saints5021
quote:
frick the religious exception ... no one should be forced to put anything in their body for any reason by anyone that they do not wish to. There is no need for an exception.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 9:56 am to Bass Tiger
quote:
living in america today should scare the shite out of every freedom loving American.
FIFY
Posted on 10/29/21 at 9:58 am to saints5021
quote:
frick the religious exception ... no one should be forced to put anything in their body for any reason by anyone that they do not wish to. There is no need for an exception.
True but anyone can file these as an excuse. How can they prove if you’re religious or not
Posted on 10/29/21 at 10:09 am to saints5021
I had a call with HR yesterday after I filled out my vaccine survey stating I am not vaccinated and will not do so and also did not choose any of the exemptions. She wanted to verify my response was correct. I told her yes and I didn't want to jump through any BS hoops they may have to prove I may qualify for an exemption. She acted surprised.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 10:28 am to lsursb
quote:
What does this mean? "whether they will agree". So, they have a right to just ignore the injunction?
It may be asking if they will follow the injunction, or appeal it.
Posted on 10/29/21 at 10:29 am to Major Dutch Schaefer
Temporary Win
Posted on 10/29/21 at 10:49 am to saints5021
quote:
There is no freedom when the government can force me to take a vaccine
Agree! The government has no business telling any of us what we should be doing with our own bodies.
Just like the seatbelt law, why does the government have the right to tell me what to do in a car a buy, that I maintain, I pay taxes for, and asking me to do something that doesn't hurt other people?
We slowly but surely giving away up our freedom, bit by bit, all in the same of security.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News