- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
SouthEndzoneTiger
| Favorite team: | LSU  |
| Location: | Louisiana |
| Biography: | |
| Interests: | LSU Sports |
| Occupation: | |
| Number of Posts: | 11444 |
| Registered on: | 3/5/2008 |
| Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Do you think Chicken cuts some of us longtime posters slack from being banned?
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger on 12/24/25 at 11:45 am to RummelTiger
quote:
That Fred…
Yes, that Fred. In this thread. He asked for the previous account name and said he would fix it. But the poster didn't want to post it for all to see. Not sure why.
quote:
Everyone thinks he’s a meanie, but he’s a teddy bear on the inside!
I said the same. He must be in the Christmas spirit.
0
re: Do you think Chicken cuts some of us longtime posters slack from being banned?
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger on 12/24/25 at 11:38 am to RummelTiger
quote:
Ah, so you’re an alter.
Maybe this one should also be banned for breaking the rules?
Fred offered to reinstate his original account.
re: Only in Florida. Mom holds someone else’s 6 yo under water
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger on 12/24/25 at 10:09 am to Stealth Matrix
quote:
So which is it
I had to take a second to interpret that too. He meant if a parent touches his kid, the parent is getting their arse kicked. At least that's what I think he meant.
re: Pastor charged for sending sexually graphic photos of himself to a minor on Snapchat
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger on 12/24/25 at 9:49 am to ATrillionaire
quote:
Isn't obvious. You made statements of fact, then proceeded to leave room for nuance.
What I meant was "the vast majority" of conservatives would want "all of them" (pedos) prosecuted. The "some conservatives turning a blind eye" comment would fall under the "vast majority" of conservatives comment.
Assuming that's the absolute comment you are talking about. Maybe I worded it poorly. I did not mean all of the conservatives would want pedos prosecuted and then turn around and say that some would turn a blind eye.
re: Pastor charged for sending sexually graphic photos of himself to a minor on Snapchat
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger on 12/24/25 at 9:40 am to ATrillionaire
quote:
Yikes
Please explain the "yikes". Did you misinterpret something I said?
re: Pastor charged for sending sexually graphic photos of himself to a minor on Snapchat
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger on 12/24/25 at 9:34 am to DonJuanDaMiles
quote:
There’s conservatives on this board in this thread saying pedophiles can only be liberal
I've read this thread and I don't believe that anyone said ONLY liberals can be pedos. That's insane. And even if someone did say that, it should quickly be dismissed as stupid. MY point is that conservatives want them ALL prosecuted, regardless of conservative or liberal political affiliation. ALL OF THEM. If it is proven that Trump was a pedo, I guarantee you the vast majority of conservatives will want him prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Will some still turn a blind eye, sure. Also my point, the opposite is true of liberals. The vast majority defend their pedos.
re: Pastor charged for sending sexually graphic photos of himself to a minor on Snapchat
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger on 12/24/25 at 9:23 am to DonJuanDaMiles
quote:
democrats are the one's that want pedo's reading to kids and guys in girls bathrooms.
quote:
And conservatives are the one being pastors to get closer to kids. Which one is better or worse?
Pedos reading storytime to kids and letting men in women's restrooms is worse, obviously. This is considered good practice, legal and supported openly by democrats. YOU support this because of your cult, blindly, because they told you to. Pastors being closer to kids so that they can be pedos is horrible, illegal, immoral. And none of us conservatives support it. We are pissed when it is found out. We are pissed when it is discovered that it was swept under the rug and the person has been transferred to another parish only to do it again. We want it to stop. We want them prosecuted. That's the difference.
re: Pastor charged for sending sexually graphic photos of himself to a minor on Snapchat
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger on 12/24/25 at 8:26 am to Byron Bojangles III
quote:
another one who isn't a leftist tranny
You think only leftist trannies are pedos? Or more importantly, you think someone on the right THINKS only leftist trannies are pedos?
re: Do you think Chicken cuts some of us longtime posters slack from being banned?
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger on 12/24/25 at 8:23 am to ob1pimpbobi
quote:
I am not a long time poster but I was banned a year and still have no idea why. I’ve never even been given a warning.
OK, I've seen this posted many times now. So I would like for some mods to explain, why do you not send an e-mail with an explanation of why these people got banned so that they don't make the same mistake again? And let them know about how long they will be banned. Why is there no explanation? I don't get it.
re: Do you think Chicken cuts some of us longtime posters slack from being banned?
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger on 12/24/25 at 7:37 am to Joshjrn
quote:
Can’t speak for Chicken or TD, but having modded everything from games to boards over the years: yes, absolutely. Though it’s less cutting slack and more that there is an overall body of work to consider. If a brand new poster comes in and stirs up shite, you ban them immediately because they have only shown a propensity to be a problem. If a longtime poster has shown they are generally good but then fricks up, you’re normally going to slap them around a bit and then hope they return to form.
This is sound logic.
I've been here for awhile, never been banned or received a warning. I did have a post deleted once, and still don't understand why. I was given an explanation that basically implied I exceeded my professional expertise on a subject because I wasn't an expert in the matter. Like a layperson giving legal advice or something. Which is not what I was doing.
re: Thicc Fog This Morning
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger on 12/24/25 at 7:28 am to Tarps99
I left Denham at 4:15AM and drove to work in St. Gabriel. It was white knuckle brutal.
re: Do you think Chicken cuts some of us longtime posters slack from being banned?
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger on 12/24/25 at 7:24 am to TigerFred
quote:
WhoKnows
quote:
TigerFred
Do you want the old account back?
If so post the username and we fix it.
Someone is in the Christmas spirit! :cheers:
re: The story of the Caganer.
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger on 12/23/25 at 9:16 am to Cell of Awareness
Eh, I'll stick to Festivus.
re: Ghana Prophet building 8 arcs as world ends on 12.25.25
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger on 12/23/25 at 9:09 am to MrLSU
quote:
Ghana Prophet building 8 arcs as world ends on 12.25.25
This is how I read the subject title in my head, "Prophet Building #8, located in Ghana, arcs after having electrical issues, thus causing the world to end on 12/25/25."
re: Retro TV shows entry theme songs
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger on 12/23/25 at 7:45 am to Harry Rex Vonner
Dallas
The Andy Griffith Show
Dukes of Hazzard
The Andy Griffith Show
Dukes of Hazzard
re: What was your first ever topic on Tigerdroppings?
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger on 12/22/25 at 12:34 pm to LSUTANGERINE
quote:
A 95 year old woman found lying dead in her home by a neighbour – they placed her in a coffin with the tradition of waiting days before burial This worked in Li’s favour though, since she climbed out of the coffin not too long after and went about her day
Wait, I want to talk about this! Can you imagine this happening during the wake? :lol:
re: More Lunacy from /ZeroCovid
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger on 12/22/25 at 10:52 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
RogerTheShrubber
Please tell me that was a skit put on by writers from the Bee. :lol:
re: More Lunacy from /ZeroCovid
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger on 12/22/25 at 10:38 am to shutterspeed
quote:
Probably just posing a hypothetical.
Ah yes. That would make sense. :cheers:
re: More Lunacy from /ZeroCovid
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger on 12/22/25 at 10:31 am to 91TIGER
I find this hard to believe. I can't wrap my mind around someone with this much soy in them actually playing a sport.
re: Fulton County admits they did not follow the rules.
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger on 12/22/25 at 10:19 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
However, this error doesn't indicate the type of fraud oft-referenced in "The Steal"
You're calling it an error. But is it? How do you know that? Did someone not look at these ballots and see they didn't have the proper signatures? And allowed them to be counted anyway? That doesn't seem like an error to me. That seems like fraud.
re: Fulton County admits they did not follow the rules.
Posted by SouthEndzoneTiger on 12/22/25 at 10:12 am to SlowFlowPro
It didn't happen.
OK, it happened, but it wasn't widespread.
We are here now......
OK, it happened, but it wasn't widespread.
We are here now......
quote:
Due to the clerical error, Trump could have won GA. It would not have swung the election, though.
Popular
28
