- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Before the Iran deal is announced anyone want to post their personal red lines?
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:01 pm to hogcard1964
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:01 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
Any feature of Iran having any control whatsoever of Strait is a failure.
Any form of reparations is a failure.
I can see a slight budge from us on sanctions, but very, VERY little.
...and they can have very VERY limited uranium enrichment.
We're at the point right now that if they don't agree to this right now, we have to
Pretty much my thoughts, as well.
0
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:03 pm to SlowFlowPro
Anything that doesn’t wholly replace the IRGC and their obsession with nuclear weapons is an absolute fail.
Creating a problem with Hormuz and solving the problem through negotiation isn’t exactly the WIN people think it is. You essentially told IRAN they have a valid claim to the strait.
Tomfoolery is what this entire admin is as far as I’m concerned.
Trump is too blind to see there was never a deal to be had.
Creating a problem with Hormuz and solving the problem through negotiation isn’t exactly the WIN people think it is. You essentially told IRAN they have a valid claim to the strait.
Tomfoolery is what this entire admin is as far as I’m concerned.
Trump is too blind to see there was never a deal to be had.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:13 pm to SlowFlowPro
It’s really gong to be entertaining how you spin everything if Trump comes out and says Iran has agreed to give up their nuclear material and allow UN inspections.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:24 pm to dkreller
quote:
It’s really gong to be entertaining how you spin everything if Trump comes out and says Iran has agreed to give up their nuclear material and allow UN inspections.
Why? The nuke boogeyman was never a major focus of mine in this war.
This post was edited on 5/23/26 at 7:24 pm
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:24 pm to SlowFlowPro
We ain’t sending them a dime in “reparations”.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:28 pm to jcaz
quote:
We ain’t sending them a dime in “reparations”.
We will just unlock some of their own money like Obama did.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:33 pm to SlowFlowPro
But it was for everyone else. Everyone will be happy and you’ll spin it however your warped brain works.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:34 pm to dkreller
quote:
But it was for everyone else
But you said this
quote:
It’s really gong to be entertaining how you spin everything if Trump comes out and says Iran has agreed to give up their nuclear material and allow UN inspections.
Why would I spin something when I don't care about it?
quote:
Everyone will be happy and you’ll spin it however your warped brain works.
I likely won't say anything
I will only comment if this deal is worse than before the war or only marginal improvement from the Obama deal he ended, b/c that would be hilarious.
*ETA: and I'll say Iran is going to violate any restrictions on their nuclear capability, regardless of which President's admin writes the deal they promise to uphold.
This post was edited on 5/23/26 at 7:36 pm
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:None, none, none and uhh...none. If Trump caves on any of this, he is a giant vagina.
Iran nuclear capability?
Amount of enriched nuclear material? Rate of development?
Reparations?
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Why would I spin something when I don't care about it?
You just started a thread asking for everyone’s red line but you don’t care.
You’re a clown
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:36 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
Any feature of Iran having any control whatsoever of Strait is a failure.
Any form of reparations is a failure.
I can see a slight budge from us on sanctions, but very, VERY little.
...and they can have very VERY limited uranium enrichment.
We're at the point right now that if they don't agree to this right now, we have to bomb.
NO reparations for Iran
NO nuclear enrichment program for Iran
NO oversight/control from Iran over the SOH whatsoever.
NO easing of economy sanctions for Iran until they demonstrate they are trustworthy and compliant with all terms of the peace agreement.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:37 pm to atlgamecockman
quote:
so many on here have a hard on for dropping a NUCLEAR weapon, I just don't get it
Shows that many live in a cartoon version of the world. We aren't nuking Iran. If we do it's the end of civilization.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:37 pm to Bass Tiger
Mate, we don't have the cards.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
: I hope we can all agree that if the spin to defend this deal focuses on analyzing extreme minutia to claim that this deal is marginally better than the Obama deal, that this signals this was a huge failure
I agree. It seems like that should be a given.
Let’s see!
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:41 pm to NawlinsTiger9
quote:
hope we can all agree that if the spin to defend this deal focuses on analyzing extreme minutia to claim that this deal is marginally better than the Obama deal, that this signals this was a huge failure
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:42 pm to dkreller
quote:
You just started a thread asking for everyone’s red line but you don’t care.
My thread is about the red line of posters
You're making it my red line
It's not my red line
I'm pointing this out and you post this:
quote:
You just started a thread asking for everyone’s red line but you don’t care.
You’re a clown
Are you confused?
Iran's nukes aren't my red line
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
They cannot have the ability to make a nuclear weapon.
Ever.
Straits are international and will not be messed with again.
No tolls.
Honestly we should probably include restrictions on targeting radars and the like.
Or turn their asses back to 1600.
Ever.
Straits are international and will not be messed with again.
No tolls.
Honestly we should probably include restrictions on targeting radars and the like.
Or turn their asses back to 1600.
This post was edited on 5/23/26 at 8:24 pm
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:47 pm to dkreller
quote:
You just started a thread asking for everyone’s red line but you don’t care.
You’re a clown ?
It's what he does.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:49 pm to Captain Rumbeard
quote:
Honestly we should probably include restrictions on targeting radars and the like.
Seems silly. You might as well say they shouldn't be able to on retaliate or defend themselves at all. Something about that no one would ever agree to.
Posted on 5/23/26 at 7:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
Yea, dropped in pallets on a beach in the middle of the night.
Shut the f$# up.
Shut the f$# up.
Page 5 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News