Started By
Message

re: Allow student loans to be wiped out via bankruptcy?

Posted on 3/21/25 at 12:31 pm to
Posted by 4cubbies
Member since Sep 2008
59343 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

Anyone with student loans is just lazy.


So basically every MD?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

Allow student loans to be wiped out via bankruptcy?


Absolutely.

If we allow this and the federal government does not assume the risk of private bank student loans we can get back to some sanity.

Right now the federal government assumes the risk so banks don't give a frick.



Posted by ShinerHorns
El Paso
Member since Jul 2021
5617 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 12:34 pm to
Do you not remember Covid? Yes, most MDs are lazy pieces of shite.
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10802 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

People need to stop begging the government to control what degrees people can and cannot pursue. Let them pursue what they want, but also let them suffer the consequences if they make a bad choice.


This, and one more thing...

Stop using the government to guarantee the loans.

Stop the loans. Whatever else you do, stop the loans.

quote:

But to the OP, why are student loans exempt from bankruptcy? That just doesn't make sense.


Because the government guarantees them, so banks will loan to anyone. All that responsibility everyone wants someone else to shoulder for these loans other than the person who took them out? That responsibility would normally belong to the bank. If they made a bad loan and the person couldn't pay it back and discharged it through bankruptcy, the bank took it in the shorts.

But when the government guarantees the loans because they WANT the bank to loan to anyone, the bank can't be held responsible for bad loans.

It's easy.

Stop.

The.

Loans.

I really don't care what happens to the debt already out there (other than the idiotic notion that the college should pay for it). Want to forgive them? O.k., but only if you stop issuing new ones.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62653 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 12:36 pm to
quote:

If we allow this and the federal government does not assume the risk of private bank student loans we can get back to some sanity.
”Sanity” is the fed gov defaulting on their guarantees?
Posted by texn
Pronouns: Y'All/Y'All's
Member since Nov 2019
4060 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 12:40 pm to
As I understand it, the reason for the current rule that student loans cannot be discharged in bankruptcy was, previous to the law change, 3rd year law students would take a bankruptcy law class, learn how easy it would to get such loans discharged in bankruptcy, and immediately file bankruptcy after graduating law school. Because they were abusing the system, the law was changed.
Posted by BamaGradinTn
Murfreesboro
Member since Dec 2008
28798 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 12:40 pm to
quote:

But to the OP, why are student loans exempt from bankruptcy?


Because the loans are guaranteed by the government...the same entity that writes bankruptcy laws.
Posted by Megasaurus
Member since Dec 2017
1423 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 12:44 pm to
She has a chunk in savings for a down payment on her house and she said she couldn’t spend that on student loans. The advisor says “ma’am, no lender is going to let you even sniff a home loan with this amount of debt you have”

Real world shite


no doubt. Unfortunately, there are alot of people that were duped and now on the hook for big financial problems..granted, they should have just paid the loans back then..bad stuff, but they did this to themselves
This post was edited on 3/21/25 at 12:45 pm
Posted by concrete_tiger
Member since May 2020
7477 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

I know a woman who got a degree in Art History and made quite a living working for an auction house.


You found the one. So they need a whole degree program for something a person could learn while working for an auction house for a few years first?

Don't offer government money for shitty degrees. It's too high risk, why are taxpayers on the hook for shite that doesn't matter to society? If they want to offer it, it should be in areas of need. We need stonemasons, ok, encourage that. We need doctors that speak English, focus on that.

Everything else should be privately funded.
Posted by Harry Boutte
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2024
3802 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 12:46 pm to
quote:

Stop using the government to guarantee the loans.

This.
quote:

Stop the loans. Whatever else you do, stop the loans.

Not that.

People should be able to borrow whatever they want for whatever they want as long as they can find someone who will lend them the money on acceptable terms. But if they can't meet the terms, the government shouldn't be the ones stepping in. But if the borrowers father wants to guarantee the loan, that's on them.
Posted by Bronson2017
Birmingham
Member since Feb 2019
2197 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 12:47 pm to
quote:

Where were the fricking parents, such as in the last post of a chick in 200k in debt? Oh, they were insisting little suzy absolutely could not take 1000 and 2000 level classes at a JUCO.


I went to high school with this chick, her parents are enablers to the highest degree. She got all this debt going to pharmacy school and can’t pass the NAPLEX. She’s failed it so many times in Alabama that her only other opportunity is to take it in Georgia.

$200k in student loan debt for nothing.

Whenever she comes over to our house and spills the beans how bad she is financially (recently divorced as well) I grow a couple more gray hairs.

Posted by LemmyLives
Texas
Member since Mar 2019
13733 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 12:51 pm to
quote:

Right now the federal government assumes the risk so banks don't give a frick.

Oh, the feds don't "guide" (regulate) what private institutions do? How will bad credit risks and marginalized communities "gain access?" Look at the Money board post on FHA loans from today. Loans would be tied (rightfully so) to the ability of family co-signers to repay them, and the market and prices for higher ed would rightfully crash. But you'd end up with social engineering from day 1, wiping out whatever you think you're privatizing.
Posted by cadillacattack
the ATL
Member since May 2020
9712 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 12:54 pm to
Posted by wackatimesthree
Member since Oct 2019
10802 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

People should be able to borrow whatever they want for whatever they want as long as they can find someone who will lend them the money on acceptable terms.


Of course. Surely you didn't think I meant to make it illegal for someone to get a loan, did you?

But if the government stops guaranteeing these student loans, it WILL stop the loans for about 98% of the population. Otherwise the only people who will get them will be someone taking out loans for Harvard Medical School or Yale law or something of that nature.

Among the many reasons why the oft-parroted (imagine in a whiney voice) "Make the university pay the loans" narrative is so dumb is because 40% of undergrad students who start college drop out. The ones who major in underwater basket weaving, the ones in pre-med, the ones in English, the ones in engineering, etc. In fact, I would assume that the students hoping to major in STEM fields have a higher drop out rate than the ones majoring in DEI or some other nonsense. Because the course material is so much more challenging.

So who is going to issue a loan to a student when there's a 40+% chance he or she will drop out?
This post was edited on 3/21/25 at 6:59 pm
Posted by Harry Boutte
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2024
3802 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 12:55 pm to
quote:

You found the one.

There are others. I know quite a few people who studied Fine Arts, and none of them are unemployed.

Generally, it's the English majors who struggle - but then, not even half of the ones I know.
quote:

So they need a whole degree program for something a person could learn while working for an auction house for a few years first?


Just because you're ignorant doesn't mean you have to show it off.
quote:

Don't offer government money for shitty degrees.

"Government money" shouldn't be "offered" for ANY degree.
Posted by slidingstop
Member since Jan 2025
1750 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 12:59 pm to
quote:

but you still have the bankruptcy on your record and deal with the real world consequences of that.



how bout just pay them back and we quit giving them out?
Posted by GumboPot
Member since Mar 2009
138911 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 1:00 pm to
quote:

”Sanity” is the fed gov defaulting on their guarantees?


No, sanity is placing the risk were it belongs, on the lender not the tax payer.

That way lenders make better loans.
Posted by Bamafig
Member since Nov 2018
6075 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 1:01 pm to
Allow borrowers to pay back from their 401k or IRA with no penalties. A one time , all or nothing opportunity.
Posted by TechBullDawg
Member since May 2014
2102 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 1:18 pm to
Government backed funding is why tuition is so high. Get out of it and get the schools to fund the students
Posted by Harry Boutte
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2024
3802 posts
Posted on 3/21/25 at 1:25 pm to
quote:

So who is going to issue a loan to a student when there's a 40+% change he or she will drop out?






Personally, I don't care about who's borrowing what for what as long as I"m not on the hook for it. It took me seven years to get my undergraduate degree from LSU because I worked my way through and borrowed $0.00. It's funny because, back then people made fun of me for being in school so long. Now I make fun of them for still being in debt.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram