Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Louisiana
Biography:Class of 1990
Interests:LSU sports
Occupation:self-occupied
Number of Posts:3996
Registered on:10/24/2024
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

Files were being released

:lol:
quote:

panicans

Okay, you're not a serious person.

Good luck.
quote:

The "hoax" is not addressing facts of the case.

How could the facts of the case be addressed if Trump wasn't releasing the files due to it being a hoax?

You're putting yourself in the trick bag here.

quote:

And when did the war start again?

When South Carolina seceded on Christmas Eve, 1860.

Why did they secede that December?
quote:

I'm talking about forced conscription and the ability of rich Yankees buying their way out or buying their sons way out.

It's called "substitution" and it happened on both sides. You think those rich plantation owners were picking up rifles and reporting to the front lines? No.
quote:

I'm talking about paying immigrants right off the boat with no job, not speaking English, money, and 3 hots and a cot to go shoot Johnny Reb.

That's exactly how Wheat formed his battalion in New Orleans:

"To attract even more bellicose souls to his [Roberdeau Wheat] nascent battalion, men who "were actuated more by a spirit of adventure and love of plunder than by love of country," or who filibuster General Henningsen once proclaimed "thought little of charging a battery, pistol in hand," Wheat christened his command "the Tiger Battalion." He then extolled his volunteers, led by Captain White's large company of Tiger Rifles...to continue to comb the docks, thoroughfares, alleyways, hotels, poor houses, and jails of the New Orleans waterfront for more recruits."

Men were 'shanghied' off the docks, including Germans, Poles, Irish, etc... such that many of the troops couldn't even understand the orders given in English or French.

The men fighting for the South weren't all saints. "Johnny Reb", :lol:
quote:

Go learn some history

Indeed.
quote:

But not one single person who was shown to be so close to epstien she was texting him for counsel during a committe hearing has gotten a single iota of scrutiny.

Why should they if it's a "nothingburger"?
quote:

The current house minority leader who invited a post conviction Epstein to campaign functions and asked him for campaign money... therefor opening Epstein up to favors, if money given, from the current house minority leader gets zero scrutiny.

Actual backup is given to Clinton to push back on testimony by the democrats.

Full political cover being thrown around for democrats and democrat friends.


And you think all of that is a "hoax" just because it doesn't involve Trump?
quote:

It's you guys that are accepting of this and building the nationwide dismissal of it.

What in the frick is that supposed to mean? Trump is the one saying it's all a hoax, you think he's one of my "guys"?
quote:

Sorry.

You sure are. You're at least not making any sense.
quote:

Lincoln was a war criminal

The South had every right to secede

:lol:

The historical revisionism of the Lost Causers.

The South seceded before Lincoln was even president.
quote:

This whole story is the biggest nothing-burger in the history of American politics.


So if horrific crimes against nature are committed, but Trump is not involved, it's a "nothingburger"?

All of these resignations and royalty stepping down due to being exposed in the Epstein files is meaningless because Trump wasn't involved?

All of the victims of Epstein's child-sex-slavery ring are meaningless because Trump didn't grab any of them by the pussy?

If a tree falls in the forest and Trump didn't hear it, it didn't happen?
I've been watching football games with the radio on instead of TV sound since the 70s. I can't stand the national broadcasters, they don't know shite about either team. I'd rather listen to the opponent's radio play by play than the national guys. At least they know something about one of the teams.

Hell, I'd rather play music with the game on than listen to those guys.
The NCAA can't be a governing organization without an anti-trust exemption. Without a governing organization, college sports will continue to be the wild west.

Once they have an anti-trust exemption, the NCAA will be able to enforce rules again. Once the NCAA can enforce rules again, fans will bitch about NCAA rules again.
quote:

Since 1950 LSU Has Only Won 56.5% of Their Games Against Ole Miss

And since 1970, LSU has won 67% of their games against Ole Miss.

People don't realize that Ole Miss and Johnny Vaught had the best winning percentage in the country from 1950 to 1970.
The same ones who did it for me: No one.

People today spoil their kids rotten and then turn around and ask what's wrong with kids today. :casty:

I tried to make things technologically easier for my 89 year old mother. Ended up just fricking shite up for her and we ended up just going back to how she had it.

I suggest you just leave it alone if she's happy. How much total money do you think you could save by changing, anyway?

It's being engineered as evidenced by this outright lie:

quote:

Nobody cared about Epstein when he was alive


People were outraged when he was "sentenced" in 2008, How a future Trump Cabinet member gave a serial sex abuser the deal of a lifetime
quote:

Gender is different from sex and should be acknowledged as such.

No it’s not.

What's the difference between "masculine" and "male"?
quote:

something as important as voting

That's exactly why having barriers to voting is problematic. It's SO important, that the bar is set very high to keep someone from doing it.

Should someone have to prove they can read before they can vote? Should they have to prove an understanding of US Civics in order to vote? You may think so until they make the tests such that you can't pass them.
quote:

Also, you’re talking about propriety and referring to people at Orientals?

I'm talking about the suspension of disbelief in the viewers of the films. It's more difficult when races are confused, but it's nothing new to get outraged over, it's just kind of flipped around.

Do you have a problem with the term "oriental"?
I don't even know what that is.

But it's all about suspension of disbelief in the viewer. Sometimes it's harder than others, but it hasn't just been one way.

Did you know that in the first run of the play, Macbeth, the part of Lady Macbeth was played by a man?

Keep in mind, I"m not making an argument for more diversity in the movie about Denmark in the 1750s, just that mixing up races in film is nothing new, it's as old as film itself.

re: Tim Tebow ...

Posted by Harry Boutte on 2/12/26 at 11:01 am to
In the 3 posts you listed, only in 1 of them did I say he was gay.

And those 3 posts hardly indicate any obsession on my part.

Your posts, OTOH...
quote:

You had to go back to Charlie Chan.




Christopher Lee was playing Fu Manchu in the 60s.

The reason I used Chan was to show that, at that time, orientals (and blacks, and hispanics) weren't even allowed to play lead roles in mainstream Hollywood movies.

At least I didn't go here:



:lol:
quote:

she was white and English. That’s an indisputable fact, to cast her as a black woman is nonsensical

Casting black people to play white parts is no worse than casting white people to play oriental parts - regardless of whether it's historical or fiction.

It's also an indisputable fact that white people have never been orientals.

My position is that I don't care for the black Anne Boleyn, nor do I care for the white Charlie Chan, but it has worked both ways.