Started By
Message

re: ?? from a Military Strategic Idiot = me - How can we protect a carrier in Suez canal?

Posted on 5/11/19 at 8:02 am to
Posted by GnashRebel
Member since May 2015
8771 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 8:02 am to
It is complicated and I am no expert. I do know missiles fairly well. There is a complex kill chain that is required to use long range missiles on a carrier group. Long story short, it is harder than it sounds. Additionally the second the shooting starts the group, with a vast amount of firepower at its disposal, would begin dismantling the launch systems, the targeting systems and anything else. It would be a disaster with little gained by attackers and then the full force of the United States would be unleashed.

As for RPGs, they would be a non-factor.

Since the Cole incident the Navy has become more adept at stopping small boat attacks.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
56111 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 8:03 am to
quote:

This is a "kind reminder" to the area of what we have. No need to be a coward like obama.


Yep, they won't be kidnapping any of our guys by Iran without retaliation this time.



This post was edited on 5/11/19 at 8:06 am
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
38559 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 8:06 am to
quote:

?? from a Military Strategic Idiot = me - How can we protect a carrier in Suez canal?


Subs with ICBMs.
Posted by vegas-tiger
NV desert
Member since Dec 2003
2098 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 8:11 am to
They don't. It is only done for "photo ops". East coast Carrier Groups (CGs) do the med side. West coast CGs do the red sea side. The USS Nimitz, is the only carrier that does not fit the Suez canal.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
92211 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 8:17 am to
quote:

Yep, they won't be kidnapping any of our guys by Iran without retaliation this time.


Still can’t believe that happened
Posted by Tridentds
Sugar Land
Member since Aug 2011
23392 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 8:18 am to
Interesting... I was speaking with some people that went on a cruise that passed through the Panama Canal. Something similar came up. They really don't inspect much besides attempting to curtail ballast water discharge in the locks or lake. ship loaded with explosives in the front that detonated while in one of the locks. Would sink a ship and might cause massive damage to one of the locks. The sunken ship would totally block the Panama Canal for weeks by itself. A severely damaged lock gate might shut it down for a month or two.

Talk about disrupting commerce. There is a hell of a lot of oil that goes through the Panama Canal not to mention goods.
Posted by dr smartass phd
RIP 8/19
Member since Sep 2004
20387 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 8:22 am to
quote:

Attacking our fleet in the canal or anywhere else would be like sticking your dick in a hornets nest then lighting yourself on fire with gas.



Pretty much "hell, fire and brimstone."
Posted by dr smartass phd
RIP 8/19
Member since Sep 2004
20387 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 8:28 am to
quote:

within an hour



Within in minutes, someone is going to eat a Trident D5 W-88
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
47867 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Sure. The carrier is vulnerable, but even if you managed to touch it, what then?


How about pinning it in the canal for months or years while the canal is being repaired from attacks at other points along the route.

I dunno - it just harkens back to a fear of leading a cavalry company thru a narrow canyon back in the western frontier days.
Posted by OTIS2
NoLA
Member since Jul 2008
52162 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 8:58 am to
Valid points. But the military can’t be frozen by “what if’s”.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
116658 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 9:18 am to
We're not that concerned about an attack on carriers as much as we are a shutting down of the canal to US ships as retaliation from China (they run the canal). The Marine Corp has a contingency plan for taking over the canal by force. They've done practices at the canal zone.
Posted by ChineseBandit58
Pearland, TX
Member since Aug 2005
47867 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 9:23 am to
quote:

military can’t be frozen by “what if’s”.


True - I was just reacting out of fear - especially when we announce it in advance giving local terrorists time to go rogue and plan something.

It is something I have always worried about - even with commercial shipping thru Suez and Panama - wondering how easy it would be for some radical element to shut them both down for a long long time.

Putting one of our carrier groups thru there prompted me to ask the long held question.

Thanks for all your respectful responses -
Posted by Port Royal
You Name It , I've Been There
Member since Nov 2016
1811 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 9:27 am to
The Egyptians employ a massive security net every time there's a large movement through the Canal. Although carrier fixed wing ops are suspended during transit, helos are allowed to operate, providing air support for the fast rigid boats providing surface security.
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
16098 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 9:37 am to
quote:

how can it be protected from a well planned attack from land based rocket launchers while it is in the canal?


What keeps a cat from jumping into a fenced in yard of Dobermans? Answer... Fear.

Anyone walking by on his daily ahalaoo ackbaring journey poses no threat other than to piss everyone off. Any true threat would be foreign state sponsored. And they know to just leave it at words
Posted by KingOrange
Mayfair
Member since Aug 2018
12565 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 9:42 am to
Getting in late on this but I am positive that we have Assets in the air protecting one of our Mother Ships.
Posted by deltaland
Member since Mar 2011
100209 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 9:42 am to
It takes more than rocket launchers and land based artillery to sink a carrier group. Those ships are fricking strong

It would like shooting a BB gun at your F250
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 9:45 am to
quote:

Seriously - a Carrier Group is a massive national asset -
Which is why the US should be going away from large deck super carriers. Their time has passed.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 9:46 am to
quote:

It takes more than rocket launchers and land based artillery to sink a carrier group. Those ships are fricking strong

It would like shooting a BB gun at your F250


Bingo
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 9:48 am to
Electronic jamming.
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa-Here to Serve
Member since Aug 2012
16604 posts
Posted on 5/11/19 at 9:51 am to
https://news.usni.org/2019/05/10/video-uss-abraham-lincoln-transits-suez-canal

Included in link is a video of the Lincoln in the Suez.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram