- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Woman in Minnesota tried ramming ICE Officer gets unalived. NSFW
Posted on 1/8/26 at 3:31 pm to Antonio Moss
Posted on 1/8/26 at 3:31 pm to Antonio Moss
quote:
You must have some super secret video that no one else has.
You must not have seen it at all, just like the j6 insurrection.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 3:32 pm to Tigerbait46
quote:
non-violent protester.
You lefties are as violent as they come. GTFO
Posted on 1/8/26 at 3:33 pm to TDTOM
except she didn't go straight she turned the wheels all the way to the right avoiding him altogether. just forgot that part?
Posted on 1/8/26 at 3:34 pm to DawgCountry
quote:didn't storm the capital when Trump won.
You lefties are as violent as they come. GTFO
Posted on 1/8/26 at 3:40 pm to OceanMan
quote:
He will be judged by his department and the legal system. She chose to forego that path. What else is there to critique?
And she was never given the option to be judged by the legal system. She made mistakes, but she didn't choose death.
Whatever gray area that could legally justify his actions is separate from the moral reasonableness, necessity, or intelligence of his (and his squad's) actions.
The simple fact that he stepped aside the vehicle as it turned right and continued shooting while out of harms way, along with the fact that she was protesting non-violently before agents chose to escalate the situation, is enough for me say there is plenty to critique.
We're pretending like his choice to kill this woman was the only valid option here. If you're unable to see that and see room for critique, then you're being dishonest. I've offered up plenty of critiques of the woman's decisions that put her at risk, but that doesn't mean this outcome was even close to necessary.
quote:
This situation that she created.
This is not an isolated incident. Have you seen how people in that city treat ICE? Any other city? They are being instigated by thousands of people daily.
Again, are we only going to focus on the actions of one side here? Why do you think those people are showing up? Rashly deploying thousands of poorly prepared, masked men into these cities is begging for confrontation. Now, depending on your politics, you might say it's a justifiable approach for detaining undocumented criminals, but even then, you must acknowledge that it will invite protests, and if they are not prepared to handle that confrontation with professionalism and dignity for human life -- particularly with US citizens who are non-violently protesting -- then yes, they are very much creating this situation.
Personally, I'm not a fan of an authoritatively empowered overreaching government agency asserting itself recklessly without local consent and coordination in ways that directly spark tension in American communities... but that's the drama that your political leaders want to play out, so they can then reinforce their dishonest narratives. Speaking of which, tell me again where the video shows the officer getting "viciously ran over" and needing to recover in the hospital. Is it the video showing the guy walking up and down the street perfectly fine after he fired shots while next to the vehicle? Your dear leaders' statements don't match reality, bub.
This post was edited on 1/8/26 at 3:42 pm
Posted on 1/8/26 at 3:43 pm to Byron Bojangles III
When she put the car in drive to start going forward, the wheels were still turned to the left.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 3:43 pm to MOT
quote:
At what point in general time did this begin to decline in your estimation?
2020-2022
ETA: there was also a significant decline in training when the TASER was introduced. It became the crutch LE relied on which lead to other areas of training being significantly reduced.
This post was edited on 1/8/26 at 3:56 pm
Posted on 1/8/26 at 3:48 pm to SUB
quote:
How? What did they do that was so egregious and out of step with anything to “take into account” what was mentioned?
I'll defer to brass2mouth's expertise on the specific mistakes the officers made that led to escalating the situation toward her panicking and the use of lethal force.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 3:53 pm to TDTOM
Good image. I can't tell when exactly that image was taken. It doesn't look to be right before he fired. From the multiple angles I've looked at, it looks like in each one the wheels are turned to the right before he fired.
In any case. I do believe she should still be alive. But she made some terrible decisions that day.
In any case. I do believe she should still be alive. But she made some terrible decisions that day.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 3:56 pm to QJenk
In the video once she backs up she immediately goes to drive from reverse. Is not like she paused to think about the situation.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 4:06 pm to HogPharmer
quote:
You're suggesting we let the inmates run the asylum?
Good grief.
You're misunderstanding me.
Law enforcement professionals knowingly put themselves in contact in heightened situations with potentially heightened individuals. This requires them to be trained on how to approach these individuals, de-escalate conflict, and reduce the risk of lethal force/tragic outcomes while still getting the job done. I would think the profile of the individual (armed and dangerous? non-violent protester? violent protester? drugged up? witness in shock? driving a vehicle?) influences their approach and how they respond in the moment.
It's the nature of their job to put up with shite, act with emotional maturity and restraint, display incredible patience, and be intentional with their actions given how they assess the situation. Knowing they could be dealing with someone (especially someone behind the wheel) who could be anxious, fearful, and prone to a fight/flight reaction if tensions heighten should influence their approach. I'm not saying handle everyone with white gloves and avoid assertive approaches, but I'm sure a more prepared group of agents would have approached this much more effectively with a lower chance of violence and fatal outcome.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 4:08 pm to TDTOM
quote:
In the video once she backs up she immediately goes to drive from reverse. Is not like she paused to think about the situation.
Correct. I think that is due to her already knowing what she wanted to do. She was about to get arrested I assume? She was trying to run away from the cops like people do all of the time.
She reverses the car to the left, so she could then immediately turn the wheel to the right. That is just basic driving.
Imo, if she wanted to run the cop over, I don't see why she would be reversing the car at all, let alone turning the wheel. Is it possible I'm wrong? Of course. But that's just what I see on the video.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 4:12 pm to Byron Bojangles III
Just tried to kill him twice. No big deal.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 4:13 pm to QJenk
She went forward before she turned. Kind of a big mistake.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 4:14 pm to TDTOM
quote:
This just further shows it was a tactical blunder. You have three guys all in a cross fire situation.
Nobody took charge and this devolved.
Everyone says “well she shouldn’t have been there in the first place” yes, I agree.
However that argument can be made 100/100 times police use force on someone, so the onus is on the police to train for that and adjust their tactics.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 4:16 pm to brass2mouth
I don’t care that she was there. She should have been arrested. Trying to flee by running over someone was a bad idea.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 4:21 pm to brass2mouth
quote:
You can't see her eyes, but my guess is she's probably looking to her left at the agent at her side window. I think it's possible she tried to drive away from the side agent, didn't see the front agent initially, and the front agent interpreted it as life-threatening aggression when she floored it.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 4:21 pm to LSUBFA83
quote:
I'd really like to see what happened just prior to the video because she clearly did something that pissed them off.
She was blocking the road. A choice she made.
This post was edited on 1/8/26 at 4:21 pm
Posted on 1/8/26 at 4:22 pm to brass2mouth
quote:
This just further shows it was a tactical blunder. You have three guys all in a cross fire situation.
Not to mention the bystanders just out of the picture. You can see all of the footsteps along the curb where people had been standing.
quote:
Everyone says “well she shouldn’t have been there in the first place” yes, I agree.
However that argument can be made 100/100 times police use force on someone, so the onus is on the police to train for that and adjust their tactics.
Thanks for bringing your expertise and level head to this thread. It's reassuring to hear the perspective of someone with your experience point out how we can hold LE to a higher standard and specifically how these ICE officers made mistakes.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 4:24 pm to ell_13
quote:
don’t care that she was there. She should have been arrested. Trying to flee by running over someone was a bad idea.
At no point have I ever said she should have been arrested.
I will also add, that that physical arrests in the sense of how 99% of people envision it, is not how the feds handle it. When the feds arrest you they already have a warrant for you. In instances like this they document you (hence why he was filming her) then refer your information and the details to the US Attorney for prosecution.
Popular
Back to top


0










