- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Woman in Minnesota tried ramming ICE Officer gets unalived. NSFW
Posted on 1/8/26 at 5:04 pm to dallastigers
Posted on 1/8/26 at 5:04 pm to dallastigers
quote:
I think federal law requires DOJ to handle any investigations of federal officer shootings in the line of duty.
That would be good news.
0
Posted on 1/8/26 at 5:05 pm to dallastigers
It ain't a stretch to think that one bigger girl in the flannel might've got off on razzing the cops.
And I mean sexually.
It might have been their thing. We just don't know.
And I mean sexually.
It might have been their thing. We just don't know.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 5:05 pm to HogBalls
Everyone knows if you stomp the gas and drive towards a cop, and he has to leap to avoid getting run over, you are getting shot.
There’s literally no way anybody doesn’t know that.
There’s literally no way anybody doesn’t know that.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 5:10 pm to brass2mouth
quote:
What does him being in LE have anything to do with his morals?
I’m not going to play this game when everyone in the country who follows the news sees that we are an hop skip and a jump away from an irreconcilable divide of the citizenry.
Him being in law enforcement isn’t the issue. It’s the provocation of citizens in democrat cities, largely doing nothing of substance but riling people up. Signing up to do that job shows a lack of character.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 5:12 pm to Odysseus32
quote:
It’s the provocation of citizens in democrat cities, largely doing nothing of substance but riling people up.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 5:13 pm to Tigerbait46
quote:
Should that not influence the tactics of these agents?
We are formulating opinions and theories 24 hours after the fact. You want law enforcement, that you wanted defunded anyway, to suddenly have the training and ability to make a split second reaction that appeases you and the victim’s nosey neighbors?
quote:
Especially when dealing with a non-violent protester.
Just because I don’t think she intended to run over an officer doesn’t mean she wasn’t a threat. She still drove towards him, and that makes it a violent situation.
quote:
Approaching the situation with an ounce of social intelligence would have led to a different outcome
You are 100% correct. Had she avoided a situation where she was interfering with the law, she would be alive today. Instead she left behind her child and lover.
quote:
Heck, maybe they'd even have her behind bars now and she'd be spilling the beans on who's funding her!
Posted on 1/8/26 at 5:14 pm to ell_13
Sorry you’re blind.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 5:15 pm to dallastigers
quote:
think federal law requires DOJ to handle any investigations of federal officer shootings in the line of duty.
Supremacy Clause in the constitution keeps it at the federal level unless the courts deem it outside of the agent’s scope (unlikely in this instance) then the state can pick it up.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 5:16 pm to Odysseus32
Sorry you’re so easily manipulated
Posted on 1/8/26 at 5:17 pm to Odysseus32
quote:
Him being in law enforcement isn’t the issue. It’s the provocation of citizens in democrat cities, largely doing nothing of substance but riling people up.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 5:20 pm to Odysseus32
quote:
Him being in law enforcement isn’t the issue. It’s the provocation of citizens in democrat cities, largely doing nothing of substance but riling people up. Signing up to do that job shows a lack of character.
To be fair, the declaration of “sanctuary cities,” circumventing federal laws by a certain political entity shows a lack of character. Not the guy who works for an agency whose obligation is to find/deport those not supposed to be here.
You can attack his tactics and decision making during this incident all you want because you have evidence to support it.
You have nothing but your emotions to say he is of poor character/morals.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 5:25 pm to Stat M Repairman
We get it, big dog, you’re edgy. Here’s your attention.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 5:39 pm to WicKed WayZ
Nah, you're just low IQ and overly emotional. Maybe you're dehydrared.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 5:48 pm to Odysseus32
quote:
It’s the provocation of citizens in democrat cities, largely doing nothing of substance but riling people up
What does federal agents removing non-citizens have to do with provocation of citizens?
Maybe these citizens should get a fricking job and contribute to society instead of obstructing and harassing the people tasked with enforcing our laws.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 5:52 pm to TDTOM
It’s likely due to my phone’s display, but when I first looked at this I briefly thought who is that in black with the rifle pointed straight ahead on the passenger side who wasn’t in the videos.
Posted on 1/8/26 at 5:55 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
Fact remains she was not behaving lawfully (interfering with agents) and the agents were acting lawfully (doing their jobs).
I’m still playing catchup but from what I have seen we don’t know that as a fact. As an identified protestor I can see her potentially doing something.
But was she yelling and screaming and was then trying to leave? Because unless it was in their faces that’s not obstruction, and doesn’t give them the right to surround her to prevent her from leaving, nor using physical force to try to pull her from the car (the real escalation event)
Posted on 1/8/26 at 5:59 pm to HogPharmer
quote:
What does federal agents removing non-citizens have to do with provocation of citizens?
You do realize there are numerous cases that will be on trial for years, at least one of which was on camera, of ICE getting flooded with proof of right for residence or even outright citizenship at the arrest. They confiscate it all.
Then when court comes up “whoooooopsies, we lost it all. Oh well, guilty till proven innocent. Goodbye!”
Dunno how a board so generally distrustful of government can think this department is 100% flawless in execution.
This post was edited on 1/8/26 at 6:00 pm
Posted on 1/8/26 at 6:00 pm to HogBalls
quote:That's what I've been trying to find out for the last two days. Nobody seems to have any info on it. Only speculative posters.
We didn’t see the beginning of this event but I’m curious how her vehicle got in that position in the first place if she wasn’t already in the act of trying to ram them before the video started
Posted on 1/8/26 at 6:01 pm to dallastigers
quote:
It’s likely due to my phone’s display, but when I first looked at this I briefly thought who is that in black with the rifle pointed straight ahead on the passenger side who wasn’t in the videos.
Which video are you referencing?
ETA: Looked back. You may be on to something. AI?
This post was edited on 1/8/26 at 6:08 pm
Posted on 1/8/26 at 6:15 pm to TexasTiger08
quote:
You want law enforcement, that you wanted defunded anyway, to suddenly have the training and ability to make a split second reaction that appeases you and the victim’s nosey neighbors?
Ha! Defunded. Dude, you don't know me. Not everyone outside of the Trump camp is part of the far left vocal minority.
I'm not asking for anything that is out of step with leading standards for LE's. These meathead ICE agents tactically approached the situation in a way that made the situation more dangerous than it needed it to be. This could've been handled in a way that reduced the risk of the shooter even being in the position of making that split second reaction. We have someone from the LE community in this thread making these exact points. I trust his judgment.
Page 55 of 78
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News