- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Will environmental conservation ever become important throughout the South?
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:02 pm to weagle99
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:02 pm to weagle99
A lot of the non-environmental equipment used in the south is necessary to provide conservation to farming and forestry. It goes full cycle.
I would say it's very important to the South.
I would say it's very important to the South.
This post was edited on 7/15/19 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:03 pm to TDcline
quote:
The baws down here don’t give a frick. They just shoot 80 ducks while drinking bud light and make a profile picture with them on their tailgate.
This is mostly true.
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:06 pm to FunroePete
quote:
Saltwater intrusion kills marshes,marshes are the development area for shrimps crabs and such. Put two and two together.
Still don't believe me? Is it just a coincidence that Louisiana has half the seafood output it had 30 years ago?
Edit:prime example of people who have no idea what they're talking about and have strong baseless opinions on incredibly important state issues
I actually live in the area that produces this seafood you speak of, and have many friends in the industry. Here’s some points you’re leaving out
1. The decrease is mainly caused by international competition, so much so that the state just made a law that says you have to advertise if you are selling non-local seafood
2. There isn’t a commercial fisherman alive that will tell you they had a good season, as a way to artificially inflate the price and/or ask for handouts
3. Overfishing. The crabbers will blame it on BP, but their mine fields of traps have caused harm to the population
4. Saltwater intrusion doesn’t kill marshes. Erosion kills marshes
ETA: 5. The price of commercial fishing has gone up due to equipment, fuel, licensing, etc. There are probably way less than half of the full time fisherman as there were 30 years ago due to some combination of these points
This post was edited on 7/15/19 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:09 pm to tigerfoot
quote:I didn't say it was the only factor but all of those are related to resource supply
tigerfoot
You'd have to be incredibly naive to think it hasn't played a large part of the industries woes. So far it's estimated that 25% of louisianas marshes are gone from the 30s and it's growing faster every year.
Ask any shrimper,crabber,oysterman or marine biologist they all say the same thing
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:10 pm to weagle99
Poverty is a huge source of our pollution. I live in a small town on a nice street. But, with weak zoning, there is a shitty rent house on the corner that is subsidized rent. The woman who lives there piles up her trash in the back yard (no fence, you can see it as you drive onto our street) and burns it all - trash bags, plastic, and whatever.
I assume she cannot afford garbage cans as we have city trash pickup. There is also trash scattered around her back yard.
Litter is a big problem in Louisiana.
I assume she cannot afford garbage cans as we have city trash pickup. There is also trash scattered around her back yard.
Litter is a big problem in Louisiana.
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:11 pm to Clames
quote:While I dont agree with all the points the OP made, this is simply not true.
The Northeast has every bit of the trash the South doe
Southerners are just trashy as hell. Litterers should be stopped arrested and made to pick up 1000 times the amount of litter thrown out to repay their debt. If they do not do it, then fines and or jail time.
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:11 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:Yep. If we weren't so bad we coulda had some cool national parks and forests and named them things like:
If Yellowstone was in the south, it would have been clear cut and strip mined 100 years ago, and what's left would have hunting camps all over it. Sorry to say, but its true.
Smokey Mountains
Hot Springs
Mammoth Cave
Kisatchie
Apalachicola
Bienville
Cherokee
Conecuh
DeSoto
Homochitto
Chattahoochee-Oconee
but, we fricked it up with our clear cutting and strip mining.
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:12 pm to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:I'll respond later this afternoon, can't grab all the research pdfs until later
Thib-a-doe Tiger
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:12 pm to HottyToddy7
quote:He referred to the south as "we" in his post.
Why are Yankees and West coasters such pompous assholes?
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:14 pm to weagle99
I'll be the bad guy.
There's a certain demographic in the south that's responsible for all the garbage you see on the side of the road.
There's a certain demographic in the south that's responsible for all the garbage you see on the side of the road.
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:15 pm to Celery
quote:
Hunters are generally amongst the most supportive of environmental conservation. No shortage of those in the South.
Paha! There are plenty of hunters that couldn't give a rat's arse about anything but the animals they hunt.
One of my biggest issues with hunting as a whole is the subset that really doesn't give a shite about anything else but a deer or a duck. They will be the downfall of hunting. They are why I disagree with the whole "hunting is conservation" concept. It's not. Some hunters are conservationists, not all of them. It takes more than buying a license to be considered a conservationist.
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:16 pm to weagle99
I hope so. What is strange is most southerners claim to be outdoorsman, but oppose any measures to protect our environment.
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:16 pm to FunroePete
quote:
I'll respond later this afternoon, can't grab all the research pdfs until later
No need. I know the marsh is eroding (lived there).
I also was around for the BP spill when a lot of commercial fisherman were pissed off because BP paid them off of what was on their W2, and they told BP “well I really made xyz” and BP didn’t pay them that
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:17 pm to Cowboyfan89
quote:
One of my biggest issues with hunting as a whole is the subset that really doesn't give a shite about anything else but a deer or a duck. They will be the downfall of hunting. They are why I disagree with the whole "hunting is conservation" concept. It's not. Some hunters are conservationists, not all of them. It takes more than buying a license to be considered a conservationist.
So if someone only hunts deer and ducks, they can’t be a conservationist? What about all of the other animals that eat your food plots/rice fields?
What about nuisance/predator control? Herd management? The whitetail was headed towards extinction less than 100 years ago, now there’s like 30 million of them
This post was edited on 7/15/19 at 12:20 pm
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:19 pm to Janky
quote:
In LA? I don't think this state has 80 ducks total.
Never been north of I10, have you?
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:21 pm to Clames
quote:not even close
The Northeast has every bit of the trash the South does.
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:24 pm to Thib-a-doe Tiger
quote:I wouldn't be so sure
No need
The USGS says that saltwater encroachment "kills the fresh and brackish water marshes and swamps"
Google that quote and you'll find the link
I never said that sediment settlement wasn't an issue but unless you think you know more about marshes than the US geological survey scientists, I would reevaluate your opinions
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:27 pm to weagle99
quote:
We have some great natural areas but most of the population of the region appears to not care about protecting any of it.
I can't speak for the rest of the South, but Alabama does a good job of using both public and private resources to deliver in this area: Forever Wild, Freshwater Land Trust, Cahaba River Society, Black Warrior River Keeper, etc, etc, etc.
The environment has always been protected better by private interests groups than the gov't. The private groups actually care about what they do as opposed to the gov't which generally doesn't give a shite about the environment (or anything else).
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:27 pm to FunroePete
quote:
unless you think you know more about marshes than the US geological survey scientists, I would reevaluate your opinions
When it comes to what they’re calling a marsh in southern LA, I absolutely do. Our marshes are surrounded by saltwater. Have been forever, not dead
Swamps is a different story
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:27 pm to Jake88
quote:
Smokey Mountains
Was highly resisted by the locals.
quote:
Kisatchie
Mostly was bought at sheriffs sales during the Great Depression after people lost their land for unpaid taxes. If not for that, it wouldn't exist. It wasn't voluntary, and people still bitch quite a bit about all the "government land." They sure don't mind having a place to hunt where they don't have to pay out the arse for a deer lease, though.
This post was edited on 7/15/19 at 12:31 pm
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News