Started By
Message

re: Will environmental conservation ever become important throughout the South?

Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:02 pm to
Posted by BobLeeDagger
In Your Head
Member since May 2016
6912 posts
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:02 pm to
A lot of the non-environmental equipment used in the south is necessary to provide conservation to farming and forestry. It goes full cycle.



I would say it's very important to the South.
This post was edited on 7/15/19 at 12:05 pm
Posted by Reservoir dawg
Member since Oct 2013
14104 posts
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:03 pm to
quote:

The baws down here don’t give a frick. They just shoot 80 ducks while drinking bud light and make a profile picture with them on their tailgate.


This is mostly true.
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
35369 posts
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:06 pm to
quote:

Saltwater intrusion kills marshes,marshes are the development area for shrimps crabs and such. Put two and two together.

Still don't believe me? Is it just a coincidence that Louisiana has half the seafood output it had 30 years ago?

Edit:prime example of people who have no idea what they're talking about and have strong baseless opinions on incredibly important state issues



I actually live in the area that produces this seafood you speak of, and have many friends in the industry. Here’s some points you’re leaving out

1. The decrease is mainly caused by international competition, so much so that the state just made a law that says you have to advertise if you are selling non-local seafood

2. There isn’t a commercial fisherman alive that will tell you they had a good season, as a way to artificially inflate the price and/or ask for handouts

3. Overfishing. The crabbers will blame it on BP, but their mine fields of traps have caused harm to the population

4. Saltwater intrusion doesn’t kill marshes. Erosion kills marshes


ETA: 5. The price of commercial fishing has gone up due to equipment, fuel, licensing, etc. There are probably way less than half of the full time fisherman as there were 30 years ago due to some combination of these points
This post was edited on 7/15/19 at 12:10 pm
Posted by FunroePete
The Big Cheezy
Member since Dec 2012
1531 posts
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

tigerfoot
I didn't say it was the only factor but all of those are related to resource supply

You'd have to be incredibly naive to think it hasn't played a large part of the industries woes. So far it's estimated that 25% of louisianas marshes are gone from the 30s and it's growing faster every year.
Ask any shrimper,crabber,oysterman or marine biologist they all say the same thing
Posted by chinhoyang
Member since Jun 2011
23378 posts
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:10 pm to
Poverty is a huge source of our pollution. I live in a small town on a nice street. But, with weak zoning, there is a shitty rent house on the corner that is subsidized rent. The woman who lives there piles up her trash in the back yard (no fence, you can see it as you drive onto our street) and burns it all - trash bags, plastic, and whatever.

I assume she cannot afford garbage cans as we have city trash pickup. There is also trash scattered around her back yard.

Litter is a big problem in Louisiana.
Posted by tigerfoot
Alexandria
Member since Sep 2006
56254 posts
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

The Northeast has every bit of the trash the South doe
While I dont agree with all the points the OP made, this is simply not true.

Southerners are just trashy as hell. Litterers should be stopped arrested and made to pick up 1000 times the amount of litter thrown out to repay their debt. If they do not do it, then fines and or jail time.

Posted by Jake88
Member since Apr 2005
68182 posts
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:11 pm to
quote:

If Yellowstone was in the south, it would have been clear cut and strip mined 100 years ago, and what's left would have hunting camps all over it. Sorry to say, but its true.
Yep. If we weren't so bad we coulda had some cool national parks and forests and named them things like:

Smokey Mountains
Hot Springs
Mammoth Cave
Kisatchie
Apalachicola
Bienville
Cherokee
Conecuh
DeSoto
Homochitto
Chattahoochee-Oconee

but, we fricked it up with our clear cutting and strip mining.
Posted by FunroePete
The Big Cheezy
Member since Dec 2012
1531 posts
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

Thib-a-doe Tiger
I'll respond later this afternoon, can't grab all the research pdfs until later
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
35478 posts
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

Why are Yankees and West coasters such pompous assholes?
He referred to the south as "we" in his post.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134860 posts
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:14 pm to
I'll be the bad guy.


There's a certain demographic in the south that's responsible for all the garbage you see on the side of the road.
Posted by Cowboyfan89
Member since Sep 2015
12715 posts
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:15 pm to
quote:

Hunters are generally amongst the most supportive of environmental conservation. No shortage of those in the South.

Paha! There are plenty of hunters that couldn't give a rat's arse about anything but the animals they hunt.

One of my biggest issues with hunting as a whole is the subset that really doesn't give a shite about anything else but a deer or a duck. They will be the downfall of hunting. They are why I disagree with the whole "hunting is conservation" concept. It's not. Some hunters are conservationists, not all of them. It takes more than buying a license to be considered a conservationist.
Posted by AUCE05
Member since Dec 2009
42560 posts
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:16 pm to
I hope so. What is strange is most southerners claim to be outdoorsman, but oppose any measures to protect our environment.
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
35369 posts
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

I'll respond later this afternoon, can't grab all the research pdfs until later




No need. I know the marsh is eroding (lived there).


I also was around for the BP spill when a lot of commercial fisherman were pissed off because BP paid them off of what was on their W2, and they told BP “well I really made xyz” and BP didn’t pay them that
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
35369 posts
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:17 pm to
quote:

One of my biggest issues with hunting as a whole is the subset that really doesn't give a shite about anything else but a deer or a duck. They will be the downfall of hunting. They are why I disagree with the whole "hunting is conservation" concept. It's not. Some hunters are conservationists, not all of them. It takes more than buying a license to be considered a conservationist.



So if someone only hunts deer and ducks, they can’t be a conservationist? What about all of the other animals that eat your food plots/rice fields?


What about nuisance/predator control? Herd management? The whitetail was headed towards extinction less than 100 years ago, now there’s like 30 million of them
This post was edited on 7/15/19 at 12:20 pm
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
68299 posts
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

In LA? I don't think this state has 80 ducks total.




Never been north of I10, have you?
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
One State Solution
Member since May 2012
55588 posts
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

The Northeast has every bit of the trash the South does.
not even close
Posted by FunroePete
The Big Cheezy
Member since Dec 2012
1531 posts
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

No need
I wouldn't be so sure
The USGS says that saltwater encroachment "kills the fresh and brackish water marshes and swamps"

Google that quote and you'll find the link

I never said that sediment settlement wasn't an issue but unless you think you know more about marshes than the US geological survey scientists, I would reevaluate your opinions
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
41103 posts
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

We have some great natural areas but most of the population of the region appears to not care about protecting any of it.



I can't speak for the rest of the South, but Alabama does a good job of using both public and private resources to deliver in this area: Forever Wild, Freshwater Land Trust, Cahaba River Society, Black Warrior River Keeper, etc, etc, etc.

The environment has always been protected better by private interests groups than the gov't. The private groups actually care about what they do as opposed to the gov't which generally doesn't give a shite about the environment (or anything else).
Posted by Thib-a-doe Tiger
Member since Nov 2012
35369 posts
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

unless you think you know more about marshes than the US geological survey scientists, I would reevaluate your opinions



When it comes to what they’re calling a marsh in southern LA, I absolutely do. Our marshes are surrounded by saltwater. Have been forever, not dead

Swamps is a different story
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98180 posts
Posted on 7/15/19 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

Smokey Mountains


Was highly resisted by the locals.

quote:

Kisatchie


Mostly was bought at sheriffs sales during the Great Depression after people lost their land for unpaid taxes. If not for that, it wouldn't exist. It wasn't voluntary, and people still bitch quite a bit about all the "government land." They sure don't mind having a place to hunt where they don't have to pay out the arse for a deer lease, though.

This post was edited on 7/15/19 at 12:31 pm
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram