Favorite team:McNeese State 
Location:
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:
Number of Posts:13040
Registered on:9/4/2015
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

New manager has a team meeting every morning

He said "Micromanager: challenge accepted!!"

:lol:

I don't know if theres one I hate, but theres some that I get tired of seeing all the time.

What I do hate is when people just assume you know what an acronym means.
quote:

The arrests are the result of an investigation into the theft of two Generac Generators owned by VPSO from a VPSO storage facility. The incident occurred in February 2019.

Not that I'm condoning crime, but if you're going to commit crime, don't commit it against the guys paid to stop it or investigate it when it happens.

Dumb and cheap is no way to go through life, baw.
quote:

Dude, did you even read my post

I did.
quote:

The irony is

that you seem to think we are talking about The Lord of the Rings where the author controls the entire environment and nothing outside of the book impacts the story.

The Bible is a record of real events, taking place at some point in history. That means that there are things that may not have been recorded in the book that impact how the book is understood and interpreted. I doubt anyone that wrote those books thought people would be debating the meaning of it 2000 years later without using spoken word and by sending written messages over invisible signals.

:lol:

So naturally, there are details that they assumed their audience would understand that didn't require explanation. A prime example of that is Jesus telling people "if someone makes you go a mile, go with him two". Jews would have understood what that meant in that time. How many non-Jewish people know what that means today? Someone made a comment in a discussion about The Chosen in the M/TV Board that most people today probably wouldn't understand how reviled the tax collectors like Matthew were back then, but that's not really explained.

It wasn't written in such a way that every verse can stand on its own without some understanding of the culture at the time.

Maybe we can agree to disagree on that, I don't know.
quote:

This is another fundamental misunderstanding of the Jewish calendar and how it works based upon New Testament scholars who don’t understand what they’re looking at

You keep arguing that the issue is with how the scholars interpret it, but seems to me the issue is your interpretation and lack of consideration to anything outside of the Bible, like historic norms. You can take it literally all you want--the non-biblical evidence that inclusive reckoning was the norm of the time is strong. So the reason biblical scholars don't take his words literally in this case is because it didn't mean 3, 24 hour days.

quote:

And no, I am not basing this off of Palm Sunday specifically. I was just presenting a coherent chronological order.

So by your own admission, Nissan 10 doesnt have to align with Palm Sunday; you just did it because of the literal interpretation of Matthew 12:40.

The minute you consider that maybe it wasn't meant literally, or that the way they kept time was not the same way we do, that opens the possibility that the crucifixion occurred on what we would know as Friday.

In the end, nobody knows for sure, and it doesnt really matter. The Church could have easily decided to treat Easter the same way Christmas is treated--i.e., moving based on where a specific date/event falls. The whole "controversy" (if it even is one) comes from the setting of it on a particular day of the week that wasn't even used by the Jews at the time. The "7th day" was always the sabbath for them. April 7th, 2026 is a Tuesday, i.e., not a Sabbath (which we would equate to "Saturday" in current times).

Nisan 15 (according to the sources I've seen) fell on April 1/2, 2026 (Wednesday/Thursday).
quote:

that's the problem with multiple interpretations.

I mean, I've always kind of laughed at the fact that even the 4 gospels aren't consistent on the events that are documented in each. The where, who, how seems to vary by Gospel, which is wild to me...:lol:
Before I read it, let me ask you this--what qualifications does Pastor Gabriel have that I should trust over the rabbi, Catholic priest, and university professor that the show consults with?

I'm not asking this to discredit him, but there is a stark difference between some seemingly random Protestant pastor on the internet and the 3 men that the production company chose to consult with.

Father Mike Schmitz recently put out a video that is very clearly alluding to The Chosen when he essentially criticizes the way people have tried to recharacterize Judas's motivations for betraying Jesus. We only know what is portrayed in the Gospels, which is that he was a thief, and he betrayed him for 30 pieces of silver. That doesnt necessarily prescribe motive. Maybe it was as simple has he was looking for a quick buck. Maybe he just got tired of Jesus, but why not just walk away if that were the case? Others did. The story The Chosen tells, while not in the Bible, at least gives some rationale to why he did it. Is it accurate? Who knows. And ultimately, all that matters is that he did betray him--the reasons don't matter.

They make it clear from the start that it's a TV show based on the Gospels. They never claim to remain 100% true to the phrasing of every verse. I guess if people feel their faith is threatened by that, they shouldn't watch.

But I'll fall back to what I said before: it's a much better show to watch--even if they take liberties with the presentation of certain events, or the creation of back stories--than most shows on TV or streaming today.

But, I love to make this point also--taking issue with some creativity in a show based on the Gospels is no different than taking issue with movies or TV shows based on true stories. If someone wants to take issue with those--fine. But the only reason people seem to get more frustrated with The Chosen doing it is because it's based on Jesus.

No one really cares that the T.C. William Titans actually spanked everyone, or that Gerry didn't get hurt until after the state championship. That doesn't make a great movie.

You wouldn't have much of a TV show if they didn't do some of this. Episode 1 would be Jesus calling his disciples, then Episode 2 is them at some rando's wedding...how did we get here again?

:lol:
quote:

Sunday - Nisan 10
- Exodus 12:3 - The lamb is chosen and taken into the home for four days of inspection.
- The Triumphal Entry. Jesus enters Jerusalem, presenting Himself as the Lamb of God.

You still haven't actually proven how anything indicates that these events would have fallen on what we currently know as Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, etc.

It appears that you're using what we currently recognize as "Palm Sunday", the entry into Jerusalem, as the basis for your claim, when theres nothing to suggest this to be the case. The closest we get is Jesus entry occurring 5 days before Passover, which would have been Nissan 10. But no indication is given that this would be the same day that we now call Sunday.

You also appear to be basing "3 days" on 24 hour days. Didn't the Jews of that time use "inclusive reckoning"? If so, then Friday would have had to be "Day 1" in order for Sunday to be "Day 3".




quote:

Go actually read the Bible yourself - look at what I wrote - read the verses

I mean, I most certainly will because I'm genuinely curious to see if theres any real indication within the Gospels or Acts. But so far the only time frame I've seen for his arrival was 5 days before Passover in John. That gives no indication of what day of the week that would have been.

All I know is that every attempt I've ever seen to correlate the Jewish calendar to the Gregorian calendar between the years that Jesus's ministry is assumed to have occurred only produces one year (AD 34) with Passover landing on a Thursday.

The two most popular years (30 and 33) both presumably had Passover occur on a Friday.
quote:

Because they aren’t reading the Bible in its totality

You think a biblical scholar doesn't understand things necessary to interpreting the Bible better than you?

:lol:
quote:

Thursday. He was crucified on Thursday

How are you coming to this when many biblical scholars believe he was crucified on Friday, April 3, 33 AD based on all of the evidence in the Bible?


quote:

In first century Jewish culture, the Sabbath ended on Saturday after sunset. I hope this helps.

Not only that, but I believe they counted that "day", even if it was only part of a day.

So:

Crucified on Friday afternoon (Day 1)
Laid in the Tomb Saturday (Day 2)
Resurrected on Sunday (Day 3)

It's not 24 hour days. It's just what day of the week it happened on.
quote:

Why would God refuse worship?

Are we talking about the same guy that constantly said "the first shall be last and the last shall be first" and taught his disciples to serve others?

quote:

Not only did Nicodemus not accept Jesus at this time in scripture

John 3:2 literally says "He [Nicodemus] came to Jesus at night and said to him, 'Rabbi, we know that you are a teacher who has come from God, for no one can do these signs that you are doing unless God is with him."

No where does it say Nicodemus didn't accept him.
I swear they've been running this sale 2 weeks at a time for the last 2 months. I've gone in 3 or 4 separate times over the last 2 months and this same sale has been going on every time.
quote:

I've also learned that you can cut a board twice and it's still too short.

:lol:

One of the great mysteries of working with lumber.

Always amazes me when I measure things 3 or 4 times, cut the board, and that damn thing is still to long/short. Wth, board?! Doesn't happen often, but when it does, I just quit for the day.
Ole boy must have complained one too many times about those nasty Peeps in his basket instead of another Cadbury egg.

:lol:
quote:

In the show it portrays Jesus as a friend of someone that just had a hard time fitting in. Which I’m not saying he isn’t… but that’s not exactly accurate for Matthew and why God revealed this to us in scripture because we ourselves are sinners, and he is a friend to us who believe.

*insert Andrew saying "what?!" here*

They made it clear multiple times throughout the early seasons that the Jews hated tax collectors. Matthew was even disowned by his own father, and they were basically "punished" for his turning on the Jewish people.

Peter even makes it a point to tell Jesus "he sinned against our people" in the "70 times 7" conversation.

Some of these assertions come off as people having not watched the whole show, or not paying attention.

If a TV show is a threat to anyone's religious beliefs, then the TV should probably never be turned on, because there's far worse on other shows than one that might take some creative liberties with how certain unwritten things are portrayed.

Even the Sermon on the Mount scenes get people riled up, because why would Jesus need to prepare? Well, first of all, he was fully human. So do people think he just didn't do normal human things? Like he automatically knew how to walk as an infant, talk? Didn't have to go to school? He still prayed to God, even though he was fully God as well.

Maybe the prep work wasn't for him, but for Matthew. As far as Matthew "critiquing" the sermon--those guys still didn't fully understand who he was, or what Messiah meant. There are plenty of examples in the Gospels of the disciples doubting Jesus, or trying to suggest something different to him than what he knew to be his mission.

I haven't seen one moment that is actually in the Bible that seems truly out of line with the Bible.
quote:

Do we know for certain it’s the final season?

It's not.

They've said all along that Season 7 will be the resurrection. Which is fitting, since, you know, 7 is the number of completion.

From the very outset of the series, they made it clear that it was a TV drama. The things that are in the Bible they do well. Yes, they take creative liberties with some things (like backstories for characters, characters not mentioned in the bible), but they are doing that with a team of religious leaders. The funny thing to me is how much people get bothered about how Matthew is portrayed. If it bothers you that much that he is portrayed as on the spectrum, you should probably ask yourself why.

Let's face it, the Gospels and Acts don't describe every facet of Jesus's ministry or the people around him. We don't know for sure if Peter was married at the time he was called--his wife may have already passed away for all we know.

I've seen complaints about the "You are Peter, and on this Rock I will build my church scene" where people think they changed it to him meaning the entire group, or the crowd, but ita very clear that that was not the intent at all. None of the Apostles took it that way.

The only gripe I've seen that might have some merit is regarding Judas's motivation for betraying Jesus, but even that is debatable. Maybe it was truly about the money.
quote:

$5 Pizza Village coupon to offer for NIL.

Need to get that up to a $25 gift card to Deano's and they'd have something going on.

Way better than PV.

re: Federal Duck Stamp

Posted by Cowboyfan89 on 4/1/26 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

If you decide to buy a digital stamp, you must always have your phone with you.

Ya'll act like printers aren't a thing...:lol:
quote:

If you're defending the thieves you must be part of it

Again, alot of assumptions being made on your part.

I'm not defending anything. My only point was that it's not as simple as what you suggested.

There's plenty of examples of developers trying to avoid permitting by using agricultural land (Crop land, not pasture; doesn't work on pasture) and still having to go through permitting because the Corps doesn't care about ag use.

Also examples of the Corps hammering crop guys and bankrupting them simply for trying to use cropland as cropland.

The Corps can be a nasty SOB at times.
quote:

But wait, if you give this rich rancher thousands of dollars to keep raising cattle where he currently raises cattle it will be OK to build here.

Truth.

:lol:

I'm assuming you're referring to the ag (aka PCC) exemptions.

If thats the case, then you're mistaken. It's not quite that simple.

quote:

It's going to destroy the ecosystem if you build a house here because we found one plant that sometimes grows in a marsh.

Again, not quite that simple, but not too far off either, especially with regard to the Corps methods. I've seen some pretty crappy "wetland" calls, but that has a lot to do with the pitiful training that exists for both the private sector folks and even the Corps guys. The BS that gets made up thats not even remotely part of the methods is incredible.