re: Why did Hurricane Michael not get nearly the coverage that Hurricane Florence did?

quote:

---

1 it was very fast moving and not expected to be bad

2 it was heading to a predominantly all republican area so MSM doesnt care if non liberal normal people die

3 they learned with Florance that they werent going to be able to spin anything because trump has his shite together with his response to these things before and after so not worth their time if they cant score points

---

If there’s such a thing as a conservative snow flake...you’re it buddy.

Didn't take 10 damn days to reach the coast

Moved fast

Hit a "relatively" less populated area

No real lingering flooding or rain threat

But it's been top story on CNN for over 2 days. It's gotten plenty of coverage.

quote:

---

It went from landfall to the Carolinas in like 12 hrs.

---

A friend up in North Carolina, Raleigh I think, was posting pictures on Facebook of damage he took during a break in the storm. Was shocked, couldn't believe it had made it that far.

No one outside the south and some midwestern states knows anything at all about the land mass between Tampa and NOLA. It shouldn’t matter but it’s true. It’s nothing political.

Carol Blasey Ford... mostly.

Diane Feinstein...a little

Florence went to affluent communities.

Florence was a woman's name.

I think it is pretty obvious.

It was rapid forming and it went from a CAT2 to a CAT4 pretty much overnight, but I am sure there will be some guinesses who have some conspiracy theory as to why the media didn't cover it as much.

The damn thing starrred Sunday

Snowbirds dont live in the Redneck Riviera.





Oh, and...because you touch yourself.

Not enough time. Only took 3 days. They need a week of build up, commercials.