- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What Would Happen To The US Economy If Everyone Lived Modest?
Posted on 8/13/19 at 9:26 pm to greenbean
Posted on 8/13/19 at 9:26 pm to greenbean
quote:
Hondas and Toyotas of today go for hundreds of thousands of trouble-free miles. I'm in my 50s, when I was growing up people would be scared of a vehicle when it reached 6 digits, now a Toyota ain't even broken in at that mileage.
Trucks and suburbans built in the 70’s and 80’ were famous for going 200k-300k miles
Posted on 8/13/19 at 9:26 pm to tgrbaitn08
quote:
So almost 20k?
No. Learn to read, moron. Not even a tool like you can move the goalposts that much.
But you'll try... Cause you're insecure.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 9:27 pm to OweO
I'll always live modestly and bank on being in the minority.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 9:29 pm to Sweltering Chill
quote:
Agreed, i love driving and road trips.. i actually wish i could drive more for work, as opposed to flying which has gotten to be a real pain.
I’m actually lucky enough to fly private every now and then but if I have to drive over 4-5 hours I’ll make it an over night trip which also gets old
Posted on 8/13/19 at 9:43 pm to tgrbaitn08
Vehicles are more reliable than ever. You are dumb
Posted on 8/13/19 at 9:49 pm to OweO
If You mean if people stop doing things like taking loans for consumption purposes, it would hit hard. It’s one of those double edged swords: people are much better off saving, but the economy needs then to borrow and spend. The auto industry depends on people taking consumption loans.
I said hit hard – it is hard for probably five years or so, until things adapted. That would be a long and tough five years.
I said hit hard – it is hard for probably five years or so, until things adapted. That would be a long and tough five years.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 9:49 pm to OweO
People would invest more money and become wealthier or have money for retirement thus eventually leading to a better economy due to smart financial decisions.
Buying shite on credit that loses its value way before the term of the loan is up causes people to drown in debt and hurts their ability to spend on stuff once they max out their credit
Buying shite on credit that loses its value way before the term of the loan is up causes people to drown in debt and hurts their ability to spend on stuff once they max out their credit
Posted on 8/13/19 at 9:54 pm to crazyLSUstudent
You poor young little naive kids these days have no idea how well things used to be built back in the good old days.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 9:56 pm to tgrbaitn08
We are in between the last 2. I fear the halcyon days are waning. Pain is ahead in the fog of what’s to come.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 9:58 pm to fr33manator
We have a group a pussies coming into society and have been for the past 10-15 years.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 10:01 pm to tgrbaitn08
quote:
I’d say I drive more than the average person but I wouldn’t say I’m that much above average
130 miles a day is definitely way above average
Posted on 8/13/19 at 10:04 pm to teke184
quote:
By contrast, the "Cash For Clunkers" event under Obama not only didn't really create any additional sales of new cars (it only moved already planned sales forward a few months), it ended up killing the used car market and hurt sales in aftermarket parts that would have been used to maintain those cars.
As opposed to letting those businesses go under resulting in hundreds of thousands of people losing their jobs, I think it was a pretty good trade-off.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 10:04 pm to tgrbaitn08
quote:
You poor young little naive kids these days have no idea how well things used to be built back in the good old days.
According to the New York Times, in the 1960s and 1970s, the typical car reached its end of life around 100,000 miles, but due to manufacturing improvements such as tighter tolerances and better anti-corrosion coatings, in the 2000s the typical car lasts closer to 200,000 miles.[4]
Posted on 8/13/19 at 10:05 pm to NewIberiaHaircut
quote:
I'll always live modestly and bank on being in the minority.
Most people live below or within their means. The economy would collapse if not. The overwhelming majority of Americans are current on their bills and have good credit.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 10:36 pm to N2cars
quote:
Most people live below or within their means. The economy would collapse if not. The overwhelming majority of Americans are current on their bills and have good credit.
Sarcasm?
Posted on 8/13/19 at 10:50 pm to crazyLSUstudent
quote:
Vehicles are more reliable than ever.
This is true as far as total milage goes but are we better off now and are they really more reliable for the $?...
In 1964 a new Mustang and Corvette had respective manufacturer's suggested retail base prices of approx. $2000 and $4000... ..that would be $16,000 and $33,000 in 2019 money. But today's manufacturer's suggested base prices are $27,000 and $56,000... not quite double the relative cost but getting close. We might expect more milage today but at what cost?... is that at per dollar spent per mile?
Then when you consider the current tangible commodity investment value of 1960's cars today can easily be 10 times or more it's original cost depending on desirability... and simplicity of build lends itself to keeping those cars running for up to 100 years... and then it is doubtful the majority of today's cars will have any worth at all in 50 years... We have a lot more to consider when determining whether or not today's cars... or cars from 50 to 80 years ago are "better".
This post was edited on 8/13/19 at 10:54 pm
Posted on 8/13/19 at 10:52 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
130 miles a day is definitely way above average
It used to be more than that
Posted on 8/13/19 at 10:57 pm to mmmmmbeeer
... no, it didn’t “save” Jack shite.
All it did was move up sales that were going to happen within the next few months to that month, cannibalizing their own sales to get one really good month.
There were only going to be X number of cars sold for that year. That program cost a shite ton of taxpayer money to sell all of them in month 1 rather than across months 1-6.
And on top of that, the companies it ended up benefitting tended to be the foreign automakers like Toyota, Honda, etc, as opposed to domestic automakers like Ford, GM, and Chrysler, the latter two of which had just gotten massive government bailouts from the government in 2008-2009.
All it did was move up sales that were going to happen within the next few months to that month, cannibalizing their own sales to get one really good month.
There were only going to be X number of cars sold for that year. That program cost a shite ton of taxpayer money to sell all of them in month 1 rather than across months 1-6.
And on top of that, the companies it ended up benefitting tended to be the foreign automakers like Toyota, Honda, etc, as opposed to domestic automakers like Ford, GM, and Chrysler, the latter two of which had just gotten massive government bailouts from the government in 2008-2009.
Posted on 8/13/19 at 10:59 pm to teke184
Not only that, but it put a lot of cars out of commission that still had value. We could have sold them to other countries, parted them out, etc.
Instead we bricked them
Instead we bricked them
Posted on 8/14/19 at 5:51 am to OweO
Nothing. There are tons of people living for free in this country. So if everyone lived modest, it would just even out.
Popular
Back to top


0








