Started By
Message

re: Waukesha Christmas Parade Massacre Trial - Brooks Gets 6-Life Sent. + 762.5 yrs in prison

Posted on 10/24/22 at 2:55 pm to
Posted by MFn GIMP
Member since Feb 2011
23008 posts
Posted on 10/24/22 at 2:55 pm to
quote:

Yeah but did you have any lawful law that showed he DIDN'T own all the land?

I wish I still had the, handwritten, letter he wrote detailing all of that.
Posted by Dizz
Member since May 2008
16149 posts
Posted on 10/24/22 at 2:55 pm to
They start demanding all sorts of contracts and bonds be posted it really is wild. I don't think he gets more than 5 minutes into his closing before getting muted. I also love how the judge took a week off after the trial because she knew it would be a shite show.
Posted by Bruco
Charlotte, NC
Member since Aug 2016
3026 posts
Posted on 10/24/22 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

also love how the judge took a week off after the trial because she knew it would be a shite show.


Her husband better get ready, she’s going to be wine drunk by noon all next week.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
59320 posts
Posted on 10/24/22 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

He's going to do himself a disservice tomorrow when he starts interrupting. The jury is going to hate him even more



Helluva time for me to start working out of the office.
Posted by WhiskeyThrottle
Weatherford Tx
Member since Nov 2017
7254 posts
Posted on 10/24/22 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

Long story short is that the US government is illegitimate, they have secretly sold you into slavery and collect money from some entity and therefore hold a secret bank account with hundreds of thousands of dollars in it under the name the US government has given you (which is why they don't "consent" to their legal name.) They believe that only a living breathing human can bring a claim against them - which is why he kept asking about who the plaintiff was and is the State of Wisconsin a person or an entity. Because of all of that they don't think laws apply to them. He is also a Moorish Sovereign Citizen who believes that he is a descendent of the Moors and is not subject to any US law due to a secret treaty the US made Morocco in the early 1800s.

They are insane.


I always want someone to ask a Sovereign citizen how many times they've used that argument with law enforcement and it's worked. I'm going to say they would like and say a lot, but the real answer is likely 0.

I don't know if there are any rules or laws with Sovereign citizens, but if there are, I'm going to assume that running people over and killing them isn't something they allow.
Posted by Gris Gris
OTIS!NO RULES FOR SAUCES ON STEAK!!
Member since Feb 2008
49636 posts
Posted on 10/24/22 at 4:12 pm to
He needs to be in the other courtroom during the reading of instructions and closing arguments. He will need to be muted many times, I suspect.
Posted by Gris Gris
OTIS!NO RULES FOR SAUCES ON STEAK!!
Member since Feb 2008
49636 posts
Posted on 10/24/22 at 5:50 pm to
I'm watching some of what I missed this morning when he blocked himself from view with the boxes and then yelled and waved his hands around.
Posted by UnluckyTiger
Member since Sep 2003
43180 posts
Posted on 10/25/22 at 7:23 am to
Where does one watch this unfold today?
Posted by IT_Dawg
Georgia
Member since Oct 2012
26710 posts
Posted on 10/25/22 at 7:26 am to
Morning court watchers. Big day for Darrell. Does he spend the majority of the day in the adjacent court room? Do we get through instructions and closing arguments? If, so, does the jury come back today with a verdict of guilty on all counts? Does Darrell get shocked? Stay tuned to find out…….


Also, for those who aren’t following:
- Jury will be sequestered throughout deliberations
- each side gets 1 hour for closing, State says they only need 30-45mins
- Brooks will be on tight leash for what he says in closing
- jurors will begin deliberations today if time permits, with a 7pm cutoff for starting. If they start before that, they can go into the night until they want to break for the evening
- if verdict comes back quickly, we could have sentencing this week depending on how many Victims want to speak. Judge blocked off the whole week for trial
Posted by IT_Dawg
Georgia
Member since Oct 2012
26710 posts
Posted on 10/25/22 at 7:28 am to
quote:

Where does one watch this unfold today?


It will pop up on this channel when they go live
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
23044 posts
Posted on 10/25/22 at 7:33 am to
Things Darrell Brooks will almost certainly bring up in his closing argument:

Jury nullification
Admiralty law
Subject matter jurisdiction
His 1st, 5th, 6th, and 14th amendment rights
Lawful law
Illi-noise v Allen
Posted by GruntbyAssociation
Member since Jul 2013
9753 posts
Posted on 10/25/22 at 8:09 am to
Here for my daily dose of

State of Wisconsin v. Jackwagon
Posted by MasterDigger
Member since Nov 2019
2970 posts
Posted on 10/25/22 at 8:25 am to
I noticed that the judge started using his tactics against him...
He had said multiple times that silence was a 'tackit' tacit agreement.

He then refused to answer the judge's question multiple times and she stated that she would take his silence as a revocation of his privilege for witnesses or jury instruction or whatever topic they were on.

I think she sought advice from other judges and they told her to take control and to use her authority to do so.

Today is going to be tough no matter which judge was overseeing the mess about to come.
Posted by GruntbyAssociation
Member since Jul 2013
9753 posts
Posted on 10/25/22 at 8:30 am to
quote:

Things Darrell Brooks will almost certainly bring up in his closing argument


Subject matter jurisdiction
Subject matter jurisdiction
Subject matter jurisdiction
Subject matter jurisdiction
Subject matter jurisdiction
Subject matter jurisdiction
Subject matter jurisdiction
Posted by autauga
Member since Sep 2015
3684 posts
Posted on 10/25/22 at 8:33 am to
Wonder if Brooks might put up a fight and refuse to come to court. About all he has left.

I was wrong , he showed up.
This post was edited on 10/25/22 at 8:34 am
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
97070 posts
Posted on 10/25/22 at 8:33 am to
quote:

I think she sought advice from other judges and they told her to take control and to use her authority to do so.


No doubt. She changed her whole demeanor from one day to the next. Good for her
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
23044 posts
Posted on 10/25/22 at 8:35 am to
We're starting off hot. He just said "i am not that name. My client, the strawman, its name is stated in capital letters"
Posted by Scruffy
Kansas City
Member since Jul 2011
77270 posts
Posted on 10/25/22 at 8:41 am to
quote:

"i am not that name. My client, the strawman, its name is stated in capital letters"
My favorite argument.

If he isn’t Brooks and he is just representing Brooks, then he isn’t the one going to prison.
Posted by Ingeniero
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2013
23044 posts
Posted on 10/25/22 at 8:46 am to
Judge agrees with Brooks to delay sentencing until next week if (when) there's a conviction.
Posted by MasterDigger
Member since Nov 2019
2970 posts
Posted on 10/25/22 at 8:47 am to
quote:

If he isn’t Brooks and he is just representing Brooks, then he isn’t the one going to prison.

He is not a licensed lawyer, so if he is not representing himself as Brooks, how could he represent someone else?
Jump to page
Page First 86 87 88 89 90 ... 184
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 88 of 184Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram