Started By
Message

re: Water experts debate 1,500-mile aqueduct from Cajun Country to Lake Powell

Posted on 8/16/22 at 12:18 pm to
Posted by CHEDBALLZ
South Central LA
Member since Dec 2009
23251 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 12:18 pm to
I Googled worlds largest pump station and apparently Google ain't always right, who knew, LOL.
Posted by mikelbr
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
49072 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 12:18 pm to
I thought about this exact thing last year when we drove around Mead and Powell. I'm just an IT guy from Baton Rouge but even I thought about it.

But I suppose if the wetlands and gulf coast do in fact need that water, It'll never happen.
Posted by mikelbr
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
49072 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 12:19 pm to
quote:

Pretty sure 200 miles north of Nola puts you in redneck Mississippi piney woods country. Not cajun country swamps.




200 miles of river, not a straight shot. I did a double take at that too.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
66109 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 12:35 pm to
You would think they would have glossed over that at least once. They do t care. They are locusts
Posted by mikelbr
Baton Rouge
Member since Apr 2008
49072 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

You would think they would have glossed over that at least once. They do t care. They are locusts




Oh I believe you. I was just driving a minivan through that area on vacation and casually wondering about it. But I'm a complete retard when it comes to eco systems and shite like that.
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
24018 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 12:39 pm to
quote:

But I suppose if the wetlands and gulf coast do in fact need that water, It'll never happen.


Louisiana can have the sediment. Give those poor westerners a little water man! Most of the Mississippi water goes into the GOM. There's plenty of water you rubes!
Posted by michael corleone
baton rouge
Member since Jun 2005
6554 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 12:40 pm to
Probably easier to run a pipeline from the Columbia River south.
Posted by Liberator
Revelation 20:10-12
Member since Jul 2020
9071 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 12:49 pm to
quote:

They need to start drinking the water left over after sewage is treated. They’ll never run out of drinking water that way.


Aren't they already using a "gray water" system? If not that's a no-brainer.
Posted by Beauw
Blanchard
Member since Sep 2007
4235 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 12:56 pm to
John can fornicate himself, if you move to a desert you should not expect the same access to water as those that live near a river.
Posted by killedbyindians
Earth
Member since Jun 2022
1420 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 12:58 pm to
quote:

Secondarily, there would need to be a good bit of corrosion inhibitors injected into this water as well as biocides to prevent corrosion of these pipes. Unless they make them of concrete.


Hdpe and c900 pvc baw. It’s what most new water lines are made of only use steel for casing for road or railroad crossings. But those are petroleum based products so they’d probably have an issue with that.
Posted by PSUMMERS
Ms
Member since Sep 2014
388 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:13 pm to
Being familiar with that area. The ORCS is supposed to / does pull like a certain % off the MS River diverts it across through the canal and dumps it into the Red River/ Atchafalaya. I am pretty sure that’s the water they are talking about. That would have a catastrophic impact on the Atchafalaya Basin. Tell them to frick off.

If you want to go down a rabbit hole look into what happens when/ if the ORCS fails. Lots of experts predict it will fail.
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58521 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

I Googled worlds largest pump station and apparently Google ain't always right, who knew, LOL.
well take that back... it is 11..... it was reduced from 13. Been a while since i looked at those plans.

My bad baw.
This post was edited on 8/16/22 at 1:33 pm
Posted by alphaandomega
Tuscaloosa-Here to Serve
Member since Aug 2012
17137 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:30 pm to
It would probably cost less to develop large scale desalination plants in the Pacific.

That should be the focus. All the water anyone needs, someone just needs to figure out how to do it quickly and cost effectively.
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
42307 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:36 pm to
Mechanical vapor compression. Very efficient and ultimately results in distilled water and dry salt. Energy inputs come from the compressed steam, crystallization of salt, and start up.

They use these in the deserts in the ME to reclaim the water from the oil fields.
Posted by BPTiger
Atlanta
Member since Oct 2011
6219 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:51 pm to
quote:

Two hundred miles north of New Orleans, in the heart of swampy Cajun Country


Yeah. So roughly Vicksburg, MS is apparently the head of swampy Cajun Country.
Posted by pjab
Member since Mar 2016
5761 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:56 pm to
But but but what about the dead zone. We’ve been told that Mississippi water is shite and the Gulf is devoid of oxygen. Why would someone want that water?
Posted by Wilson
Metairie
Member since Jul 2011
367 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 2:47 pm to
Eventually....
Posted by Basura Blanco
Member since Dec 2011
11747 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

This is only 8% of the Mississippi’s flow, and it would be for less than one year. After that it would be far less. This water would otherwise just be disgorged into the ocean.


Sure. Because the environmentalists in California should be fine with the ecosystem of the Louisiana marsh and the Gulf of Mexico getting fricked with in this manner. Its not like the alteration of the distribution of sedimentation with man made levees and the oil & gas industry digging hundreds of miles of canals have done any harm up to this point anyway.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
75187 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 3:07 pm to
quote:

Yes but if they force someone else to burn fossil fuels to supply their needs and doesn’t require them to do so directly, the CO2 doesn’t count.

Saskatchewan, Canaderp has recently given us an example of just what you're talking about.

They've announced a plan to phase out coal-fired power production in favor of wind and solar. They've admitted going into this plan that wind and solar will come nowhere near providing enough electricity to meet their needs. That's okay, though, because they have a plan. To offset their energy deficit they have contracted with an Amercian company across the border to pay them 52 million dollars a year for electricity. How is that American electricity that they will be reliant upon to meet their energy needs produced you ask? Great question! Well, at least 50% of that electricity that is produced across the border in America is produced by coal-fired power plants.

Imagine that! They've chosen to gut their traditional power production industry in favor of alternatives that are, admittedly, woefully incapable of meeting their needs. That will cost Canadian jobs and ultimately make them reliant upon another country for electricity produced by those same traditional methods they're looking to "phase out", thus not actually helping the environment while potentially significantly raising energy costs for their citizens.

That's a right fricking genius plan they've come up with!
Posted by bad93ex
Walnut Cove
Member since Sep 2018
36169 posts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 9:12 pm to
quote:

It would probably cost less to develop large scale desalination plants in the Pacific.



Can't use desalination since it would endanger the delta smelt, an inedible 3" fish.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram