- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/16/22 at 12:18 pm to rickgrimes
I thought about this exact thing last year when we drove around Mead and Powell. I'm just an IT guy from Baton Rouge but even I thought about it.
But I suppose if the wetlands and gulf coast do in fact need that water, It'll never happen.
But I suppose if the wetlands and gulf coast do in fact need that water, It'll never happen.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 12:19 pm to turnpiketiger
quote:
Pretty sure 200 miles north of Nola puts you in redneck Mississippi piney woods country. Not cajun country swamps.
200 miles of river, not a straight shot. I did a double take at that too.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 12:35 pm to mikelbr
You would think they would have glossed over that at least once. They do t care. They are locusts
Posted on 8/16/22 at 12:38 pm to Nado Jenkins83
quote:
You would think they would have glossed over that at least once. They do t care. They are locusts
Oh I believe you. I was just driving a minivan through that area on vacation and casually wondering about it. But I'm a complete retard when it comes to eco systems and shite like that.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 12:39 pm to mikelbr
quote:
But I suppose if the wetlands and gulf coast do in fact need that water, It'll never happen.
Louisiana can have the sediment. Give those poor westerners a little water man! Most of the Mississippi water goes into the GOM. There's plenty of water you rubes!
Posted on 8/16/22 at 12:40 pm to rickgrimes
Probably easier to run a pipeline from the Columbia River south.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 12:49 pm to Eightballjacket
quote:
They need to start drinking the water left over after sewage is treated. They’ll never run out of drinking water that way.
Aren't they already using a "gray water" system? If not that's a no-brainer.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 12:56 pm to rickgrimes
John can fornicate himself, if you move to a desert you should not expect the same access to water as those that live near a river.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 12:58 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
Secondarily, there would need to be a good bit of corrosion inhibitors injected into this water as well as biocides to prevent corrosion of these pipes. Unless they make them of concrete.
Hdpe and c900 pvc baw. It’s what most new water lines are made of only use steel for casing for road or railroad crossings. But those are petroleum based products so they’d probably have an issue with that.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:13 pm to rickgrimes
Being familiar with that area. The ORCS is supposed to / does pull like a certain % off the MS River diverts it across through the canal and dumps it into the Red River/ Atchafalaya. I am pretty sure that’s the water they are talking about. That would have a catastrophic impact on the Atchafalaya Basin. Tell them to frick off.
If you want to go down a rabbit hole look into what happens when/ if the ORCS fails. Lots of experts predict it will fail.
If you want to go down a rabbit hole look into what happens when/ if the ORCS fails. Lots of experts predict it will fail.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:23 pm to CHEDBALLZ
quote:well take that back... it is 11..... it was reduced from 13. Been a while since i looked at those plans.
I Googled worlds largest pump station and apparently Google ain't always right, who knew, LOL.
My bad baw.
This post was edited on 8/16/22 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:30 pm to rickgrimes
It would probably cost less to develop large scale desalination plants in the Pacific.
That should be the focus. All the water anyone needs, someone just needs to figure out how to do it quickly and cost effectively.
That should be the focus. All the water anyone needs, someone just needs to figure out how to do it quickly and cost effectively.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:36 pm to alphaandomega
Mechanical vapor compression. Very efficient and ultimately results in distilled water and dry salt. Energy inputs come from the compressed steam, crystallization of salt, and start up.
They use these in the deserts in the ME to reclaim the water from the oil fields.
They use these in the deserts in the ME to reclaim the water from the oil fields.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:51 pm to jbgleason
quote:
Two hundred miles north of New Orleans, in the heart of swampy Cajun Country
Yeah. So roughly Vicksburg, MS is apparently the head of swampy Cajun Country.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 1:56 pm to aTmTexas Dillo
But but but what about the dead zone. We’ve been told that Mississippi water is shite and the Gulf is devoid of oxygen. Why would someone want that water?
Posted on 8/16/22 at 3:07 pm to Penrod
quote:
This is only 8% of the Mississippi’s flow, and it would be for less than one year. After that it would be far less. This water would otherwise just be disgorged into the ocean.
Sure. Because the environmentalists in California should be fine with the ecosystem of the Louisiana marsh and the Gulf of Mexico getting fricked with in this manner. Its not like the alteration of the distribution of sedimentation with man made levees and the oil & gas industry digging hundreds of miles of canals have done any harm up to this point anyway.
Posted on 8/16/22 at 3:07 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
Yes but if they force someone else to burn fossil fuels to supply their needs and doesn’t require them to do so directly, the CO2 doesn’t count.
Saskatchewan, Canaderp has recently given us an example of just what you're talking about.
They've announced a plan to phase out coal-fired power production in favor of wind and solar. They've admitted going into this plan that wind and solar will come nowhere near providing enough electricity to meet their needs. That's okay, though, because they have a plan. To offset their energy deficit they have contracted with an Amercian company across the border to pay them 52 million dollars a year for electricity. How is that American electricity that they will be reliant upon to meet their energy needs produced you ask? Great question! Well, at least 50% of that electricity that is produced across the border in America is produced by coal-fired power plants.
Imagine that! They've chosen to gut their traditional power production industry in favor of alternatives that are, admittedly, woefully incapable of meeting their needs. That will cost Canadian jobs and ultimately make them reliant upon another country for electricity produced by those same traditional methods they're looking to "phase out", thus not actually helping the environment while potentially significantly raising energy costs for their citizens.
That's a right fricking genius plan they've come up with!
Posted on 8/16/22 at 9:12 pm to alphaandomega
quote:
It would probably cost less to develop large scale desalination plants in the Pacific.
Can't use desalination since it would endanger the delta smelt, an inedible 3" fish.
Popular
Back to top


1








