Started By
Message

re: Vinyl records expected to outsell CDs in 2019 for the first time since 1980s

Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:00 pm to
Posted by KosmoCramer
Member since Dec 2007
76502 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

You can't beat the portability of digital music, but it really does lack depth.

Young or old, people that like music know this.


This is a joke right?
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
113896 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:00 pm to
What records do you have? I found a bunch a few years ago that were my parents & siblings.

Have Jackson 5, Jaames Brown, Elvis, etc, etc... And there is even an Oak Ridge Boys album in there.
Posted by BurningHeart
Member since Jan 2017
9517 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

Nostalgia doesn’t.


It's this.

I buy vinyl but not for sound quality. No matter how much the armchair audiophiles say otherwise, CDs and MP3s have higher sound quality than a record.

The "depth" some people refer to in vinyl is the distortion and scratchiness that comes from a needle running against dust and grooves on a record. It's not part of the recording.
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
113896 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:02 pm to
quote:

Actually records have this popping sound because of the vinyl and to me it sounds a lot better than digital



I agree. Especially if you have the right speaker.
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
38449 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:03 pm to
Who knew vinyl records would trigger the OT?
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
35464 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

Once young people hear the difference, they're fans.


You can't beat the portability of digital music, but it really does lack depth.

Young or old, people that like music know this.
You're getting some push back but I agree with you 100%
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
113896 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:05 pm to
quote:

This is a joke right?


No.. he is right.
Posted by BurningHeart
Member since Jan 2017
9517 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:10 pm to


quote:

There are built-in problems with using vinyl as a data encoding mechanisms that have no CD equivalent. Vinyl is physically limited by the fact that records have to be capable of being played without skipping or causing distortion. That both limits the dynamic range — the difference between the loudest and softest note — and the range of pitches (or "frequencies") you can hear.

If notes get too low in pitch, that means less audio can fit in a given amount of vinyl. If notes are too high, the stylus has difficulty tracking them, causing distortion. So engineers mastering for vinyl often cut back on extreme high or low ends, using a variety of methods, all of which alter the music.



quote:

The sampling rate for CDs is 44.1kHz, meaning that CD recordings sample the master recording 44,100 times a second, and can capture frequencies as high as 20 kHz. That is about the limit of what humans can hear; at least one experiment has confirmed that listeners in blind tests can't tell the difference between recordings that include frequencies above 21k and ones that don't. You may think you can hear more than CDs are giving you. But you probably can't.


Look at the science, not people's opinions
Posted by thejudge
Westlake, LA
Member since Sep 2009
14036 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:10 pm to
quote:

This isn't a surprice. Vinyl records have become more popular for the past several years. I know a guy who likes the sound of vinyl, he restored an old record player, rebuilt speakers and everything. It sounds really good.


I love Christmas albums on vinyl. The Charlie Brown Christmas album on vinyl is fricking amazing.

[link=(A Charlie Brown Christmas [Green Vinyl] https://www.amazon.com/dp/B002Y1OAJU/ref=cm_sw_r_cp_apa_i_oMKRDb916SXGP)]LINK[/link]
Posted by fishfighter
RIP
Member since Apr 2008
40026 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:14 pm to
Old school rock to rock and some blues.
Posted by BurningHeart
Member since Jan 2017
9517 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:14 pm to
quote:

This isn't a surprice. Vinyl records have become more popular for the past several years. I know a guy who likes the sound of vinyl, he restored an old record player, rebuilt speakers and everything. It sounds really good.

Also record players have become popular with older kids and no one really buys CDs so...


Your logic used to argue a point is at a 5th grader's level.
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101915 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:17 pm to
I'm no audio engineer or anything, but I have a feeling what's more important is all the equipment between the media and your ears.
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
113896 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:18 pm to
My point is this. I don’t know the last time I’ve seen a CD player in a store, but I’ve seen small record players. A friend of mine bought one for his daughters a few yrs ago for Christmas. It was pink and looked to be marketed to kids.
Posted by East Coast Band
Member since Nov 2010
62729 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:29 pm to
One thing that went away when CDs overtook LP sales that seemingly never got fully fulfilled were the album cover and liner notes. A small CD case just could never replace that awesome 12 inch album cover and artwork.
Posted by Arkapigdiesel
Arkansas
Member since Jun 2009
13154 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:30 pm to
Digital or GTFO.
Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
7352 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:32 pm to
I am no audiophile, but the reason why digital has such a bad name is that the file compression in modern CD's, MP3's, and other audio formats is that it takes out some of the warmth and fullness of the sound.

Think of a sound wave as a bouncing curve that is going up and down on a sheet of graph paper. In analog, this soundwave is constant to the speed of the record or tape. In digital, the soundwave replaced by dots or data points and the number of dots is dependent on the number of samples the audio was digitized with. In digital the dots are then reconnected when played back using algorithms. Sometimes that method doesn't always capture the true sound of the music. Obvious the more samples the better the recreation of the sound.
Posted by johnqpublic
Right here
Member since Oct 2017
610 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:32 pm to
quote:

Considering CD sales have pretty much been replaced by digital sales, I’m not sure this is a huge deal.


Exactly. While vinyl may have increased slightly over the last few years, back from virtually nothing, CD sales are approaching non-existent. I'm sure the graph of both sales would show a slight rise in vinyl and CDs falling off a cliff.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
58103 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:34 pm to
I think the idea of vinyl being related to hipsters pisses the baws off on here.
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
48769 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:34 pm to
I believe it.



Just in my logged collection.
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28082 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 7:35 pm to
I didn't want to get into bits and bytes and sound waves and compression.

It is just easier to let people hear the difference.

I guess some people in this thread have never heard the difference. :shrugs:
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram