- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Vinyl records expected to outsell CDs in 2019 for the first time since 1980s
Posted on 10/21/19 at 10:31 pm to Cymry Teigr
Posted on 10/21/19 at 10:31 pm to Cymry Teigr
Well, yeah.
The entire premise of the thread is 'vs' though.
Posted on 10/21/19 at 10:35 pm to Cymry Teigr
quote:
Most album art is readily available in high quality scans online.
This is the mentality difference. Not a knock, just come from a time where part of the enjoyment was..being able to find the last copy, bring it home..study it in your hands. Appreciate it in years to come. Etc.
A lot of people dont get into that cause they never experienced it, and that makes sense. Just hurts my heart in ways.
Posted on 10/21/19 at 10:36 pm to northshorebamaman
Best of both worlds imho for some rarer recordings. You own the vinyl, yet listen to it bit perfect without degrading your source.
Posted on 10/21/19 at 10:40 pm to SEClint
I own a large library of vinyl so I definitely understand. And years ago pre digital music I started buying unopened duplicates of some albums as pure backups. Progression with digital rips has meant I can find a cheaper way to preserve the vinyl.
Posted on 10/21/19 at 10:41 pm to Obtuse1
It’s the whole process: removing one of my garage sale bought vinyls from the sleeve, gently dusting it off, settling it onto the platter, positioning the needle, and then secretly switching the speaker to Bluetooth to play the the album from my iTunes while enjoying the tards bloviate on the depth and crispness of the sound
Posted on 10/21/19 at 10:56 pm to stout
10 CD's sold in 2019....12 Vinyls...
Posted on 10/21/19 at 11:45 pm to Tarps99
quote:
I am no audiophile, but the reason why digital has such a bad name is that the file compression in modern CD's, MP3's, and other audio formats is that it takes out some of the warmth and fullness of the sound. Think of a sound wave as a bouncing curve that is going up and down on a sheet of graph paper. In analog, this soundwave is constant to the speed of the record or tape. In digital, the soundwave replaced by dots or data points and the number of dots is dependent on the number of samples the audio was digitized with. In digital the dots are then reconnected when played back using algorithms. Sometimes that method doesn't always capture the true sound of the music. Obvious the more samples the better the recreation of the sound.
Out of all of this, I forgot got to mention that records do some incredibly amazing things when it comes to the grove and stereo sound.
If you go back to my example of the wave on a piece of paper, You cut that in half, and that is one side of the grove, the other side of the grove is the other channel of audio.
The needle while perpendicular to the playing surface wobbles to the grove and 2 pickups at 45 degree angles create the right and left audio signals.
If memory serves me well enough, quadraphonic records, had their 3rd and 4th channels discretely embedded in the other 2 audio channels and you needed a decoder to rebuild the 4 channel sound.
Now, discrete encoding is used for things like FM radio RDS, Which we learned on the OT is now being used as another lawyer advertising billboard in my car.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 12:37 am to N2cars
quote:
You can't beat the portability of digital music, but it really does lack depth.
Its true. Its like watching a movie in digital versus film.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 1:33 am to Tarps99
quote:
I am no audiophile, but the reason why digital has such a bad name is that the file compression in modern CD's, MP3's, and other audio formats is that it takes out some of the warmth and fullness of the sound.
Clearly, as CDs do not have file compression. Digital doesn't mean there is file compression. A digital format CAN be compressed, MP3s are by rule compressed, but digital in and of itself is not a "compression" format.
Your example of how digital audio works is not incorrect but leaves out a massive amount of information.
Think about this. People love film. Film is nothing more than 24 snapshots per second. Do you perceive it as discrete pictures or as one continuous stream of movement? Digital audio is audio snapshots of 44.1k, 48k, 88.2k, 96k or 192k. The detail to which it is "recorded" is affected by the number of bits used to represent each snapshot. More bits equals greater dynamic response and, in turn, detail. CDs use 44.1kHz and 16 bits, which is really the lowest most anyone goes in an uncompressed format (unless they are trying to do some lo-fi thing for effect).
The only way to ever really see if there is a difference imbued on the signal by the piece of plastic that is vinyl, is to do a test that eliminates all other variables (and the variables between recordings, even between the same recording mastered for vinyl and/or digital is a LOT). Very very few people will ever be in a place to do that. For most, any perceived value of vinyl is a placebo effect.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 6:01 am to Woodreaux
quote:
This is an example of a technology out living generations of would be successors. 8 Tracks, cassettes, CD's:
I really wish open reel would make a big come back.
The only new machines I know of are made by Ballfinger.
The top of the line version (all DD, parameters storage, etc) is about $30k. And I would hate to see the company disappear is a few years leaving unfixable machines.
Revox's model was vaporware.
All of the others are refurbs.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:00 am to johnqpublic
quote:
For most, any perceived value of vinyl is a placebo effect.
As this thread clearly proves.
You've actually got people arguing vinyl provided more depth than CDs and many digital mediums. It's patently absurd.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:07 am to slackster
The sound difference is fairly negligible if you have a quality turntable and a clean record. To my ear, there's more depth to a vinyl sound than digital, but I admit that may just be placebo effect. And whether that depth makes it sound better is subjective.
The value of vinyl to me is it gives me a better connection to the album. There's no skipping over songs, or playing just one song off the album and moving onto the next album.
The value of vinyl to me is it gives me a better connection to the album. There's no skipping over songs, or playing just one song off the album and moving onto the next album.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:18 am to The Spleen
quote:
The value of vinyl to me is it gives me a better connection to the album. There's no skipping over songs, or playing just one song off the album and moving onto the next album.
There are understandable reasons to prefer vinyl, no doubt. I find the whole experience pretty cool myself.
I just laugh when people say it provides more depth when it objectively cannot provide more depth than a CD due to the format. It's akin to saying 720p looks more detailed than 1080p - you can say it, but it simply cannot be true.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:03 am to slackster
i love Vinyl records myself. picked up a few the other night - original soundtracks to Wrath of Khan, Animal House and Blues Brothers. got them all for about 40 bucks and in great condition.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:18 am to slackster
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/21/20 at 8:59 am
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:24 am to The Spleen
quote:
The value of vinyl to me is it gives me a better connection to the album. There's no skipping over songs, or playing just one song off the album and moving onto the next album.
Agree 100%. I mean technically you can play just one song and skip on to the next album, but that's just sleazy.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:29 am to Marco Esquandolas
quote:
I’m gonna sit this one out...
I was wondering when you would appear in this thread. You are the ONLY one here who has the knowledge to speak on this subject.
Of course anyone who follows you on TD knows where you stand on this.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:48 am to Rebel
quote:
digital cannot capture the deep sound of vinyl.
Agreed. A turntable coupled to a nice receiver and some floor standing speakers makes for an incredible auditory experience.
Posted on 10/22/19 at 10:30 am to Cracker
quote:
Zero fricks given
You apparently a fractional frick since you replied.
Popular
Back to top



1






