Started By
Message

re: Vinyl records expected to outsell CDs in 2019 for the first time since 1980s

Posted on 10/21/19 at 10:31 pm to
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38567 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 10:31 pm to
Well, yeah. The entire premise of the thread is 'vs' though.
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
49487 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

Most album art is readily available in high quality scans online.


This is the mentality difference. Not a knock, just come from a time where part of the enjoyment was..being able to find the last copy, bring it home..study it in your hands. Appreciate it in years to come. Etc.

A lot of people dont get into that cause they never experienced it, and that makes sense. Just hurts my heart in ways.
Posted by Cymry Teigr
Member since Sep 2012
2138 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 10:36 pm to
Best of both worlds imho for some rarer recordings. You own the vinyl, yet listen to it bit perfect without degrading your source.
Posted by Cymry Teigr
Member since Sep 2012
2138 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 10:40 pm to
I own a large library of vinyl so I definitely understand. And years ago pre digital music I started buying unopened duplicates of some albums as pure backups. Progression with digital rips has meant I can find a cheaper way to preserve the vinyl.
Posted by CrimsonTideMD
Member since Dec 2010
7124 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 10:41 pm to
It’s the whole process: removing one of my garage sale bought vinyls from the sleeve, gently dusting it off, settling it onto the platter, positioning the needle, and then secretly switching the speaker to Bluetooth to play the the album from my iTunes while enjoying the tards bloviate on the depth and crispness of the sound
Posted by Tigahs24Seven
Charlie Kirk's America
Member since Nov 2007
15176 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 10:56 pm to
10 CD's sold in 2019....12 Vinyls...

Posted by Tarps99
Lafourche Parish
Member since Apr 2017
13397 posts
Posted on 10/21/19 at 11:45 pm to
quote:

I am no audiophile, but the reason why digital has such a bad name is that the file compression in modern CD's, MP3's, and other audio formats is that it takes out some of the warmth and fullness of the sound. Think of a sound wave as a bouncing curve that is going up and down on a sheet of graph paper. In analog, this soundwave is constant to the speed of the record or tape. In digital, the soundwave replaced by dots or data points and the number of dots is dependent on the number of samples the audio was digitized with. In digital the dots are then reconnected when played back using algorithms. Sometimes that method doesn't always capture the true sound of the music. Obvious the more samples the better the recreation of the sound.



Out of all of this, I forgot got to mention that records do some incredibly amazing things when it comes to the grove and stereo sound.

If you go back to my example of the wave on a piece of paper, You cut that in half, and that is one side of the grove, the other side of the grove is the other channel of audio.

The needle while perpendicular to the playing surface wobbles to the grove and 2 pickups at 45 degree angles create the right and left audio signals.

If memory serves me well enough, quadraphonic records, had their 3rd and 4th channels discretely embedded in the other 2 audio channels and you needed a decoder to rebuild the 4 channel sound.

Now, discrete encoding is used for things like FM radio RDS, Which we learned on the OT is now being used as another lawyer advertising billboard in my car.
Posted by Iron Lion
Romulus
Member since Nov 2014
14165 posts
Posted on 10/22/19 at 12:37 am to
quote:

You can't beat the portability of digital music, but it really does lack depth. 

Its true. Its like watching a movie in digital versus film.
Posted by johnqpublic
Right here
Member since Oct 2017
897 posts
Posted on 10/22/19 at 1:33 am to
quote:

I am no audiophile, but the reason why digital has such a bad name is that the file compression in modern CD's, MP3's, and other audio formats is that it takes out some of the warmth and fullness of the sound.



Clearly, as CDs do not have file compression. Digital doesn't mean there is file compression. A digital format CAN be compressed, MP3s are by rule compressed, but digital in and of itself is not a "compression" format.

Your example of how digital audio works is not incorrect but leaves out a massive amount of information.

Think about this. People love film. Film is nothing more than 24 snapshots per second. Do you perceive it as discrete pictures or as one continuous stream of movement? Digital audio is audio snapshots of 44.1k, 48k, 88.2k, 96k or 192k. The detail to which it is "recorded" is affected by the number of bits used to represent each snapshot. More bits equals greater dynamic response and, in turn, detail. CDs use 44.1kHz and 16 bits, which is really the lowest most anyone goes in an uncompressed format (unless they are trying to do some lo-fi thing for effect).

The only way to ever really see if there is a difference imbued on the signal by the piece of plastic that is vinyl, is to do a test that eliminates all other variables (and the variables between recordings, even between the same recording mastered for vinyl and/or digital is a LOT). Very very few people will ever be in a place to do that. For most, any perceived value of vinyl is a placebo effect.
Posted by Tempratt
Member since Oct 2013
15310 posts
Posted on 10/22/19 at 6:01 am to
quote:

This is an example of a technology out living generations of would be successors. 8 Tracks, cassettes, CD's:


I really wish open reel would make a big come back.
The only new machines I know of are made by Ballfinger.
The top of the line version (all DD, parameters storage, etc) is about $30k. And I would hate to see the company disappear is a few years leaving unfixable machines.
Revox's model was vaporware.
All of the others are refurbs.
Posted by i am dan
NC
Member since Aug 2011
32377 posts
Posted on 10/22/19 at 6:24 am to
Who buys cds anymore?
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91873 posts
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:00 am to
quote:

For most, any perceived value of vinyl is a placebo effect.


As this thread clearly proves.

You've actually got people arguing vinyl provided more depth than CDs and many digital mediums. It's patently absurd.
Posted by The Spleen
Member since Dec 2010
38865 posts
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:07 am to
The sound difference is fairly negligible if you have a quality turntable and a clean record. To my ear, there's more depth to a vinyl sound than digital, but I admit that may just be placebo effect. And whether that depth makes it sound better is subjective.

The value of vinyl to me is it gives me a better connection to the album. There's no skipping over songs, or playing just one song off the album and moving onto the next album.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91873 posts
Posted on 10/22/19 at 7:18 am to
quote:

The value of vinyl to me is it gives me a better connection to the album. There's no skipping over songs, or playing just one song off the album and moving onto the next album.


There are understandable reasons to prefer vinyl, no doubt. I find the whole experience pretty cool myself.

I just laugh when people say it provides more depth when it objectively cannot provide more depth than a CD due to the format. It's akin to saying 720p looks more detailed than 1080p - you can say it, but it simply cannot be true.
Posted by Thracken13
Aft Cargo Hold of Serenity
Member since Feb 2010
19011 posts
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:03 am to
i love Vinyl records myself. picked up a few the other night - original soundtracks to Wrath of Khan, Animal House and Blues Brothers. got them all for about 40 bucks and in great condition.
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:18 am to
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/21/20 at 8:59 am
Posted by whoisnickdoobs
Lafayette
Member since Apr 2012
9352 posts
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:24 am to
quote:

The value of vinyl to me is it gives me a better connection to the album. There's no skipping over songs, or playing just one song off the album and moving onto the next album.


Agree 100%. I mean technically you can play just one song and skip on to the next album, but that's just sleazy.
Posted by Vood
Member since Dec 2007
8623 posts
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:29 am to
quote:

I’m gonna sit this one out...


I was wondering when you would appear in this thread. You are the ONLY one here who has the knowledge to speak on this subject.

Of course anyone who follows you on TD knows where you stand on this.

Posted by Tigeralum2008
Yankees Fan
Member since Apr 2012
17754 posts
Posted on 10/22/19 at 8:48 am to
quote:

digital cannot capture the deep sound of vinyl.



Agreed. A turntable coupled to a nice receiver and some floor standing speakers makes for an incredible auditory experience.

Posted by Tempratt
Member since Oct 2013
15310 posts
Posted on 10/22/19 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Zero fricks given



You apparently a fractional frick since you replied.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram