Favorite team:
Location:Right here
Biography:I was born, haven't died...yet.
Interests:Stuff
Occupation:If you only knew...
Number of Posts:874
Registered on:10/2/2017
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
Bought an electric mower a year ago and it does the job just fine. No need for oil or gas, just charge up the battery every so often.

The only regret I have is not getting one of those robotic lawn mowers.
That is hilarious! RIP Robin Miller

re: The Fender legal issue

Posted by johnqpublic on 6/8/26 at 2:57 pm to
quote:

But once you change some parts out, is it really a Fender Strat anymore? Or just another parts o caster?


The ole' "Strat of Theseus" paradox.
quote:

Very nice.
I am assuming that this is around 15 years old. Curt's youngest daughter would be about 25 yrs. old today.


It is from April 2020 during lockdown.
quote:

You might think by The Cars. They have so many great tunes, but somehow this song gets played daily, and I hate it!


I didn't care for this song for a long time after it came out. But Im ok with it now. It was definitely overplayed in the mid-80s.
I've only watched a few videos on this but I have yet to see what legal leg BAM Corporate is standing on. How can they justify "seizing" third party merchandise submitted for sell on consignment? They truly seem like complete dirtbags. I am curious what they claim gives them the right to not return the third-party items.
quote:

Why is the top right corner of the video blurred out for much of the beginning?


Second comment on YT:

"If you're just watching and wondering about the blurs on the top right, Bricks and Minifigs used the YouTube system to force a redaction on those parts of the videos. Either these blurs stay due to the request, or Ben has to delete this whole video and reupload - losing the traction this video currently has. Try your best to look past the blurs or else Bricks get exactly what they want."

re: The Fender legal issue

Posted by johnqpublic on 6/4/26 at 3:50 pm to
quote:

Fender is essentially using the courts to try and put the horse in the barn 50 years after it ran away. While Fender has the deep pockets to afford the lawsuits, a lot of the small upstart guitar makers cannot. Even though Fender likely loses these suits (or at least should based on the similar LP suits by Gibson in the 70’s), the process will likely bankrupt most small guitar builders who choose to fight it. The process is the punishment.


I dont necessarily disagree, but Fender is trying a new tactic which, to my knowledge, is heretofore untried. They did not claim the shape is a trademark. As you mention, been tried. They went after COPYRIGHT as a work of art. Copyright and Trademark are different legal ideas. I do agree, however, this should have been dealt with DECADES ago and on the trademark level has. It's a bold strategy Cotton. Let's see if it pays off for him. My guess is they will back off (seems they may have already) and try to force companies into license deals or something similar.

re: The Fender legal issue

Posted by johnqpublic on 6/4/26 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

If I recall, the people playing Charvell's that Rick cited were pre-2002.


My point is still valid.

1) AFAIK, FMIC has not targeted ANY individual player of a strat-like guitar and has not requested they destroy said guitars.

2) Even if the guitars predated FMIC acquiring Charvel, Fender suing users of a current line THEY OWN would be an extremely poor look. Rick should have thought that one through a bit better. There are other players using guitars NOT made by a Fender sub that would have been a better, although still flawed (see point 1), argument.

re: The Fender legal issue

Posted by johnqpublic on 6/4/26 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

I don't think one has to be in a cult to enjoy good music interviews. He is often hesitant to comment on things like this as he mentioned.


He's an OK interviewer. But his "analyses" of music is superficial and often simplistic.


Saccharine music and inane lyrics.

Listen at your own peril.

re: The Fender legal issue

Posted by johnqpublic on 6/2/26 at 9:14 pm to
Got 2 minutes in and Beato has already made 2 mistakes...shocking.

The graphic said €250,000 and he said "250,000 pounds". OK, not the worst mistake.

Then he goes into Charvel having strat-shaped guitars. Well, since FMIC has owned Charvel since 2002 I'm guessing Fender won't sue itself. How does Beato not KNOW that?

In addition, I don't think Fender has gone after individuals for using Strat shaped guitars, nor will they.

Never got the Cult of Beato.

re: The Fender legal issue

Posted by johnqpublic on 6/1/26 at 2:39 pm to
quote:

PRS which has a consistently through history been known as guitars that just snooty lawyers that can't even play buy


The Silver Sky SE is $949, less than a Fender Player II Modified (MIM) at just over $1k

The full Silver Sky is $2749 (that's the most expensive one on Sweetwater), the Fender American Ultra Luxe Vintage '50s is $2999 (again, the most expensive Strat on Sweetwater)

re: The Fender legal issue

Posted by johnqpublic on 6/1/26 at 2:31 pm to
quote:

"Fender is going to lose all their customers that are currently buying Fender knockoffs" is a heckuva take.


This may depend on how far Fender pursues this. Phil McKinight believes this was always about PRS's Silver Sky. If so, I will restate, what FMIC did in Germany was an end run trying to buy some buy some legal leverage and use that.
I just don't see this flying. PRS will fight back. PRS will win the court of public opinion if Fender continues to unreasonably push this. But Fender will not go under. Just like Gibson didn't go under with all their shenanigans (and poor QA). But Fender may damage its brand for a while. I think any victory FMIC gets here is going to be Pyrrhic. Perhaps all this is just positioning to get PRS to come to a negotiating table. There are reports they are already in settlement discussions

As mentioned, if Fender is successful, it may have a massive ripple effect with every legacy brand launching or re-launching all sorts of suits against each other. Will Fender start suing bass makers who are too close to a P-Bass or J-Bass?
GC’s website is generally a disaster. And on mobile, it’s even worse. If the CEO wants to get GC back in the game, the website should be a priority.

re: The Fender legal issue

Posted by johnqpublic on 5/30/26 at 9:44 pm to
As I understand Fender’s claim, they say the shape is a “work of art” and they own the copyright as such. (I assume they didn’t go the trademark route as that, as I understand it, that HAS been adjudicated) The court never examined that claim. The court didn’t determine that to be true but awarded FMIC the win by forfeit. I think this was their plan all along. An end run around the Maginot line, as it were.

There is no way PRS et al will cave based on that decision. As I mentioned, had this been actually tried, in the US, they’d have a much stronger position IMO.

re: The Fender legal issue

Posted by johnqpublic on 5/30/26 at 9:33 pm to
quote:

These owners haven’t been around for 70 years. They paid a lot of money for very valuable intangible assets and they are trying to protect them.


Servco has been majority owner since 2020. If they didn’t understand how that shape has been used and varied for the last 70 years, they neglected their due diligence. If their intent all along was to try to “protect” something that has failed to be protected for 70 years, they fail to understand the industry as well as previous judgements IMO. I guess Servco didn’t learn anything from Henry J’s and his successor’s disastrous tenure at Gibson.

I can’t see a situation where FMIC is able to get every manufacturer to stop selling and destroy their inventory. That’s a lot of money so companies like PRS are going to fight.

The best I can see is Fender somehow getting a license or royalty payment for use of the shape. But then, what EXACTLY is the shape? Are two humbucker superstrats too close? Single pup Kramers? (Owned by Gibson btw). If someone changes the belly cut, is that enough? NOTHING has been defined.

I think Paul Reed needs to link up with Gibson. Together they have as much or more firepower as FMIC. Heck Gibson might be able to repair some of the damage they did to their brand.

I do agree, however, that the clickbait on YouTube is hyperbolic.

re: MacBook for Music

Posted by johnqpublic on 5/30/26 at 2:25 pm to
Personally, I would get the fastest MacBook with the largest screen that one can afford. The 14in starts at $1700, the 16in starts at $2700. I cannot image editing anything on even a 16in screen but thats me.

The RAM is where they will get you. To even get 64GB in the 14in you have to upgrade the processor and together both will run minimum $3k (vs a 32GB machine being $2100). The 16in comes with an upgraded processor so that will be $3300. Making the difference in price only $300 for the extra scree real estate. If thats in the budget, that's where Id probably land.

They all come with minimum 1TB SSD so that should be fine.

There also Apple Certified Refurbs which will cost less.

re: The Fender legal issue

Posted by johnqpublic on 5/30/26 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

So, where’s everyone at on this issue? PRS acknowledged they got a Cease & Desist from Fender.

I’m Team Fender.


I likely would be Team Fender.... IF...

1) they had done this decades ago

AND

2) they had sued a US manufacturer in US court

AND

3) this was an actual decision based on evidence

It is my understanding that FMIC sued a Chinese company in German court. The Chinese company never showed so FMIC won by default.

Fender is using this decision as a bully stick to try to force companies based neither in the EU nor Asia to stop doing something FMIC has heretofore not done much about.

Somehow FMIC thinks that because they won a suit against a foreign company in a foreign court by forfeit, that gives them the right to go after everyone worldwide. IANAL, but that seems iffy to me.

My guess is that PRS will fight this AND win. Fender has dragged their feet for almost 70 years. IMO, this is going to damage their brand far more than it will ever help them.
I cant see them continuing this late. Looks like Suarez will get the win.
quote:

Nothing is safe from AI+robotics.


This.

Add robotics and every single job is at risk.