
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Two men arrested for tearing down Flock camera in Lafayette
Posted on 8/5/26 at 11:00 pm to everytrueson
Posted on 8/5/26 at 11:00 pm to everytrueson
No pig here lol, I agree with one poster that most are not that intelligent.
Next assumption?
Next assumption?
This post was edited on 8/6/26 at 9:21 am
Posted on 8/5/26 at 11:07 pm to Roy Curado
quote:
This you?
I mean, if I was entirely wrong and couldn't refute anything you said, I guess I'd be posting random pics too.
Posted on 8/5/26 at 11:08 pm to BitBuster
Now Hollywood can make a new Cool Hand Luke movie. Luke cutting down Flock cameras instead of parking meters. 
Posted on 8/5/26 at 11:27 pm to Roy Curado
quote:
By advocating for the complete removal of Flock, you are also saying that you do not care when law enforcement caught that one child predator. Really sick logic here.
frick you and every pearl clutching POS like you.
Posted on 8/6/26 at 2:02 am to Roy Curado
quote:
Ah, the irony of someone calling the same people that are in charge of this sophisticated "surveillance state",
You think those morons understand anything about how those cameras work? You really are dumber than I thought. They log into a web page, grab the footage, just so they don't have to do any actual police work.
And if you think they are "in charge of it", I am beginning to wonder how you manage licking those boots with your head so far up your own arse.
The Flock system has more open holes than your mother and that's saying a lot. Not only that, their VC funding has some questionable roots as well, you might want to research the company before you dawn the armor and white knight for a burgeoning Silicon Valley surveillance empire. Or not, I'm sure you're a useful idiot to someone.
This post was edited on 8/6/26 at 2:15 am
Posted on 8/6/26 at 2:06 am to X123F45
quote:
frick you and every pearl clutching POS like you.
He's just doing his best Barbara Walters impression. He'll be posting how Flock saved the little girl that fell down a well after being chased by a knife-wielding pedo.
This post was edited on 8/6/26 at 2:07 am
Posted on 8/6/26 at 6:47 am to BitBuster
They are perfecting the technology now for the flock system to intercept, stalk, and store your Iphone, ear buds, vehicle GPS, etc.
You have gone to the bar 5 days this week, or you have gone to Mary Lee's 5 days this week. Your new digital dollar is cut off so you will stay home and learn better habits.
You have gone to the bar 5 days this week, or you have gone to Mary Lee's 5 days this week. Your new digital dollar is cut off so you will stay home and learn better habits.
Posted on 8/6/26 at 8:50 am to Roy Curado
quote:
Losers
I know multiple law enforcement operators that have used Flock to apprehend child predators, murderers, rapists, and other awful criminals. In some of these cases, Flock was the sole lead investigative component that lead to the apprehension.
The solution to the little abuse of Flock cameras by a few bad apples is more guardrails, audits, and consequences for the officers that do misuse it, not completely take it away to allow sex offenders to get away with their heinous crimes.
Just think how many more criminals could be caught if all of our rights were ignored. No more miranda, no more need for search warrants and let the beatings commence.
Surely all these crazy rights we enjoy areva hinderange to law enforcement
Posted on 8/6/26 at 9:11 am to BitBuster
quote:Whats funnier are the dip shits that think covering their faces will protect their identity
t was bound to happen sooner or later. Fools didn't realize the cameras could ID them.
This post was edited on 8/6/26 at 9:12 am
Posted on 8/6/26 at 9:13 am to America250
quote:So you would prefer someone who broke the law go free even though there is video evidence of them committing a crime because you don’t like the source the evidence came from? That’s insane to me
I'd seek a jury trial. Let 12 other Lafayette citizens decide my fate. I'd bet more are against the cameras than for them.
Posted on 8/6/26 at 9:17 am to Roy Curado
quote:
The solution to the little abuse of Flock cameras by a few bad apples is more guardrails, audits, and consequences for the officers that do misuse it, not completely take it away to allow sex offenders to get away with their heinous crimes
They’re using them to track women trying to get abortions… the first guardrail should be repealing the bad laws they’re using them to try to enforce
Posted on 8/6/26 at 9:21 am to Henry Jones Jr
These cameras will come in handy next time criminals are trying to go to the beach or play basketball at the park during the next lockdowns.
Posted on 8/6/26 at 9:23 am to Higgysmalls
quote:
People that worry about flock cameras are a bunch of retards
People that ignore something that is a gateway to a very steep and slippery slope to more, are retarded.
You retards are claiming these cameras are helping catch rapists, murderers, etc. How many of those don't already have a rap sheet that should have them in prison for life? How many of those are single incidents? How about the judges and system do the job correctly the first time and we prevent the need for any unnecessary bullshite like this. How about we start building more prisons and lock up criminals for good.
This post was edited on 8/6/26 at 9:39 am
Posted on 8/6/26 at 10:00 am to Roy Curado
Yeah I'm sure they will only use Flock for taking down pedophiles. They certainly won't retain everything and run it through AI for tracking suspects that say the wrong things on the internet at some point in the future.
Posted on 8/6/26 at 10:08 am to Henry Jones Jr
These cameras are an unwarranted invasion of privacy. Since its a private company doing the surveillance, it allows law enforcement to access the data WITHOUT probable cause for a search warrant.
It's being abused by law enforcement. There is no reason for vehicle make and models, license plate readings, registration info, etc. of law abiding citizens that havent broke any laws, to be entered into a private database without probable cause. It's illegal surveillance.
It's being abused by law enforcement. There is no reason for vehicle make and models, license plate readings, registration info, etc. of law abiding citizens that havent broke any laws, to be entered into a private database without probable cause. It's illegal surveillance.
Posted on 8/6/26 at 10:14 am to Roy Curado
quote:
I know multiple law enforcement operators that have used Flock to apprehend child predators, murderers, rapists, and other awful criminals. In some of these cases, Flock was the sole lead investigative component that lead to the apprehension.
Give me dangerous liberty over secure tyranny.
Posted on 8/6/26 at 10:35 am to BitBuster
I know most here hate him but John Oliver did a show on Flock cameras this past Sunday night. Very disturbing how much surveillance we are all under these days.
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:30 am to Roy Curado
Sacrificing liberty for a little sense of security never ends well.
For every successful arrest of a criminal there will be plenty of cases of manufacturing evidence or abuse of the power given. The technology is moving faster than the laws and protections are.
For every successful arrest of a criminal there will be plenty of cases of manufacturing evidence or abuse of the power given. The technology is moving faster than the laws and protections are.

Popular
Back to top


0














