Favorite team:LSU 
Location:Crossville, TN
Biography:
Interests:
Occupation:Real Estate Finance
Number of Posts:10765
Registered on:9/23/2005
Online Status:Not Online

Recent Posts

Message
quote:

Naw man, I saw him with Elvis, James Dean and Marilyn Monroe at Mardi Gras.


Nah, they told us he was dead. He must be dead.

Silly me, questioning what they tell us.
quote:

Consumers shouldn’t see a single cent of a “tariff refund”. This is more lazy bullshite made up by the left who want the fed government to take care of them.


Why do you feel different about this than a tax refund?

I don't know what to think about the tariffs. I generally trust Trump so I am not opposed to them. But your position is that they should not be refunded if they were not supposed to be collected, which does not make sense to me.
Why are tariffs a good thing?

I do not understand the goal behind the tariffs.

I tend to like what the liberals hate but do not understand the goal behind the tariffs

re: Do you reuse your towels?

Posted by novabill on 2/20/26 at 7:29 am to
I don't know how long ai would use one, my wife changes it out periodically.
She uses a towel once.

When would it get dirty?

re: Trump responds to the halftime show

Posted by novabill on 2/8/26 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

Why does this retard have to voice an opinion on everything?


Ya know, the same could be asked if you.

Just sayin
quote:

If you believe federal income tax can be replaced by tariffs, I've got a very large bridge to sell you.



What if half of our money is being stolen and only half, or less of the money currently collected is actually needed to run the country?
quote:

If you can't recognize what these people are going has gone far beyond "questioning ICE" or peacefully protesting, then you're intellectually dishonest and not worth trying to reason with.


I get it and agree in the big picture.
However I am looking at this instance.

These people would live to see every ICE agent dead on the street. They hate ICE. But that is not relevant to this topic.

This lady was not approached by the ICE agent because the crowds there hate ICE, was she? He went to her to shove her down. I'm just curious why. Was she somehow interfering from her side of the street?
quote:

Better question. Why was the stupid bitch interfering with ICE doing their job


I keep hearing this and agree that is an arrestable offense.

1. What actions or activities were they doing across the street that was obstructive?
2. Why was she not arrested if interfering?

I get we are all opposed to those opposing ICE, as am I, but that does not mean we can't question ICE and there actions when we see things that don't make sense
quote:

They are not protesters. They cease being that when they follow ICE and begin obstructing agents. At that point everyone there is committing a federal felony and they need to start treating them like that.


Standing on sidewalk?

Pushing them down or arresting them?
quote:

Interference with an operation is why.


That I get, and agree with. But standing on the sidewalk isn't that is it?
This is not a condemnation of the shooting. The guy resisted while he had a gun, anyone doing that job in that moment would have reason to fear for their life.

Clearly the protestors and agitators do not want ICE doing their job, arresting people in the country illegally.

I do support them in their mission, however that is not to say everything they do is right and that there are no bad apples.

So, why the aggression here that led to the attempted arrest and shooting? Was there an active operation going on on that side of the street that was being interfere with? If so, why not arrest her instead of shoving her down?

Can law enforcement do their job without undue violence? Arresting those that interfere with appropriate force to safely apprehend the offenders?

It is possible to support law enforcement doing there job while also wanting them to be held to certain standard of conduct .

re: Maine tells Minnesota, "Hold my beer"

Posted by novabill on 1/23/26 at 6:17 am to
This telling no?

Where is this NOT going on?

The fleecing of America
quote:

'm open to the discussion here

But the idea that businesses should just bend their business models in earth-shattering ways to meet the rhetoric of the President is a tad ridiculous


3x Trump voter here and I agree with you.

re: Pam Bondi Delivers!!!!

Posted by novabill on 1/21/26 at 6:54 am to
Settlements because of what students were protesting?

Allowing harassment I get, but protests?


quote:

hawkeye007 who claimed to be a mortgage 'expert' with 21 years of experience called it QE, which it isn't, and also said 'rates are not going down anytime soon'


I can vouch for his experience; he and I worked together way back when.

I did not see the post but $200B is not that much compared to QE numbers . There were trillions spent QE, this $200B is not really much by comparison and I do not think this will move rates much.
I'm sure he would play hard for his Ole Miss money next year if blocked from leaving.

re: What is deemed tampering

Posted by novabill on 1/18/26 at 11:38 am to
quote:

What is deemed tampering
BiggaGeauxrilla
Not saying it doesn’t happen but you would have to be an idiot to actually get caught tampering “directly” with a player now days. The system is setup to be able to easily make contact with their representation. This tampering bs all started with Ole Miss and their threats against LSU because of the coaches being there physically and has taken on a whole new meaning on social media. It’s not an actual enforceable thing or rule how the system is structured currently.



Can you argue tampering, when are literally paying the coach to have contact with that player.

The coaches in question may be LSU employees but aren't Ole Miss also?

I just don't see a tampering charge against any coach talking to players they still coaching.
Been wondering, if the same set of circumstances occurred and the shooter was a civilian, would the civilian be arrested?
quote:

Maybe more people will quit buying things they can’t afford


Due to lower rates?
People need to stop being fricking idiots and people need to stop defending people for acting like idiots.

Arrest idiots, don't shoot them.

Shoot is probably legal, but do you really think he had no other choice?

Also, kill people for resisting arrest? What would that body count be?