
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Two men arrested for tearing down Flock camera in Lafayette
Posted on 8/5/26 at 6:18 pm to Roy Curado
Posted on 8/5/26 at 6:18 pm to Roy Curado
quote:
know multiple law enforcement operators that have used Flock to apprehend child predators, murderers, rapists, and other awful criminals. In some of these cases, Flock was the sole lead investigative component that lead to the apprehension. The solution to the little abuse of Flock cameras by a few bad apples is more guardrails, audits, and consequences for the officers that do misuse it, not completely take it away to allow sex offenders to get away with their heinous crimes.
1984
Posted on 8/5/26 at 6:21 pm to Roy Curado
quote:
By advocating for the complete removal of Flock, you are also saying that you do not care when law enforcement caught that one child predator. Really sick logic here.
I’d rather keep my liberty, rights and privacy.
Posted on 8/5/26 at 6:36 pm to Maillard
Nobody is connecting these so called data points that you are referencing??? Flock is a database of pictures of vehicles, timestamps, and location. Nothing else.
I find it really appalling that people are stupid enough to think the government is capable of some Person of Interest type BS.
I find it really appalling that people are stupid enough to think the government is capable of some Person of Interest type BS.
Posted on 8/5/26 at 6:40 pm to Roy Curado
quote:
Flock is a database of pictures of vehicles, timestamps, and location.
They disagree with you.
That is why they install them on walking paths.
They advertise human recognition
This post was edited on 8/5/26 at 6:42 pm
Posted on 8/5/26 at 6:50 pm to Roy Curado
quote:
By advocating for the complete removal of Flock, you are also saying that you do not care when law enforcement caught that one child predator. Really sick logic here.
Is this a troll or are you that good at gymnastics?
Posted on 8/5/26 at 6:56 pm to Judnnc
Bro. You still have your rights, liberty and privacy AND child sex predators among your children... WILD way to think...
Posted on 8/5/26 at 7:12 pm to Roy Curado
Of which?
Before you argue "it's near a road" you can easily see where the cameras are facing.
As for the other part
They do not use something as precise as facial recognition. Instead they just track people who may look alike then turn them in to law enforcement.
Before you argue "it's near a road" you can easily see where the cameras are facing.
As for the other part
They do not use something as precise as facial recognition. Instead they just track people who may look alike then turn them in to law enforcement.
quote:
FreeForm does not use facial recognition or person recognition. Searches involving people are based on observable visual characteristics captured on enabled video feeds, such as clothing, visible accessories, direction of travel, or vehicles visible in the same footage. FreeForm is not designed to identify a specific person. That distinction matters. Public safety technology should support investigations while remaining accountable, reviewable, and transparent about how systems work.
Posted on 8/5/26 at 7:13 pm to Ed Osteen
quote:
Is this a troll
It is a troll. But there are people who defend this way.
Posted on 8/5/26 at 7:18 pm to BitBuster
Not guilty. In fact give them a medal
Posted on 8/5/26 at 7:19 pm to Roy Curado
quote:
I know multiple law enforcement operators that have used Flock to apprehend child predators, murderers, rapists, and other awful criminals
Yea sell out your freedom. Sounds like a great idea genius
Posted on 8/5/26 at 7:25 pm to BitBuster
I thought they only took photos of license plates and physical features of the vehicle?
ETA:Police said both were identified using footage taken by the camera.
ETA:Police said both were identified using footage taken by the camera.
This post was edited on 8/5/26 at 7:26 pm
Posted on 8/5/26 at 7:26 pm to CHAZILLA
quote:
I use the system daily and all it is used for is to take photos of license plates as they pass.
Or follow them and detain them based on incorrect data input
But lick that boot a little bit harder
This post was edited on 8/5/26 at 7:28 pm
Posted on 8/5/26 at 7:47 pm to Roy Curado
quote:
I know multiple law enforcement operators that have used Flock to track down their ex’s
FIFY. Just wait until the real criminals start using that data (Google, Facebook, CIA, NSA).
Posted on 8/5/26 at 7:52 pm to CHAZILLA
quote:Sorry. Looks like someone was too low on the totem pole to be allowed that access.
WARNING: The majority of cameras have been updated to include live signal trace technology. Flock instantly integrates your unique Bluetooth identifiers with your personal data profile in a centralized database. What does this mean? Government and private organizations with access to the centralized database no longer need physical surveillance cameras to track you down, as they already have access to every single electronic device you own.
Flock Camera upgrades…
This post was edited on 8/5/26 at 7:57 pm
Posted on 8/5/26 at 7:54 pm to Bourbon Bebe
This is the correct response!
Posted on 8/5/26 at 7:56 pm to BitBuster
As someone that doesn’t know about these cameras, why does it everyone hate them?
Posted on 8/5/26 at 8:05 pm to BitBuster
Someone needs to maker a 3d printed head of an FBI most wanted and run it thru the flock.
Posted on 8/5/26 at 8:24 pm to Roy Curado
quote:
Roy Curado
How do those boots taste?

Popular
Back to top


0











