Started By
Message

re: The Lost Cause lied to you. Your ancestors didn't support the Confederacy nor secession.

Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:12 pm to
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
24891 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:12 pm to
Majority looked at them as invaders.
Posted by HailHailtoMichigan!
Mission Viejo, CA
Member since Mar 2012
74210 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:13 pm to
I am a northern yankee through and through


The idea that the average southern white was sympathetic with the north/aboltionism is one of the most ahistorical things ever stated on this forum, and that is quite a feat.

Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
11309 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:13 pm to
quote:

Yeah I don’t think most people then were informed enough to have a valid opinion


Does this count for when they, in convention, chose to leave the Confederation of State to ratify the Constitution? Or were they not informed enough?
Posted by Sofaking2
Member since Apr 2023
21267 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:17 pm to
The biggest mistake was bringing slaves(Africans) to the US. It was short sighted and we are paying for it even today.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38343 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:18 pm to
Yeah, I'm interested in why it would have been stupid for plantations to shift to growing food in support of a cause that was to their benefit.

His only reasoning is "the ports were blockaded and the 'dirt farmers' left to fight the war so they couldn't grow food" which seems like solid reasons plantations should have shifted to food crops. Not logical justification for why they didn't.
Posted by TygerLyfe
Member since May 2023
3986 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:18 pm to
quote:

It’s happening as we speak


Draft ended in 73, baw
Posted by prplhze2000
Parts Unknown
Member since Jan 2007
58211 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:22 pm to
Sure there is a reason. War profits made by the out smuggling of cotton.
Posted by justaniceguy
Member since Sep 2020
7670 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:24 pm to
I have ancestors that fought for every state of the confederacy besides Texas and Louisiana.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Mackinac Island
Member since Jul 2009
38343 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:24 pm to
quote:

Sure there is a reason. War profits made by the out smuggling of cotton.
I understand the planters reasoning. It's that poster's reasoning that doesn't make sense.
Posted by justaniceguy
Member since Sep 2020
7670 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:24 pm to
Of course. But southerners by and large still chose to defend their homes
Posted by justaniceguy
Member since Sep 2020
7670 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:26 pm to
They can look back and confidently say the south was right about the Union.

As do many people in Yankee states.

For every person in East Tennessee or western North Carolina that was a unionist there were pro confederacy northerners as well. Something to keep in mind.
Posted by justaniceguy
Member since Sep 2020
7670 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:26 pm to
Not even the Mexican war. Many politicians were against it.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
37071 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:27 pm to
quote:

Why don't presidents fight the war? They always send the poor


Are we suggesting that the leaders should risk themselves the same way general infantry do? That’d be stupid.
Posted by Demonbengal
Ruston
Member since May 2015
5599 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:38 pm to
One of my great, great grandfathers was part of a troop sent to Indian territory to recruit the Cherokee Indians to help fight the Union. Many of them would go on to fight with the confederacy. The civil war was very complex.
Posted by Kashmir
Member since Dec 2014
10288 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:43 pm to
bullshite. Conservatve Southern planters knew the cause was hopeless as soon as the radical, fire-eater Democrats seceded from the Union. They weren’t about to sacrifice their wallets to grow food crops for a lost cause.

Agrarian societies cannot defeat industrialized societies in a war with well defined boundaries no matter how much food is grown. Dying with a full stomach is not going to change the imbalance in steel production, railroads, and population.

This post was edited on 4/12/26 at 11:14 pm
Posted by UptownJoeBrown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2024
10008 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:49 pm to
It’s been 160 years….
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
52540 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:55 pm to
quote:

Are we suggesting that the leaders should risk themselves the same way general infantry do? That’d be stupid.


quote:

Blast off, it's party time
And we don't live in a fascist nation
Blast off, it's party time
And where the frick are you?
Posted by DesScorp
Alabama
Member since Sep 2017
10317 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:56 pm to
quote:

For every person in East Tennessee or western North Carolina that was a unionist there were pro confederacy northerners as well. Something to keep in mind.


The north had a name for them: Copperheads.

And Lincoln punished, suppressed, and jailed northern congressmen that sympathized with the South’s position, even exiling one (to Canada, IIRC).
Posted by dstone12
Texan
Member since Jan 2007
40421 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 9:57 pm to
Crazy that your upvotes and downvotes are
1863
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
39698 posts
Posted on 4/12/26 at 10:05 pm to
quote:

Are we suggesting that the leaders should risk themselves the same way general infantry do?


Leaders used to fight all the time

I think if you’re willing to send others sons and daughters to die in a war of choice, then you should at least be obliged to have some skin in the game
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram