- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: The hantavirus has made it to land in Switzerland from the cruise ship
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:29 am to lsupride87
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:29 am to lsupride87
quote:pretty wild this needs to actually be said
But I will trust the totality of the medical community over pirate king and random people on Twitter
0
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:30 am to GeauxPanthers2
Hantavirus trending #1 on X this am.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:33 am to lsupride87
quote:
the totality of the medical community
Go ahead and post all the research and news articles you've reviewed from the "totality of the medical community" and not just the out of context AI summary that you so clearly copy and pasted
This post was edited on 5/7/26 at 9:34 am
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:33 am to Stat M Repairman
quote:
Hantavirus trending #1 on X this am.
It must really be really serious then.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:35 am to Stat M Repairman
‘Mectin is back baby! Trending #13
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:35 am to lsupride87
quote:
But I will trust the totality of the medical community
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:38 am to stout
"Trust the science" and the science is from the people who brought you this gem
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.This post was edited on 5/7/26 at 9:48 am
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:41 am to GeauxPanthers2
6-7 so far, they may not start showing symptoms from 10-29 days according to Claude
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:43 am to The Pirate King
quote:
Trust the science" and the science is the people who brought you this gem
No doubt, after the complete clown show 2020-21 was I don't see how anyone wouldn't be at least a little wary of what those people say. There was a lot of BS coming from them
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:46 am to The Pirate King
quote:
"Trust the science"
The science they made up
quote:
Based on transcripts and testimony from a June 2024 House hearing, Dr. Anthony Fauci did not use the exact phrase that he "made up" the rules, but he did admit that the 6-foot social distancing rule "sort of just appeared" and was not based on data.
Here are the details regarding the testimony and discussions:
6-Foot Social Distancing Rule"Sort of just appeared": In a January 2024 closed-door interview released in May 2024, Dr. Fauci told the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic that he did not recall a specific study supporting the 6-foot rule.
Not based on data: Fauci stated that the 6-foot guideline was an "empiric decision" that was not based on studies, but rather was an assumption of how respiratory droplets behaved.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:52 am to Fun Bunch
quote:
This might be lowkey the biggest story in the world right now. Its certainly not good
No need to worry, multiple hantavirus vaccines are on their way. What a coincidence.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:54 am to Spocks Brain
quote:
6-7 so far, they may not start showing symptoms from 10-29 days according to Claude
Gotcha. But is there a test that can show positives even before a person is showing symptoms? That's really my question.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:58 am to stout
quote:
The science they made up
A very logical question is what science they'll make up this time.
I think it's almost a certainty that this virus will die on the vine given how hyper vigilant people will be because of Covid. But it would be interesting to see the results if this had come before people started staying home for days on end at the first tickle in their throat.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 9:58 am to LittleJerrySeinfield
Ratt ‘n Roll baby! The official soundtrack of Hanta-26
Posted on 5/7/26 at 10:01 am to The Pirate King
This is lab confirmed a known virus. Covid was confirmed a novel virus
If you can’t see the MASSIVE difference in expectations on what the medical community knows you are internally being obtuse for drama .
If you can’t see the MASSIVE difference in expectations on what the medical community knows you are internally being obtuse for drama .
This post was edited on 5/7/26 at 10:03 am
Posted on 5/7/26 at 10:04 am to GeauxPanthers2
quote:
Gotcha. But is there a test that can show positives even before a person is showing symptoms? That's really my question.
I don't know the answer but I read the guy in Switzerland originally tested negative before eventually testing positive.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 10:06 am to Stat M Repairman
quote:
Second claim since yesterday that Claude shutting down attempts to analyze this issue. Anyone see this?
Directly from Claude:
quote:
does ivermectin work on negative sense RNA viruses?
10:05 AM
Claude responded: Ivermectin has limited to no proven effectiveness against negative-sense RNA viruses in clinical settings, despite some in vitro research.
Ivermectin has limited to no proven effectiveness against negative-sense RNA viruses in clinical settings, despite some in vitro research.
What the Evidence Shows
In Vitro (Lab) Studies:
Some laboratory studies have shown ivermectin can inhibit certain negative-sense RNA viruses in cell cultures
This includes some studies on viruses like dengue, Zika, and others
However, lab results don't reliably translate to human benefit
Clinical Evidence:
No strong clinical evidence that ivermectin is effective against negative-sense RNA viruses in actual patients
For COVID-19 (a negative-sense RNA virus), major clinical trials and meta-analyses have found no significant benefit
The FDA, WHO, and major medical organizations do not recommend ivermectin for treating COVID-19 or other RNA viruses
Why Lab Results Don't Translate
Dosing issues – Doses needed in labs are often much higher than what's safe for humans
Bioavailability – The drug may not reach infected tissues in sufficient concentrations
Antiviral mechanism – Its antiparasitic properties don't necessarily work the same way against viruses
Host factors – Human immune response complicates outcomes seen in cell cultures
Bottom Line
Ivermectin is approved for parasitic infections (like roundworms), but there's no credible evidence it should be used to treat negative-sense RNA viral infections like influenza, measles, Ebola, or COVID-19. Any such use would be off-label and unsupported by current medical evidence.
If you're asking for research or clinical purposes, I'd recommend reviewing the Cochrane systematic reviews on ivermectin for COVID-19, which provide a thorough evidence assessment.
ETA: I've yet to be able to replicate any of these "AI is doing this crazy thing" that has gone viral on social media.
This post was edited on 5/7/26 at 10:09 am
Posted on 5/7/26 at 10:07 am to lsupride87
I can't believe you're doing all this shilling for the WHO and CDC for free. Please tell me you're getting paid. Otherwise this is just sad.
Posted on 5/7/26 at 10:09 am to The Pirate King
You seem to really have a true grasp on the situation.
Can you tell us the real truth?
Can you tell us the real truth?
Posted on 5/7/26 at 10:13 am to lsupride87
quote:
The medical profession as a whole never pushed something so fricking dumb as the vaccine completely eliminated the risk of contracting Covid. Ever
quote:
“We’re vaccinating so very fast, our data from the CDC today suggests, you know, that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don’t get sick, and that it’s not just in the clinical trials but it’s also in real world data,” CDC Director Rochelle Walensky said.
Yeah, only the freaking CDC director said it, you dolt. Do you ever get tired of adamantly defending completely wrong takes? Has to be exhausting.
Page 15 of 23
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News