- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 12/12/22 at 2:29 pm to dakarx
quote:
0.0237% Less than 5,000 women in the United States meet your ideal woman standards.
I did mine for women and
quote:
26% Roughly 14,420,000 women in the United States meet your ideal woman standards
I’m not picky.
I just put exclude obese and married.
This post was edited on 12/12/22 at 2:30 pm
Posted on 12/12/22 at 2:54 pm to The Third Leg
Obesity plays a bigger factor than income in this
Posted on 2/13/23 at 11:22 am to jmarto1
I played around with the variables and obesity rules out between 84-92% of the possible candidates for me 
Posted on 2/13/23 at 11:33 am to Philzilla2k
quote:
Because if women didn’t have a pussy, we would hunt you for food.
/thread
Posted on 2/13/23 at 11:37 am to jmarto1
Lol this is great
Posted on 2/13/23 at 11:46 am to dyslexiateechur
The probability of getting me is 0.00845 
Like you, I imagine it’s my height.
Like you, I imagine it’s my height.
This post was edited on 2/13/23 at 11:47 am
Posted on 2/13/23 at 11:58 am to rondo
I was .0017%
Posted on 2/13/23 at 11:59 am to jmarto1
Less than 1%
ETA: And I don't think it's being too picky to ask that she not be fat or married and that she make the equivalent of a school teacher salary.
ETA: And I don't think it's being too picky to ask that she not be fat or married and that she make the equivalent of a school teacher salary.
This post was edited on 2/13/23 at 12:09 pm
Posted on 2/13/23 at 12:02 pm to rondo
quote:
Damn...I am a catch. Only 1.4% chance of getting me
0.93%er here.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 12:04 pm to jmarto1
Why is there so much hate for women on this board? Without a woman carrying you and delivering you, you wouldn’t be here.
I’m shocked that any woman would sleep with those of you who have misogynistic outlooks. Ridiculous.
I’m shocked that any woman would sleep with those of you who have misogynistic outlooks. Ridiculous.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 12:05 pm to colleencam
Reminds me of this classic:
A businessman offers his sage advice:
quote:
“I’m looking to get married to a guy who makes at least half a million a year. I know how that sounds, but keep in mind that a million a year is middle class in New York City, so I don’t think I’m overreaching at all… I am looking for MARRIAGE ONLY… I wouldn’t be searching for these kind of guys if I wasn’t able to match them – in looks, culture, sophistication, and keeping a nice home and hearth. What am I doing wrong?”
A businessman offers his sage advice:
quote:
I read your posting with great interest and have thought meaningfully about your dilemma. I offer the following analysis of your predicament. Firstly, I’m not wasting your time, I qualify as a guy who fits your bill; that is I make more than $500K per year. That said here’s how I see it.
Your offer, from the prospective of a guy like me, is plain and simple a cr@ppy business deal. Here’s why. Cutting through all the B.S., what you suggest is a simple trade: you bring your looks to the party and I bring my money. Fine, simple. But here’s the rub, your looks will fade and my money will likely continue into perpetuity … in fact, it is very likely that my income increases but it is an absolute certainty that you won’t be getting any more beautiful!
So, in economic terms you are a depreciating asset and I am an earning asset. Not only are you a depreciating asset, your depreciation accelerates! Let me explain, you’re 25 now and will likely stay pretty hot for the next 5 years, but less so each year. Then the fade begins in earnest. By 35 stick a fork in you!
So in Wall Street terms, we would call you a trading position, not a buy and hold … hence the rub … marriage. It doesn’t make good business sense to “buy you” (which is what you’re asking) so I’d rather lease. In case you think I’m being cruel, I would say the following. If my money were to go away, so would you, so when your beauty fades I need an out. It’s as simple as that. So a deal that makes sense is dating, not marriage.
Separately, I was taught early in my career about efficient markets. So, I wonder why a girl as “articulate, classy and spectacularly beautiful” as you has been unable to find your sugar daddy. I find it hard to believe that if you are as gorgeous as you say you are that the $500K hasn’t found you, if not only for a tryout.
By the way, you could always find a way to make your own money and then we wouldn’t need to have this difficult conversation.
With all that said, I must say you’re going about it the right way. Classic “pump and dump.”
We’ll see you in Nebraska, Enterprising!
Posted on 2/13/23 at 12:06 pm to tigergirl10
quote:
Why is there so much hate for women on this board?
This is glorious. No one knows a woman more than another woman and you HATE each other.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 12:07 pm to HodsonTiger13
quote:
but keep in mind that a million a year is middle class in New York City
What world are these women living in? lmao
Posted on 2/13/23 at 12:09 pm to HodsonTiger13
quote:
By 35 stick a fork in you!
quote:
So a deal that makes sense is dating, not marriage.
Women are more and more turning business deals for marriage late in life.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 12:48 pm to tigergirl10
Shut the frick up, Walt.
This post was edited on 2/13/23 at 1:10 pm
Posted on 2/13/23 at 12:54 pm to CocomoLSU
quote:
Female Delusional Calculator
I hope it can calculate to infinity.
Hotness / Reasonability.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 12:58 pm to jmarto1
0.018%
Posted on 2/13/23 at 7:20 pm to Snoopy04
quote:
Hell, keeping all the metrics on default but increasing salary to at least $135K a year turned the probability of finding a man to 1%. When keeping the paraments on default for what men look for, the probability is 69%. Default meaning ZERO income from the woman's part.
If you are marrying a woman who makes zero income, then you’re going to need to carry the weight yourself, hoss. If I set the parameters to the average male height and the average household income ($70,000), it says my odds are around 12%. Move that income scale for women up to something reasonable unless you make enough to carry the weight yourself.
Posted on 2/13/23 at 7:41 pm to Philzilla2k
quote:
Because if women didn’t have a pussy, we would hunt you for food.
wow
0.0723%
This post was edited on 2/13/23 at 7:45 pm
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News