Started By
Message

re: The “Dark Forest” theory to explain no evidence of extraterrestrial life

Posted on 9/2/25 at 11:45 am to
Posted by chryso
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
13761 posts
Posted on 9/2/25 at 11:45 am to
We're just another human seeded world.
Posted by boxcarbarney
Above all things, be a man
Member since Jul 2007
26722 posts
Posted on 9/2/25 at 11:45 am to
The universe is a dark forest. Every civilization is an armed hunter stalking through the trees like a ghost, gently pushing aside branches that block the path and trying to tread without sound. Even breathing is done with care. The hunter has to be careful, because everywhere in the forest are stealthy hunters like him. If he finds other life—another hunter, an angel or a demon, a delicate infant or a tottering old man, a fairy or a demigod—there’s only one thing he can do: open fire and eliminate them. In this forest, hell is other people. An eternal threat that any life that exposes its own existence will be swiftly wiped out. This is the picture of cosmic civilization. It’s the explanation for the Fermi Paradox.

To understand the Dark Forest Theory, one must understand that
-The goal of all civilizations is self preservation
-All civilizations expand
-There are finite resources in the universe
-Civilizations will have difficulty communicating with each other because of vast distances and differences in modes of communication
-When a species discovers a new civilization, they can never be sure of that civilization's motives
-The only conclusion that the species can come to is that the new civilization poses an existential threat, and must be destroyed
-Knowing this to be true, civilizations hide themselves.
Posted by TheHarahanian
Actually not Harahan as of 6/2023
Member since May 2017
23923 posts
Posted on 9/2/25 at 11:48 am to
quote:

They’re mostly too far away, not that they’re deliberately not sending messages out.
We likely won’t ever leave our solar system before we all get wiped out

This.

It’s not that it’s a dark forest, it’s that it’s an immense forest relative to what we can do.

We’re an ant on a branch of an oak and it would take us too much time to travel to an adjacent tree.
Posted by UptownJoeBrown
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2024
10007 posts
Posted on 9/2/25 at 11:59 am to
Unless they can warp space to travel faster than light, I’m not worried about it. Distances too great. And space is expanding faster than light as well. Unless of course if they have been colonizing for billions of years and we are their next stop. Well, then we are definitely screwed if they want to wipe us out.
Posted by TigerintheNO
New Orleans
Member since Jan 2004
44931 posts
Posted on 9/2/25 at 12:12 pm to
quote:

but they dont broadcast their existence


And for humanity's first broadcast into space we went with Hitler.
Posted by SquatchDawg
Cohutta Wilderness
Member since Sep 2012
20110 posts
Posted on 9/2/25 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

Basically, that was the event that allowed the mammals to flourish and led to our becoming the apex species on the planet.


That falls into bucket of “intelligent design” vs that’s the only way it could happen since we’re now here to observe it. Similar to thinking that if you made that one different decision you never meet your future wife and your kids would not exist. Was that intelligent design or was that a cooincidence that led to a specific outcome? We’ll never know without more information.

The moon being the perfect size in the perfect place to foster a liveable planet is another. There are probably countless worlds that this wasn’t the case so there aren’t life forms there to observe this cooincidence. We can…so it had to be that way.
This post was edited on 9/2/25 at 12:23 pm
Posted by TulsaSooner78
Member since Aug 2025
2954 posts
Posted on 9/2/25 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

There’s no telling how many advanced species are out there that we’ll never see


And who will never see us.

Radio broadcasts have been around for less than 150 years. There is not much within 150 light years of Earth.

Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
122173 posts
Posted on 9/2/25 at 12:24 pm to
quote:

So we are really dumb for sending out probes and radio waves trying to talk to aliens.


Why? If there is alien life more advanced than us, what makes you think there isn't alien life that isn't as advanced as us? There have been 3 or 4 planets identified that are similar to earth like Kepler-452 which is 60% larger than Earth and over 1000 light years away.

And the problem with humans isn't necessarily being dumb, we are just too emotional.
Posted by alajones
Huntsvegas
Member since Oct 2005
35930 posts
Posted on 9/2/25 at 12:27 pm to
I'm a firm believer in the Fermi Paradox. Essentially, there are so many filters that preclude interstellar travel (time, distance, advance civilizations kill themselves off before they come close to advancing to the necessary level) that it probably never happens.

It's cool to discuss things like the predator in the woods/Dark Forest theories, but they are both based on an instinctive predator/prey relationship and thousands of generations of interactions. That wouldn't really apply to alien contact.
This post was edited on 9/2/25 at 12:30 pm
Posted by SLCGumpFB25
SLC
Member since Jun 2025
991 posts
Posted on 9/2/25 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

In other words, would it really be possible to reach our stage of civilization and actually keep yourself in a "dark forest" during the entire time of your progress there and beyond?


Depends if they catch you slippin' or not.
Posted by SLCGumpFB25
SLC
Member since Jun 2025
991 posts
Posted on 9/2/25 at 12:35 pm to
quote:

Event Horizon


Great movie.

Hasn't aged super well, but still tells a killer story around some nice Sci Fi.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
48997 posts
Posted on 9/2/25 at 12:36 pm to
yes

The issue isn’t even that there no aliens within hailing distance, it’s that there’s nothing with hailing distance. We cannot travel to where they are probably for the same reasons they can’t travel to us. Pretty simple explanation…the answer is distance
Posted by SLCGumpFB25
SLC
Member since Jun 2025
991 posts
Posted on 9/2/25 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

There is evidence that the location it landed on the Yucatan just so happened to have the right materials to cause the massive blackout of the sun.


It's limestone IIRC. The whole Yucatan is riddled with cenotes and underground water from the impact.
Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
60685 posts
Posted on 9/2/25 at 12:39 pm to
I’m not worried about aliens messing with us

If they can reach us, they don’t need any of our resources
Posted by SLCGumpFB25
SLC
Member since Jun 2025
991 posts
Posted on 9/2/25 at 12:41 pm to
quote:

The issue isn’t even that there no aliens within hailing distance, it’s that there’s nothing with hailing distance. We cannot travel to where they are probably for the same reasons they can’t travel to us. Pretty simple explanation…the answer is distance


That's true as it stands right now.

It is possible there are entities that have advanced beyond the constraints we face in our dimension.

It's some fun stuff to think about and get lost in at times. Puff puff pass.
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
48997 posts
Posted on 9/2/25 at 12:41 pm to
very well said. Multiple causes can have similar outcomes. Life is nothing if not adaptable
Posted by cgrand
HAMMOND
Member since Oct 2009
48997 posts
Posted on 9/2/25 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

It is possible there are entities that have advanced beyond the constraints we face in our dimension.
anything is possible however the evidence we have now (a tiny fraction of course) indicates that it’s also possible that interstellar travel by living things is not possible
Posted by SLCGumpFB25
SLC
Member since Jun 2025
991 posts
Posted on 9/2/25 at 12:44 pm to
quote:

That falls into bucket of “intelligent design” vs that’s the only way it could happen since we’re now here to observe it. Similar to thinking that if you made that one different decision you never meet your future wife and your kids would not exist. Was that intelligent design or was that a cooincidence that led to a specific outcome? We’ll never know without more information.

The moon being the perfect size in the perfect place to foster a liveable planet is another. There are probably countless worlds that this wasn’t the case so there aren’t life forms there to observe this cooincidence. We can…so it had to be that way.


I'm in the intelligent design camp. Now who are what that was is beyond me. If there are infinite universes and an unknowable amount of events that had to happen in order for humanity to evolve, the odds still have to be staggering.
Posted by SLCGumpFB25
SLC
Member since Jun 2025
991 posts
Posted on 9/2/25 at 12:45 pm to
quote:

anything is possible however the evidence we have now (a tiny fraction of course) indicates that it’s also possible that interstellar travel by living things is not possible


All I know is I don't want to be that first guy going through the wormhole to find out. I don't think it's a bunch of bookshelves in a little girl's room.
Posted by lepdagod
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2015
6095 posts
Posted on 9/2/25 at 12:49 pm to
I saw something on tv that said more than likely it’s other humans in the universe running into the same problem we running into concerning not be able to communicate over vast distances
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram