- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: South Louisiana Softball player gets away with cheapshot
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:05 pm to tigerbait17
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:05 pm to tigerbait17
quote:
How does the umpire make that call? The batter is 3 feet out the box.
Because by rule her moving out the box puts her into the field of play it’s a stupid rule and intent needs to be judged by the umps here. By letter of the rule, the ump ruled correctly. By intent of the rule, he failed miserably.
This catcher and her coach should be fricking ashamed of themselves for this bush league bullshite n
2
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:06 pm to Chad504boy
quote:
Are you under a stupid impression that a softball is soft?
yes, the ones that the girls use are marshmallows compared to a baseball
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:06 pm to tigersownall
quote:It happens every year somewhere. It has probably always happened, but Gamechanger and social media have just made it where more eyeballs are on it. I just saw a very similar play but the girl was hit in the stomach and may have been more egregious in a GA? playoff game, that ended the game with the bases loaded in a 1 run game.
Didn’t this happen a few years ago as well ?
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:06 pm to SWLA92
Game was against south beauregard I’m pretty sure
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:07 pm to Chad504boy
quote:No. I’m saying simply by stepping out the box it ISNT automatically interference
By rule yes but there should be integrity in the rule with delay of catcher and integrity of an actual play trying to be made.
It’s only so if the batter interferes with the ability to make an attempted play by the catcher. The catcher was throwing the ball towards the 3rd base dugout. The batter was no where in line with any play.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:07 pm to SWLA92
It was a cheap shot but it’s not gonna get called. It’s a freebie for the catcher.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:08 pm to Chad504boy
Yeah you’re right, it was South Beau not Westlake.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:09 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:I don’t agree even by the letter of the rule . The batter by rule has to impede or hinder that catchers play. The batter did not do so with where she was
Because by rule her moving out the box puts her into the field of play
This post was edited on 4/22/26 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:10 pm to SWLA92
Catcher who did that is a big name and player in state. bullshite play
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:10 pm to SWLA92
Civil suit against catcher, coach and catcher’s parents. Criminal prosecution in Calcasieu Parish.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:10 pm to Fat and Happy
It’s called using common sense. The catcher hesitated and the runner on 3rd was pretty much back on the bag.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:11 pm to lsupride87
quote:
No. I’m saying simply by stepping out the box it ISNT automatically interference It’s only so if the batter interferes with the ability to make an attempted play by the catcher. The catcher was throwing the ball towards the 3rd base dugout. The batter was no where in line with any play.
Your interpretation is off. The entire point to be made is integrity of the intentions and the delay of the catcher to pretend to be making a back pick at 3
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:11 pm to SWLA92
The catcher also threw the ball towards the 3rd base dugout
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:12 pm to lsupride87
I agree with you, but that’s up to the umpires discretion and he is wrong here.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:12 pm to Chad504boy
quote:Im saying it’s worse. I’m saying the catcher threw so wide of the actual field of play, it wasn’t only an integrity of the rule situation, the catcher even failed the letter of the rule
Your interpretation is off. The entire point to be made is integrity of the intentions and the delay of the catcher to pretend to be making a back pick at 3
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:15 pm to SWLA92
To be sure I understand this:
- the batter swung at the pitch then stepped away from the field (3rd strike?)
- the catcher ostensibly was making a pickoff throw to 3B
- the C then beaned the batter at point blank
- the obese ump then called the runner out at 3B due to interference
How is that interference? To me, it looked like the C intentionally did that. The 3B wasn't even at the bag.
- the batter swung at the pitch then stepped away from the field (3rd strike?)
- the catcher ostensibly was making a pickoff throw to 3B
- the C then beaned the batter at point blank
- the obese ump then called the runner out at 3B due to interference
How is that interference? To me, it looked like the C intentionally did that. The 3B wasn't even at the bag.
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:15 pm to 777Tiger
quote:
with a softball?
I'd like to drill your stupid arse with a softball. Assuming your pathetic arse ever left your couch and the internet
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:16 pm to lsupride87
The ball was thrown parallel down the line but would have probably been on foul side of 3rd. Again, it helps sort of validate the lack of integrity in play but it’s not against the rule to throw an off throw
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:17 pm to AlwysATgr
quote:
3rd strike?)
No
That swing strike made count full
This post was edited on 4/22/26 at 12:19 pm
Posted on 4/22/26 at 12:18 pm to SWLA92
Hit girl should have hit that bitch with the softball bat.
Page 2 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News